Brief problem description:
You're on a game show. There are three doors. Behind two there are goats. Behind one there's a car. You're asked to open one door. Then the host tells you one of the doors in which there's a goat, and gives you the opportunity to switch doors.
Question: Do you switch the door?
Answer: Yes. You have greater odds if you do so.
Problem: But what if I picked the right door? The car is only in one of the doors, and what difference it makes if the host shows me one of the doors? What if I have the car?
Usual Solution: maths.
No complex maths, no fancy thinking. Here's the best explanation I've found on the web:
Case closed.
Source: The Business Insider: The Most Controversial Math Problems
Easy Math Editor
This discussion board is a place to discuss our Daily Challenges and the math and science related to those challenges. Explanations are more than just a solution — they should explain the steps and thinking strategies that you used to obtain the solution. Comments should further the discussion of math and science.
When posting on Brilliant:
*italics*
or_italics_
**bold**
or__bold__
paragraph 1
paragraph 2
[example link](https://brilliant.org)
> This is a quote
\(
...\)
or\[
...\]
to ensure proper formatting.2 \times 3
2^{34}
a_{i-1}
\frac{2}{3}
\sqrt{2}
\sum_{i=1}^3
\sin \theta
\boxed{123}
Comments
I have a much better way (in my opinion):
There are two cases:
Case 1:
If you pick the door with a goat behind it, he is forced to reveal the other goat. Thus, switching will give you the car. This has a probability of 2/3.
Case 2:
You pick the car on your first try, and switching gives you a goat. The probability of this is 1/3.
Thus it is more likely that Case 1 will occur and give you the car, as long as you switch.
Log in to reply
Um actually I don't get it. Why in Case 1 the probability is 2/3? And why in 2nd one it's 1/3?
Plus, to anyone who hates math, I think the example with 1,000 doors does it. It's like lottery: you choose your numbers, and we'll tell you another combination. You can keep your Powerball combination or you could switch. Now, honestly, which one would you do? xD
Log in to reply
Pretty much, as long as YOU pick a goat the first time, HE will HAVE to show you the other goat (right, because he can't show you the car). So, as long as you pick the goat (with probability 2/3), switching will always get you the car. Do you kind of get it?
Log in to reply
But a commoner always has this question floating in his head (and so did I): But what if I have the car? I mean, he will always show me a goat. That doesn't mean I don't have the car. In physics the car won't teleport all of a sudden to the other room because the guy just showed me a goat (possible, but I digress)...
Log in to reply
Log in to reply
Log in to reply
Log in to reply
it seems like every time I reply you simplify the problem more and more until you completely deconstruct it - like now. what's next - car is bigger than a goat?
hehe and no offense here. not that it should be, but some people take it that way I dunno. none intended.
Log in to reply
Log in to reply
Well, those who do not get the 1 in 3 solution are not supposed to get the 1 in 50 solutions, either.
Log in to reply
Yea they do this is far more obvious with 50 than with 3. Not everyone thinks math.
yeah this question has become popular among the world it seems
Can someone prove that limN→∞P=100%?, where N is the number of doors and P is the probability of getting the car upon switching. That'd be nice.
Log in to reply
Umm... Yes.
P=nn−1
So the limit is
∞∞−1
and since these are the same ∞s, the limit is simply 1.
Log in to reply
Yeh, by L'Hospital's. This shows that the likelyhood of you picking a goat if you don't switch is 100%. So if you switch, the likelyhood becomes 0% to pick a goat, and thus 100% for the car :D Nice job Finn!
Log in to reply
n2n
and plugged in ∞, I would get
∞∞,
which you might think would be =1. Clearly, that's not the case, though. :P
Log in to reply
Btw, is it just me or there's such thing as "kinds of infinities"? Lol just thinking about them drove me nuts, but I've convinced myself that ∞2>∞, even though mathematically you cannot show that. How I think of it is the squared infinity is an infinite field of corn, whereas the just infinity is just corn stacked in a line.
And obviously if we cube it we get a corn space, but mathematically if you try to calculate using these your infinities all hold same strength... But eeh what the heck I'm sure this can be explained but just I can't. I have all the visuals about infinities, how they have their "rates of change", some greater than others, but I can't prove it :O
Log in to reply
Link
Log in to reply