Hello there,
Maybe the first thing that a calculus student when studying the sine and cosine function is that these are the first that he knows and do not have a limit as .
But how about the sequence and ? do they have a limit ?
A method to prove that does not have a limit is as follow :
Assume that it has a limit then it should be a real number since is bounded.
Since , we get and : .
we have :
But the limit of the right side is :
Which means that which is absurd.
If you liked it, share it. If you have question just write them.
Easy Math Editor
This discussion board is a place to discuss our Daily Challenges and the math and science related to those challenges. Explanations are more than just a solution — they should explain the steps and thinking strategies that you used to obtain the solution. Comments should further the discussion of math and science.
When posting on Brilliant:
*italics*
or_italics_
**bold**
or__bold__
paragraph 1
paragraph 2
[example link](https://brilliant.org)
> This is a quote
\(
...\)
or\[
...\]
to ensure proper formatting.2 \times 3
2^{34}
a_{i-1}
\frac{2}{3}
\sqrt{2}
\sum_{i=1}^3
\sin \theta
\boxed{123}
Comments
Hi Haroun! Nice solution. One thing though, you are assuming that the limit of sin(n) exists, for that the sequence sin(n) needs to be monotonic and bounded. Obviously sin(n) is bounded but what about monotonicity? It behaves differently( i.e. increasing/decreasing) in different intervals.
Log in to reply
A convergent sequence does not have to be monotonic, for example n(−1)n.
If a sequence is bounded and monotonic then it converges (this an implication not an equivalence).
Obviously because there is not a set definition for the limit any oscillating series/function.
Log in to reply
May I ask what math class you are in.
Log in to reply
Haha, I'm in Algebra 1. I'm SUPPOSED to be in pre-calc or above, but my school-system is stupid. :D
In any interval of the form [kπ+3π,kπ+32π], where k is any natural number, there is at least a natural number nk. The reason is that any such interval has length π/3 that is greater than 1. Since those intervals are mutually disjoint then the sequence {nk} is a sub-sequence of the sequence {n} and, obviously, ∣sinnk∣≥23. In a similar way, considering the intervals of the form [kπ−6π,kπ+6π], we can construct another sub-sequence {mk}, of the sequence {n}, such that ∣sinmk∣≤21. Assume that limn→∞sinn exists and is the number l. Using both sub-sequences defined above, we obtain that ∣l∣≥23 and ∣l∣≤21, and this is a contradiction.
How you got sin2n tends to l ??
Log in to reply
If a sequence an converge to some real l then all of it subsequences converge to l this follows from the limit definition.
Log in to reply
but how are you taking sin2n = l because as you are taking cos2n = 1 -2* l^2. can't we take sin2n=2sin(n)cos(n). and hence sin2n= 2l(sqrt(1-l^2))?
A much easier way to see that sin(n) can't possibly have a limit is to note that since sin(x) doesn't have a limit and is continuous, it can't possibly be that the limit at integral values exists. (I'll leave it to the interested reader to prove this rigorously.)