...that is yet unsolved.
I joined almost at launch, and things were RADICALLY different back then in terms of the website's interface. One of the differences is a forums section (which was a pretty awesome feature, I don't know why anyone decided to take it down), and one of the threads contained a cool problem:
Diverges or Converges?
where denotes the number of positive integer divisors of N.
I have the answer. I also have two solutions. However, what is missing is a proof of the answer.
This seems to be a hard-core Number Theory problem. So whoever likes these, you're more than welcome to try this problem!
I shall post the answers I have if necessary. But first, give it your own shot.
Good luck!
Easy Math Editor
This discussion board is a place to discuss our Daily Challenges and the math and science related to those challenges. Explanations are more than just a solution — they should explain the steps and thinking strategies that you used to obtain the solution. Comments should further the discussion of math and science.
When posting on Brilliant:
*italics*
or_italics_
**bold**
or__bold__
paragraph 1
paragraph 2
[example link](https://brilliant.org)
> This is a quote
\(
...\)
or\[
...\]
to ensure proper formatting.2 \times 3
2^{34}
a_{i-1}
\frac{2}{3}
\sqrt{2}
\sum_{i=1}^3
\sin \theta
\boxed{123}
Comments
It sure seems to converge to 1.5708...., which looks a lot like 2π ...., but I have no proof. It'd be fascinating if it really is that.
Log in to reply
Honestly, I did not expect this problem to blow up after two months. But just to line things up, no it does not converge to that. Good try though.
Log in to reply
Okay, better define exactly what "number of positive integer divisors of N" means, because I've numerically worked this out for n up to 200,000, and that's the number I'm getting and it looks pretty stable, i.e., very little difference between n = 100,000 and n = 200,000. Also, I'm adding the series in pairs, i.e., eliminating this alternating jigger.
For example, 13 would have 2 divisors, while 12 would have 6. Yes or no?
Log in to reply
Oh, and for the record: the solutions look MAD complicated! Like, alien complicated.
Log in to reply
2π, in fact, I'm not sure now if it even converges. I'll have another look at this.
Okay, once in a while, I get egg all over my face, and this is one of those times. No, it's not anything likeI was too distracted with another problem I was working on. So, finally, I've decided to tackle a few electricity problems, and I think I'm doing all right with those. Even though I still don't like it much.
Log in to reply
alrighty.
LOL!!!
s
Log in to reply
Log in to reply
Dam I gotta write like a Nobel-Peace Prize quality comment to get an upvote from you.
And that makes it only so much precious ;p
Log in to reply
Log in to reply
55555555555555555555555555555555555555555555555555555555555555555555555555555!
(I'll bet 5$ that you read that as a factorial ;))
Log in to reply
Im getting something close to 21−(5)
Log in to reply
The Golden Ratio? Wow! You're almost there! 0.00002% error! A hint: the expression involves π.
Log in to reply
π, please post it for sure tomorrow, which is 3/14/15! Don't miss this wonderful opportunity to do so on such a significant day. Then I'll reshare it tomorrow.
John, by all means, if the solution involvesLog in to reply
Log in to reply
Log in to reply
Anyway, I've been looking for this notebook I had solutions in for about an hour, and it's gone! Dunno what happened to it, but there I had lots of other cool stuff and I hope to find it someday.
When I do, I'll post it up right away.
Cheers
Wait...that thread doesn't exist anymore?
Log in to reply
It probably does but it's really old and I forgot what was the name of the thread so... I just posted it all over.
Log in to reply
Do you have a link to the solutions?
Log in to reply
Log in to reply
Isn't it 61685?