Let Pa and Pb be 2 polynomials with same degree, n, and same leading coefficient c, with c=0 (otherwise the degree is less than n):
Pa(x)=cxn+an−1xn−1+i=0∑n−2aixi
Pb(x)=cxn+bn−1xn−1+i=0∑n−2bixi
Let y=x→∞lim(nPa(x)−nPb(x)). In this note I try to find the value of y.
Let La(x)=i=0∑n−2aixi, and Lb(x)=i=0∑n−2bixi. Later, we'll see that both the value of La(x) and Lb(x) won't affect the value of the limit. We have:
This discussion board is a place to discuss our Daily Challenges and the math and science
related to those challenges. Explanations are more than just a solution — they should
explain the steps and thinking strategies that you used to obtain the solution. Comments
should further the discussion of math and science.
When posting on Brilliant:
Use the emojis to react to an explanation, whether you're congratulating a job well done , or just really confused .
Ask specific questions about the challenge or the steps in somebody's explanation. Well-posed questions can add a lot to the discussion, but posting "I don't understand!" doesn't help anyone.
Try to contribute something new to the discussion, whether it is an extension, generalization or other idea related to the challenge.
Stay on topic — we're all here to learn more about math and science, not to hear about your favorite get-rich-quick scheme or current world events.
Markdown
Appears as
*italics* or _italics_
italics
**bold** or __bold__
bold
- bulleted - list
bulleted
list
1. numbered 2. list
numbered
list
Note: you must add a full line of space before and after lists for them to show up correctly
What happens if degPa=n and degPb=m? What would be the conditions under which limnPa−mPb is a constant? And under these conditions, what is the constant equal to?
@Calvin Lin
–
Let the leading coefficient of Pa and Pb be za and zb, respectively. I would consider separating the root of polynomials in the limit to get:
Applying what I've found, we would see that the first 2 limits are finite; the whole limit will be constant, not approaching either sides of infinity, if and only if the last limit is constant, which happens if and only if nza−mzb=0, or equivalently nza=mzb. Now, let za=cn and zb=cm for a positive real number c (so it holds for all values of m and n), and let Pa and Pb be defined as:
Pointers
1. Your end result disagrees with the previous result.
2. When you split out a limit (LHS) into 2 or more parts (RHS), it is not true that the LHS exists if and only if the RHS exists. If the RHS exists, then the LHS exists. But it is possible for the LHS to exist, while the RHS does not exist. Case in point: lim0=limx+lim(−x).
3. I suggest doing something similar to what you did. Consider (anm−bnm)=(a−b)× stuff.
Easy Math Editor
This discussion board is a place to discuss our Daily Challenges and the math and science related to those challenges. Explanations are more than just a solution — they should explain the steps and thinking strategies that you used to obtain the solution. Comments should further the discussion of math and science.
When posting on Brilliant:
*italics*
or_italics_
**bold**
or__bold__
paragraph 1
paragraph 2
[example link](https://brilliant.org)
> This is a quote
\(
...\)
or\[
...\]
to ensure proper formatting.2 \times 3
2^{34}
a_{i-1}
\frac{2}{3}
\sqrt{2}
\sum_{i=1}^3
\sin \theta
\boxed{123}
Comments
You should state what you are trying to achieve at the start, so that others can understand what you are trying to say.
Log in to reply
Oh okay, thanks for the suggestion. I'll edit it.
Log in to reply
Thanks. This clarifies the result :)
What happens if degPa=n and degPb=m? What would be the conditions under which limnPa−mPb is a constant? And under these conditions, what is the constant equal to?
Log in to reply
Pa and Pb be za and zb, respectively. I would consider separating the root of polynomials in the limit to get:
Let the leading coefficient ofx→∞lim(nPa(x)−mPb(x))=x→∞lim(nPa(x)−nzax)−x→∞lim(mPb(x)−mzbx)+x→∞lim(nza−mzb)x
Applying what I've found, we would see that the first 2 limits are finite; the whole limit will be constant, not approaching either sides of infinity, if and only if the last limit is constant, which happens if and only if nza−mzb=0, or equivalently nza=mzb. Now, let za=cn and zb=cm for a positive real number c (so it holds for all values of m and n), and let Pa and Pb be defined as:
Pa(x)=cnxn+an−1xn−1+i=0∑n−2aixi
Pb(x)=cmxm+bm−1xm−1+i=0∑m−2bixi
We now have:
x→∞lim(nPa(x)−mPb(x))=ncn−1an−1−mcm−1bm−1
Log in to reply
Pointers
1. Your end result disagrees with the previous result.
2. When you split out a limit (LHS) into 2 or more parts (RHS), it is not true that the LHS exists if and only if the RHS exists. If the RHS exists, then the LHS exists. But it is possible for the LHS to exist, while the RHS does not exist. Case in point:
lim0=limx+lim(−x).
3. I suggest doing something similar to what you did. Consider (anm−bnm)=(a−b)× stuff.