This discussion board is a place to discuss our Daily Challenges and the math and science
related to those challenges. Explanations are more than just a solution — they should
explain the steps and thinking strategies that you used to obtain the solution. Comments
should further the discussion of math and science.
When posting on Brilliant:
Use the emojis to react to an explanation, whether you're congratulating a job well done , or just really confused .
Ask specific questions about the challenge or the steps in somebody's explanation. Well-posed questions can add a lot to the discussion, but posting "I don't understand!" doesn't help anyone.
Try to contribute something new to the discussion, whether it is an extension, generalization or other idea related to the challenge.
Stay on topic — we're all here to learn more about math and science, not to hear about your favorite get-rich-quick scheme or current world events.
Markdown
Appears as
*italics* or _italics_
italics
**bold** or __bold__
bold
- bulleted - list
bulleted
list
1. numbered 2. list
numbered
list
Note: you must add a full line of space before and after lists for them to show up correctly
I just wrote the energy equation,but on differetiating wrt to time , i am not getting time period as such . Maybe something more needed . @Steven Chase sir what u think ?
I derived some equations for the dynamics, but they don't straightforwardly indicate an oscillation rate. They form a system of coupled differential equations in two variables.
@Steven Chase sir , in the energy equation at an intermediate state, by diff wrt to time , there is w term coming up , what should be the other equation be like as such equilibrium condition dont give any equation . Can u show the coupled differential equation , maybe it can help in getting the required answer . ( Torque analysis really solves the problem by considering torque about hinge point and one force equation for block M)
@Kudo Shinichi
–
Let θ be the clockwise angle of the rod with respect to the vertical. Let xb be the horizontal position of the block relative to its starting position. I used Lagrangian mechanics to derive the following equations. By inspection, these would also result from force / torque analysis.
Easy Math Editor
This discussion board is a place to discuss our Daily Challenges and the math and science related to those challenges. Explanations are more than just a solution — they should explain the steps and thinking strategies that you used to obtain the solution. Comments should further the discussion of math and science.
When posting on Brilliant:
*italics*
or_italics_
**bold**
or__bold__
paragraph 1
paragraph 2
[example link](https://brilliant.org)
> This is a quote
\(
...\)
or\[
...\]
to ensure proper formatting.2 \times 3
2^{34}
a_{i-1}
\frac{2}{3}
\sqrt{2}
\sum_{i=1}^3
\sin \theta
\boxed{123}
Comments
@Steven Chase sir , @Mark Hennings sir pls help
I just wrote the energy equation,but on differetiating wrt to time , i am not getting time period as such . Maybe something more needed . @Steven Chase sir what u think ?
Log in to reply
I derived some equations for the dynamics, but they don't straightforwardly indicate an oscillation rate. They form a system of coupled differential equations in two variables.
Log in to reply
@Steven Chase sir , in the energy equation at an intermediate state, by diff wrt to time , there is w term coming up , what should be the other equation be like as such equilibrium condition dont give any equation . Can u show the coupled differential equation , maybe it can help in getting the required answer . ( Torque analysis really solves the problem by considering torque about hinge point and one force equation for block M)
Log in to reply
θ be the clockwise angle of the rod with respect to the vertical. Let xb be the horizontal position of the block relative to its starting position. I used Lagrangian mechanics to derive the following equations. By inspection, these would also result from force / torque analysis.
LetFor small angles θ:
mxb¨=−k2(xb−(b+c)θ)Iθ¨=−k1c2θ+k2(b+c)(xb−(b+c)θ)