Titu's lemma
The Inequality
Let x1,x2,...,xn be real numbers and y1,y2,...,yn be positive real numbers.
Then, the following inequality holds,
y1x12+y2x22+...+ynxn2≥y1+y2+...+yn(x1+x2+...+xn)2
Why is this true? Actually, this inequality follows from the Cauchy-Schwarz Inequality.
(y1x12+y2x22+...+ynxn2)(y1+y2+...+yn)≥(x1+x2+...+xn)2
Examples
1. Prove Nesbitt Inequality :
b+ca+a+cb+b+ac≥23
Solution :
We can't see any squares terms on the numerators, so wishful thinking motivates us to create them.
How can we create the square terms? Squaring the whole left hand side is very messy, and a much simpler way is to multiply the numerators and denominators of the fractions by a,b,c respectively.
Now, the way to proceed is clear, as by Titu's Lemma we get
ab+aca2+ab+bcb2+bc+acc2
≥2(ab+bc+ca)(a+b+c)2
Now, we just have to prove that 2(a+b+c)2≥6(ab+bc+ca), which can be rewritten as
(a+b+c)2≥3(ab+bc+ca), which can be rewritten as a2+b2+c2≥ab+bc+ca,
The last inequality follows from 21[(a−b)2+(b−c)2+(a−c)2]≥0.
Problems
1. Prove that for all positive real numbers x,y,z
x+y2+y+z2+z+x2≥x+y+z9
#Algebra
#Inequalities
#TorqueGroup
Easy Math Editor
This discussion board is a place to discuss our Daily Challenges and the math and science related to those challenges. Explanations are more than just a solution — they should explain the steps and thinking strategies that you used to obtain the solution. Comments should further the discussion of math and science.
When posting on Brilliant:
*italics*
or_italics_
**bold**
or__bold__
paragraph 1
paragraph 2
[example link](https://brilliant.org)
> This is a quote
\(
...\)
or\[
...\]
to ensure proper formatting.2 \times 3
2^{34}
a_{i-1}
\frac{2}{3}
\sqrt{2}
\sum_{i=1}^3
\sin \theta
\boxed{123}
Comments
Hi, Here is your answer We can write x+y2+y+z2+z+x2 as x+y(2)2+z+y(2)2+x+z(2)2 So as to use The above mentioned inequality. So after applying the inequality, we get, x+y(2)2+z+y(2)2+x+z(2)2≥2(x+y+z)(32)2=x+y+z9
I liked your thread for inequality. Looking forward for next problems
Log in to reply
There is a minor typo at the end of your solution. The 3 should be inside the bracket.
Log in to reply
Got it.Sorry!
I multiplied up and down by 2...follows the same steps though.....Cheers!
Is it not possible by setting x+y+z=1 and then applying the lemma?
Very direct application question
Stay tuned for Part 2!
Log in to reply
Really nice post...Part II please!!!
I did a similar method but slightly more intuitive..
First observe 9=32, therefore, we can try to create the sum of the numerators of the fractions in LHS to be 3.
Also, observe that there is a common multiple of 2 in the numerator in LHS, so divide the LHS and RHS with 2 to get: x+y1+y+z1+z+x1≥2(x+y+z)9
Then using Titu's Lemma, we get x+y1+y+z1+z+x1≥2(x+y+z)(1+1+1)2=2(x+y+z)9. We are done.
Log in to reply
This is NOT Titu's lemma. This inequality was published in 1997 in russian language in journal KVANT by Nairi Sedrakyan, Sedrakyan not only wrote the inequality in this form, but he has shown how this inequality can be used to prove different inequalities and called his article About applications of one useful inequality. In russian speaking countries it is called Sedrakyan's inequality. Here is the link of the first page of that article http://kvant.mccme.ru/pdf/1997/02/42.pdf But in english speaking countries this inequality sometimes is called Engel's form or Titu's Lemma. Because Arthur Engel has included it in his book published in 1998 and Titu Andreescu has included it in his book published in 2003. Both authors were familiar with russian language mathematics literature and Sedrakyan's works, but none of them cited the original source of the work. Moreover, Sedrakyan devotes a whole separate chapter to the applications of this inequality in his book Inequalities. Methods of proving published in 2002 in russian.
Pretty interesting is name of this. Except Titu's lemma (sometimes written as T2 lemma), you can also find it as SQ lemma (like ...escu), or (at least in Czech and Slovak republic) as CS-fractionfighter (CS stands for Cauchy-Schwartz)
Log in to reply
Many also call it Cauchy "in fractional form," which is similar to your last name.
Log in to reply
Some even call it Cauchy in Engel Form
other method for 1)
A.M≥H.M
s=a+b+c
s−aa+s−bb+s−cc=s−as−1+s−bs−1+s−cs−1
3s−as+s−bs+s−cs≥ss−a+s−b+s−c3
3s−as+s−bs+s−cs≥23
3s−as−1+s−bs−1+s−cs−1≥21
s−as−1+s−bs−1+s−cs−1≥23
b+ca+a+cb+b+cc≥23
Actually, this is a special case of Holder's Inequality
Can you add this to Titu's Lemma? Thanks @Zi Song Yeoh
very nice way to prove it
@Zi Song Yeoh @Calvin Lin Thanks , this note was quite useful. For saying thank you I created this problem : click here. Hope you enjoy it :)
Wishful thinking does motivate us indeed.
Also nice notes
2(cyc∑x+y1)≥2⋅2(x+y+z)(1+1+1)2=x+y+z9
Cauchy Schwarz inequality states, [(x+y)+(y+z)+(z+x)].[1/(x+y)+1/(y+z)+1/(z+x)]≥(1+1+1)^2...........(£)
Hence the rearrangement of the above proves the requirement
Also Eqn. (£) can be produced by AM-GM