Finally, we have to prove that a+b+ca2+b2+c2≥3a+b+c, which is true. (The proof is similar to the last problem.)
3. (IMO 1995) Let a,b,c be positive real numbers such that abc=1. Prove that
a3(b+c)1+b3(a+c)1+c3(b+a)1≥23.
Solution : Direct application of Titu's Lemma is unfortunately doomed to failure. We divide the numerator and denominator by a2,b2 and c2 respectively.
This discussion board is a place to discuss our Daily Challenges and the math and science
related to those challenges. Explanations are more than just a solution — they should
explain the steps and thinking strategies that you used to obtain the solution. Comments
should further the discussion of math and science.
When posting on Brilliant:
Use the emojis to react to an explanation, whether you're congratulating a job well done , or just really confused .
Ask specific questions about the challenge or the steps in somebody's explanation. Well-posed questions can add a lot to the discussion, but posting "I don't understand!" doesn't help anyone.
Try to contribute something new to the discussion, whether it is an extension, generalization or other idea related to the challenge.
Stay on topic — we're all here to learn more about math and science, not to hear about your favorite get-rich-quick scheme or current world events.
Markdown
Appears as
*italics* or _italics_
italics
**bold** or __bold__
bold
- bulleted - list
bulleted
list
1. numbered 2. list
numbered
list
Note: you must add a full line of space before and after lists for them to show up correctly
Also, Thank you for such great posts! I had no idea at all how to solve complex inequalities before, but with this tool under my belt I can do a lot more than I previously ever thought I could do.
Previously, I had known Cauchy-Schwarz, but I had no idea how to effectively apply it. Can you please make a topic on Cauchy Schwarz? Thanks!
And a solution outline for 1:
Multiply numerator and denominator of each fraction in LHS by a,b,c,d respectively. Apply Titu's Lemma, then clear denominators and section out the variables to form multiple sums of squares. This is always mor than 0, so we have proved it.
Hi, Yesterday I saw the fourth problem and it really trolled me
I tried for about 5 hours and ended up with this solution.Hope it works.
We have to prove the following
x5+y2+z2x2+y2+z2+y5+x2+z2x2+y2+z2+z5+y2+x2x2+y2+z2≤3
Which is equivalent to
(x2+y2+z2)(x5+y2+z21+y5+x2+z21+z5+y2+x21)≤3
Which is same as
x5+y2+z21+y5+x2+z21+z5+y2+x21≤x2+y2+z23
The key step to prove the inequality is the following step.
We have by Cauchy-Schwarz inequality :(https://brilliant.org/discussions/thread/elementary-techniques-used-in-the-imo-internatio-V/)
By using the inequality, we get
(x5+y2+z2)(yz+y2+z2)≥(x5yz+y2+z2)2
And by using the fact that xyz≥1 we get
(x5+y2+z2)(yz+y2+z2)≥(x5yz+y2+z2)2≥(x2+y2+z2)2
Now by using the above fact the problem becomes very simple as
x5+y2+z21≤(x2+y2+z2)2yz+y2+z2≤(x2+y2+z2)22z2+y2+y2+z2 ........ By AM-GM inequality..
Using the same method for y and z, we get;
y5+x2+z21≤(x2+y2+z2)22x2+z2+x2+z2
and
z5+y2+x21≤(x2+y2+z2)22x2+y2+x2+y2
Now adding the above three results gives the expected result.
And Now I really want to thank Zi Song for posting such wonderful posts on inequalities.I love inequalities the most and I am looking forward for part 3 of your post
Very good and please keep posting such good notes .Thanks.
For problem 4,
(x5+y2+z2)(x1+y2+z2)≥(x2+y2+z2)2⟺x5+y2+z2x2+y2+z2≤x2+y2+z2x1+y2+z2≤x2+y2+z2yz+y2+z2
Adding similar inequalities,
cyc∑x5+y2+z2x2+y2+z2≤x2+y2+z2∑cyc(yz+y2+z2)=x2+y2+z22(x2+y2+z2)+(xy+yz+zx)=2+x2+y2+z2xy+yz+zx≤3
The final equality follows, since, x2+y2+z2≥xy+yz+zx⟺21[(x−y)2+(y−z)2+(z−x)2]≥0.
For problem 2,
cyc∑b+2c+3da=cyc∑ab+2ca+3daa2≥∑cyc(ab+2ac+3ad)(a+b+c+d)2=4(ab+bc+cd+da+ca+bd)(a+b+c+d)2=4(ab+bc+cd+da+ca+bd)a2+b2+c2+d2+21
So, it suffices to prove that
4(ab+bc+cd+da+ca+bd)a2+b2+c2+d2≥61⟺3(a2+b2+c2+d2)≥2(ab+bc+cd+da+ca+bd)⟺(a−b)2+(b−c)2+(c−d)2+(d−a)2+(b−d)2+(a−c)2≥0
Easy Math Editor
This discussion board is a place to discuss our Daily Challenges and the math and science related to those challenges. Explanations are more than just a solution — they should explain the steps and thinking strategies that you used to obtain the solution. Comments should further the discussion of math and science.
When posting on Brilliant:
*italics*
or_italics_
**bold**
or__bold__
paragraph 1
paragraph 2
[example link](https://brilliant.org)
> This is a quote
\(
...\)
or\[
...\]
to ensure proper formatting.2 \times 3
2^{34}
a_{i-1}
\frac{2}{3}
\sqrt{2}
\sum_{i=1}^3
\sin \theta
\boxed{123}
Comments
Will there be a part 3 with ore problems??
Great posts! Looking forwards to more inequality posts, as inequalities are my worst subject.
Log in to reply
Hello @Daniel Chiu ! Check my posts for inequalities :D
Small typo: on the first problem, after "by titu's lemma", the b and c should be to the 4th power.
Log in to reply
Also, Thank you for such great posts! I had no idea at all how to solve complex inequalities before, but with this tool under my belt I can do a lot more than I previously ever thought I could do.
Previously, I had known Cauchy-Schwarz, but I had no idea how to effectively apply it. Can you please make a topic on Cauchy Schwarz? Thanks!
And a solution outline for 1:
Multiply numerator and denominator of each fraction in LHS by a,b,c,d respectively. Apply Titu's Lemma, then clear denominators and section out the variables to form multiple sums of squares. This is always mor than 0, so we have proved it.
Log in to reply
Actually, Anqi had made a post on Cauchy-Schwarz.
Log in to reply
Log in to reply
Edited. Thanks for pointing out.
Hints on Prob 4??? :(
Log in to reply
There is a 2 step solution to Problem 4, which won the Special Prize at IMO'05.
Log in to reply
Whoa!!A little hint?? :p
Log in to reply
Hi, Yesterday I saw the fourth problem and it really trolled me I tried for about 5 hours and ended up with this solution.Hope it works. We have to prove the following
x5+y2+z2x2+y2+z2+y5+x2+z2x2+y2+z2+z5+y2+x2x2+y2+z2≤3 Which is equivalent to
(x2+y2+z2)(x5+y2+z21+y5+x2+z21+z5+y2+x21)≤3 Which is same as
x5+y2+z21+y5+x2+z21+z5+y2+x21≤x2+y2+z23
The key step to prove the inequality is the following step. We have by Cauchy-Schwarz inequality :(https://brilliant.org/discussions/thread/elementary-techniques-used-in-the-imo-internatio-V/)
By using the inequality, we get (x5+y2+z2)(yz+y2+z2)≥(x5yz+y2+z2)2 And by using the fact that xyz≥1 we get (x5+y2+z2)(yz+y2+z2)≥(x5yz+y2+z2)2≥(x2+y2+z2)2 Now by using the above fact the problem becomes very simple as x5+y2+z21≤(x2+y2+z2)2yz+y2+z2≤(x2+y2+z2)22z2+y2+y2+z2 ........ By AM-GM inequality..
Using the same method for y and z, we get; y5+x2+z21≤(x2+y2+z2)22x2+z2+x2+z2 and
z5+y2+x21≤(x2+y2+z2)22x2+y2+x2+y2
Now adding the above three results gives the expected result. And Now I really want to thank Zi Song for posting such wonderful posts on inequalities.I love inequalities the most and I am looking forward for part 3 of your post Very good and please keep posting such good notes .Thanks.
Log in to reply
Really nice....I also spent a bit of time on this problem....
Log in to reply
Thanks
how can we solve question no 2
For problem 4, (x5+y2+z2)(x1+y2+z2)≥(x2+y2+z2)2 ⟺x5+y2+z2x2+y2+z2≤x2+y2+z2x1+y2+z2≤x2+y2+z2yz+y2+z2 Adding similar inequalities, cyc∑x5+y2+z2x2+y2+z2≤x2+y2+z2∑cyc(yz+y2+z2) =x2+y2+z22(x2+y2+z2)+(xy+yz+zx)=2+x2+y2+z2xy+yz+zx≤3 The final equality follows, since, x2+y2+z2≥xy+yz+zx⟺21[(x−y)2+(y−z)2+(z−x)2]≥0.
For problem 2, cyc∑b+2c+3da=cyc∑ab+2ca+3daa2≥∑cyc(ab+2ac+3ad)(a+b+c+d)2 =4(ab+bc+cd+da+ca+bd)(a+b+c+d)2=4(ab+bc+cd+da+ca+bd)a2+b2+c2+d2+21 So, it suffices to prove that 4(ab+bc+cd+da+ca+bd)a2+b2+c2+d2≥61⟺3(a2+b2+c2+d2)≥2(ab+bc+cd+da+ca+bd) ⟺(a−b)2+(b−c)2+(c−d)2+(d−a)2+(b−d)2+(a−c)2≥0