I was going to make this into a problem, but I didn't know how to articulate it well enough for that purpose. Anyhow, it is kind of interesting. Looking at the diagram:
As you see, I've simply bisected the first circle, and put in another two circles half the diameter inside. Next, I use the vesica to bisect the original circle perpendicularly:
Now I draw segments from the centres of both smaller circles to the top point F:
Now, If we bisect these line segments, we get two points, H and I:
If we connect the two points, we get a line equal in distance to one-fourth of our first circle:
You will also notice that the line segments extended from bisecting the two original segments intersects at one-fourth the radius also.
We can prove this by drawing a vesica with the original circle, noting that it creates and angle of 60 degrees. Because of opposite interior angles, we can be sure that say angle ADF is also 60 degrees. Since we used perpendicular bisection, the top angle, AFD is 30 degrees. If we look at the 30, 60, 90 triangle:
The hypotenuse (for this example, that would be line segment DF) is 2x. Bisecting gives us x, which is the radius of our circle centred on point D or C. This is the measure of diameter, so half x is . Therefore, we have divided the original circle in quarters.
This is not really important, but maybe someone could make a problem out of it.
Easy Math Editor
This discussion board is a place to discuss our Daily Challenges and the math and science related to those challenges. Explanations are more than just a solution — they should explain the steps and thinking strategies that you used to obtain the solution. Comments should further the discussion of math and science.
When posting on Brilliant:
*italics*
or_italics_
**bold**
or__bold__
paragraph 1
paragraph 2
[example link](https://brilliant.org)
> This is a quote
\(
...\)
or\[
...\]
to ensure proper formatting.2 \times 3
2^{34}
a_{i-1}
\frac{2}{3}
\sqrt{2}
\sum_{i=1}^3
\sin \theta
\boxed{123}
Comments
You have posted few really nice articles which i liked
Log in to reply
@Aman Dubey Thanks! It does mean a lot to hear that, my friend. :)
I could have made an awesome question, but a s you have a ready explained so I won't
Log in to reply
@Rishabh Sood Oh no, please feel free to make a question using this if you want to. I just wasn't able to articulate it well enough to make one. So if you want to, go ahead man! :)
Log in to reply
That's ok, but awesome, very very awesome article
Log in to reply
Log in to reply
Log in to reply
Log in to reply
Log in to reply
Log in to reply
Log in to reply
Log in to reply
Log in to reply
Log in to reply
I don't see how you get 30-60-90 since, for instance, angle ADF is arctan(2).
Log in to reply
@Mark C
Hmm. You are right. That is obviously not a 30 60 90, now that you mention it. I am not sure what I was thinking, to be honest.