Torricelli's Equation

I'm Wishing To Make A Few Notes About Some Things About Physics , I So Thought in Equation Torricelli, Is An Equation that All Beginner Will See !


The Equation Is An Equation Torricelli kinematic was discovered by Evangelista Torricelli, one whose function is the ability to calculate the final speed of a body in uniform rectilinear motion varied (accelerated motion) without having to know the time interval in which this remained movimento. the great advantage of this equation is that the time factor does not existe.

The equation has the form:

Where vfv_f and vov_o Represent the initial and final velocities of the body, respectively, Δs\Delta s represents the distance traveled and aa is the acceleration.

This equation can be deduced from the following equations:

Isolating tt in the second equation :

And replacing it with the first, We have to :


Examples

I ) A motorcycle has an initial speed of 20m/s20 m/s and acquires a constant acceleration equal to 2m/s22m / s^2 . Calculate your speed in m/sm / s to cover 100m100 m

Solution :

v2=vo2+2aΔsv^2 = v_o^2 + 2a \Delta s

v2=202+2.2.100v^2= 20^2+2.2.100

v2=400+400v^2 = 400+400

v2=800v^2 = 800

v=800v = \sqrt{800}

v=28,28m/s\boxed{v = 28,28 m/s }

II ) A particle initially at rest shall be accelerated continuously at a rate of 3.0m/s23.0 m/s^2 in the direction of the trajectory. Having driven 24m24 m , its speed is :

Solution :

Removing the text data, We have :

vo=0v_o = 0

a=3m/s2a = 3 m/s^2

Δs=24m\Delta s = 24 m

As we do not know the time of movement applies to equation Torricelli :

v2=vo2+2aΔsv^2 = v_o^2 + 2a \Delta s

v2=02+2324v^2 = 0 \cdot 2 + 2 \cdot 3 \cdot 24

v2=144v^2 = 144

v=12m/s\boxed{v = 12 m/s}

III ) A driver is traveling by car on a highway at a constant speed of 90km/h90 km / h , when he notices a horse in front of him and decides to stop printing a constant deceleration of 18km/h18 km / h per second. Calculate the minimum stopping distance in meters.

Solution :

First we transform the initial speed of km/hkm / h to m/sm / s, then we will analyze the acceleration as it slows down when the driver indicates that he steps on the brakes, ie, have a negative acceleration that is in km/hkm / h and needs to be transformed in m/sm / s by ss will be the same as m/s2m / s^2 .

vo=90km/h=25m/sv_o = 90km / h = 25 m / s

a=18km/h=5m/s2a = 18 km / h = - 5m / s^2

v=0v = 0

v2=vo2+2aΔsv^2 = v_o^2 + 2a \Delta s

02=252+2.(5).Δs0^2 = 25^2 +2.(-5). \Delta s

0=62510Δs0 = 625 - 10 \Delta s

625=10Δs-625 = -10 \Delta s

Δs=62510- \Delta s = \frac{625}{-10} (Isolating the variable)

Δs=62.5- \Delta s = - 62.5

Δs=62,5m\boxed{\Delta s = 62,5m}


**If You Know Any Problem About This , Comment Here For Others Make This Note Be Important !

*Thanks ! :D

#Physics #Mechanics #Torricelli

Note by Gabriel Merces
7 years, 1 month ago

No vote yet
1 vote

  Easy Math Editor

This discussion board is a place to discuss our Daily Challenges and the math and science related to those challenges. Explanations are more than just a solution — they should explain the steps and thinking strategies that you used to obtain the solution. Comments should further the discussion of math and science.

When posting on Brilliant:

  • Use the emojis to react to an explanation, whether you're congratulating a job well done , or just really confused .
  • Ask specific questions about the challenge or the steps in somebody's explanation. Well-posed questions can add a lot to the discussion, but posting "I don't understand!" doesn't help anyone.
  • Try to contribute something new to the discussion, whether it is an extension, generalization or other idea related to the challenge.
  • Stay on topic — we're all here to learn more about math and science, not to hear about your favorite get-rich-quick scheme or current world events.

MarkdownAppears as
*italics* or _italics_ italics
**bold** or __bold__ bold

- bulleted
- list

  • bulleted
  • list

1. numbered
2. list

  1. numbered
  2. list
Note: you must add a full line of space before and after lists for them to show up correctly
paragraph 1

paragraph 2

paragraph 1

paragraph 2

[example link](https://brilliant.org)example link
> This is a quote
This is a quote
    # I indented these lines
    # 4 spaces, and now they show
    # up as a code block.

    print "hello world"
# I indented these lines
# 4 spaces, and now they show
# up as a code block.

print "hello world"
MathAppears as
Remember to wrap math in \( ... \) or \[ ... \] to ensure proper formatting.
2 \times 3 2×3 2 \times 3
2^{34} 234 2^{34}
a_{i-1} ai1 a_{i-1}
\frac{2}{3} 23 \frac{2}{3}
\sqrt{2} 2 \sqrt{2}
\sum_{i=1}^3 i=13 \sum_{i=1}^3
\sin \theta sinθ \sin \theta
\boxed{123} 123 \boxed{123}

Comments

There is also an equation for finding displacement in a certain second.

sn=u+12a(2n1)s_n=u+\frac{1}{2}a(2n-1), where sns_n is the displacement in the nthn^{th} second, uu is the initial velocity at t=0t=0, and aa is the constant acceleration.

Nanayaranaraknas Vahdam - 7 years, 1 month ago

Log in to reply

can you please derive the equation? it works,, but with respect to dimensions i found it a little weird.

hardik nanavati - 7 years, 1 month ago

Log in to reply

Sure. Here is the derivation.

Say a particle is at point OO at t=0t=0. The particle moves in a straight line under constant acceleration to a point PP in time t=n1t=n-1, and then to a point QQ in time t=nt=n. Thus, displacement in the nthn^{th} second is just OQOPOQ-OP.

Using the formula for displacement, s=ut+12(a)(t2)s=ut+\frac12(a)(t^2)

OQ=un+12(a)(n2)OQ=un+\frac12(a)(n^2)

OP=u(n1)+12(a)((n1)2)OP=u(n-1)+\frac12(a)((n-1)^2)

Thus, OPOQ=sn=u+12(a)(2n1)OP-OQ=\boxed{s_n= u + \frac12(a)(2n-1)}

I realise that the dimensions do not add up, but you have to consider t=1t=1 and the formula is derived, and is true for all forms of straight line uniform motion.

Nanayaranaraknas Vahdam - 7 years, 1 month ago

Log in to reply

@Nanayaranaraknas Vahdam good one, and it`s very convincing , thanks!!!

hardik nanavati - 7 years ago

@Nanayaranaraknas Vahdam using calculus is much more easy

@Nanayaranaraknas Vahdam Dimensions do add up. It is not simply "u" but .." u * 1sec."

Niranjan Khanderia - 6 years, 9 months ago

The derivation is very simple by calculus.

Hey Gabriel, can you please make a note on electricity and magnetism related physics?

Kartik Sharma - 7 years, 1 month ago

Log in to reply

@Kartik Sharma Do You Want What Topic Specific ?

Have Much Topics , I'll Try Make A Set About It !

Thanks By Your Suggestion !

Gabriel Merces - 7 years, 1 month ago

Log in to reply

@Gabriel Merces Thanks for your reply!

I want a set on both these topics explaining almost everything from basics to intermediate(advanced is your choice, actually I am not so advanced, that's why)

Again, thank you in anticipation!

Kartik Sharma - 7 years ago

@Gabriel Merces Hi Gabriel can you do a note on waves too please.

Mardokay Mosazghi - 7 years, 1 month ago

Log in to reply

Here Have A Little About Waves : Waves

Gabriel Merces - 7 years, 1 month ago

@Gabriel Merces Hi Gabriel can you do a note on rotational mechanics please

Saurav Sharma - 7 years, 1 month ago

this equation can also be derived from calculus

If a mass m moves a distance s with uniform acceleration a, looses its velocity from Vo to V, equating work and kinetic energy, we get WD = loss in KE..>mas=1/2mVo21/2mV2     \\ m * a * s=1/2mVo^2-1/2*m*V^2 \implies your equation directly. It is from the energy equation.

Niranjan Khanderia - 6 years, 9 months ago
×

Problem Loading...

Note Loading...

Set Loading...