Triangle Dissection

What is the smallest number of acute triangles into which any obtuse triangle can be dissected? Or prove the impossibility of it.

Clarification: A right angle is neither acute nor obtuse.

Source: Martin Gardner.
#Logic

Note by Pi Han Goh
5 years, 10 months ago

No vote yet
1 vote

  Easy Math Editor

This discussion board is a place to discuss our Daily Challenges and the math and science related to those challenges. Explanations are more than just a solution — they should explain the steps and thinking strategies that you used to obtain the solution. Comments should further the discussion of math and science.

When posting on Brilliant:

  • Use the emojis to react to an explanation, whether you're congratulating a job well done , or just really confused .
  • Ask specific questions about the challenge or the steps in somebody's explanation. Well-posed questions can add a lot to the discussion, but posting "I don't understand!" doesn't help anyone.
  • Try to contribute something new to the discussion, whether it is an extension, generalization or other idea related to the challenge.
  • Stay on topic — we're all here to learn more about math and science, not to hear about your favorite get-rich-quick scheme or current world events.

MarkdownAppears as
*italics* or _italics_ italics
**bold** or __bold__ bold

- bulleted
- list

  • bulleted
  • list

1. numbered
2. list

  1. numbered
  2. list
Note: you must add a full line of space before and after lists for them to show up correctly
paragraph 1

paragraph 2

paragraph 1

paragraph 2

[example link](https://brilliant.org)example link
> This is a quote
This is a quote
    # I indented these lines
    # 4 spaces, and now they show
    # up as a code block.

    print "hello world"
# I indented these lines
# 4 spaces, and now they show
# up as a code block.

print "hello world"
MathAppears as
Remember to wrap math in \( ... \) or \[ ... \] to ensure proper formatting.
2 \times 3 2×3 2 \times 3
2^{34} 234 2^{34}
a_{i-1} ai1 a_{i-1}
\frac{2}{3} 23 \frac{2}{3}
\sqrt{2} 2 \sqrt{2}
\sum_{i=1}^3 i=13 \sum_{i=1}^3
\sin \theta sinθ \sin \theta
\boxed{123} 123 \boxed{123}

Comments

Spoiler alert ..... Don't scroll down until you've given up looking for your own proof ...

The answer is 7.7. Wallace Manheimer came up with the proof back in 1960. Briefly, if we were to draw a line from the vertex at the obtuse angle to the opposite side then either we'd end end up with two right triangles, or one of the partitioned triangles would be obtuse. So then we would have either one or two triangles to dissect into acute triangles, which would result in a non-minimal dissection of the original triangle. So in order to find a minimal solution, the line from vertex at the obtuse angle cannot go all the way to the opposite side.

Now from the endpoint of this abbreviated line must emanate a minimum of 55 lines, (inclusive of the first line from the obtuse vertex), since otherwise not all of the angles at this vertex would be acute. The points where these additional 44 lines intersect the sides of the original triangle can then be joined, resulting in an inner pentagon composed of 55 triangles plus 22 "outer" triangles for a total of 77 acute triangles formed.

Here is a diagram of the minimal dissection "template".

Brian Charlesworth - 5 years, 10 months ago

Log in to reply

NICE! The inspiration must have gave it away ahah!

Follow-up question:

Prove that an obtuse triangle ca be dissected into a minimum of 8 acute isosceles triangles.

Pi Han Goh - 5 years, 10 months ago

@Pi Han Goh How do I create a vertical "spoiler gap" in LaTeX?

Brian Charlesworth - 5 years, 10 months ago

Log in to reply

Edited it in for you. Essentially you have to tell it to "leave several empty rows", and also force the rows to not be collapsed.

Calvin Lin Staff - 5 years, 10 months ago

Log in to reply

@Calvin Lin Great! Thanks for doing that. :)

Brian Charlesworth - 5 years, 10 months ago

7

Aryan Gupta - 2 years, 8 months ago
×

Problem Loading...

Note Loading...

Set Loading...