This discussion board is a place to discuss our Daily Challenges and the math and science
related to those challenges. Explanations are more than just a solution — they should
explain the steps and thinking strategies that you used to obtain the solution. Comments
should further the discussion of math and science.
When posting on Brilliant:
Use the emojis to react to an explanation, whether you're congratulating a job well done , or just really confused .
Ask specific questions about the challenge or the steps in somebody's explanation. Well-posed questions can add a lot to the discussion, but posting "I don't understand!" doesn't help anyone.
Try to contribute something new to the discussion, whether it is an extension, generalization or other idea related to the challenge.
Stay on topic — we're all here to learn more about math and science, not to hear about your favorite get-rich-quick scheme or current world events.
Markdown
Appears as
*italics* or _italics_
italics
**bold** or __bold__
bold
- bulleted - list
bulleted
list
1. numbered 2. list
numbered
list
Note: you must add a full line of space before and after lists for them to show up correctly
This is a problem which apparently came in one of Russia's elite math examinations (I have no idea which one) Source: The Art And Craft Of Problem Solving
However, I graphed these two functions and found that they never intersect, implying there are no solutions. But, how do we theoretically prove that this has no solutions within the real numbers?
@Nilabha Saha
–
Yup, the idea is to show that these 2 graphs never intersect (over the reals). It's somewhat tricky to prove that though. AFAIK there isn't a "non-calculus" approach.
Is there any other way? Perhaps, since we know that sin(x) = cos(x) for x = \frac{{pi}{4} and \frac{5 * {pi}}{4}. Or that sin({pi} - x) = cos(x). Do we get any lead like that? I couldn't find any, but you might. Thanks for helping.
Well, you might get principal solutions like that. But you have to think for general cases while solving problems like these, for example sinx=cosx has the general solution of nπ+4π, where n∈N. As for the identity sink(2π−x)=coskx, I haven't still tried that approach. I would check it out too, and let you know.
I found it online that this is a problem from the All Russian Olympiad 1995, Grade 10, Problem 1.
Easy Math Editor
This discussion board is a place to discuss our Daily Challenges and the math and science related to those challenges. Explanations are more than just a solution — they should explain the steps and thinking strategies that you used to obtain the solution. Comments should further the discussion of math and science.
When posting on Brilliant:
*italics*
or_italics_
**bold**
or__bold__
paragraph 1
paragraph 2
[example link](https://brilliant.org)
> This is a quote
\(
...\)
or\[
...\]
to ensure proper formatting.2 \times 3
2^{34}
a_{i-1}
\frac{2}{3}
\sqrt{2}
\sum_{i=1}^3
\sin \theta
\boxed{123}
Comments
What have you done? What have you tried? Where are you stuck?
Log in to reply
This is a problem which apparently came in one of Russia's elite math examinations (I have no idea which one) Source: The Art And Craft Of Problem Solving
Log in to reply
However, I graphed these two functions and found that they never intersect, implying there are no solutions. But, how do we theoretically prove that this has no solutions within the real numbers?
Log in to reply
Log in to reply
Well, according to Wolfram alpha, the solution(s) are:
xx≈≈−4.71±1.21i0.76±0.61i
Its graph looks like this:
I couldn't properly solve the problem, but I managed to get to this point.
cos(cos(cos(cosx)))=sin(sin(sin(sinx)))⟹1−sin21−sin21−sin21−sin2x=1−cos21−cos21−cos21−cos2x⟹sin21−sin21−sin21−sin2x=cos21−cos21−cos21−cos2x⟹cos21−cos21−cos21−cos2x−sin21−sin21−sin21−sin2x=0⟹[cos(1−cos21−cos21−cos2x+1−sin21−sin21−sin2x)]⋅[cos(1−cos21−cos21−cos2x−1−sin21−sin21−sin2x)]=0Using cos2A−sin2B=cos(A+B)⋅cos(A−B)
Therefore, the trivial solutions are of form:
1. 1−cos21−cos21−cos2x+1−sin21−sin21−sin2x=2(2n+1)πWhere n∈N
2. 1−cos21−cos21−cos2x−1−sin21−sin21−sin2x=2(2m+1)πWhere m∈N
The two pairs of answers which are complex will be of the forms as discussed above.
I don't know of a better way to approach this problem.
Log in to reply
Is there any other way? Perhaps, since we know that sin(x) = cos(x) for x = \frac{{pi}{4} and \frac{5 * {pi}}{4}. Or that sin({pi} - x) = cos(x). Do we get any lead like that? I couldn't find any, but you might. Thanks for helping.
Log in to reply
Well, you might get principal solutions like that. But you have to think for general cases while solving problems like these, for example sinx=cosx has the general solution of nπ+4π, where n∈N. As for the identity sink(2π−x)=coskx, I haven't still tried that approach. I would check it out too, and let you know.
I found it online that this is a problem from the All Russian Olympiad 1995, Grade 10, Problem 1.
Log in to reply