The sum of tangents trigonometric identity gives us that
tan(α+β)=1−tanαtanβtanα+tanβ.
By letting α=tan−1x and β=tan−1y, the equivalent trigonometric identity on tan−1 is
tan−1x+tan−1y=tan−1(1−xyx+y).
Let's use this identity to calculate tan−11+tan−12+tan−13. We first have
tan−11+tan−12=tan−1(1−1×21+2)=tan−1(−3).
As such, this gives
====tan−11+tan−12+tan−13tan−1(−3)+tan−13tan−1(1−(−3)×3−3+3)tan−100
By considering the corresponding right triangles, we get that tan−11>0, tan−12>0 and tan−13>0. Hence, the sum of 3 positive terms is 0.
What went wrong?
This arose when I was reviewing the solution of a submitted problem.
#StaffPost
Easy Math Editor
This discussion board is a place to discuss our Daily Challenges and the math and science related to those challenges. Explanations are more than just a solution — they should explain the steps and thinking strategies that you used to obtain the solution. Comments should further the discussion of math and science.
When posting on Brilliant:
*italics*
or_italics_
**bold**
or__bold__
paragraph 1
paragraph 2
[example link](https://brilliant.org)
> This is a quote
\(
...\)
or\[
...\]
to ensure proper formatting.2 \times 3
2^{34}
a_{i-1}
\frac{2}{3}
\sqrt{2}
\sum_{i=1}^3
\sin \theta
\boxed{123}
Comments
Note that α,β is in the range (−2π,−2π) and that tanα=x and tanβ=y. So tan(α+β)=1−tanαtanβtanα+tanβ⇒tan(tan−1x+tan−1y)=1−xyx+y. We cannot just simply take tan−1 on both sides: This operation is only valid when tan−1x+tan−1y=α+β is in the range (−2π,−2π), which might not necessarily be the case.
But of course, if we restrict the range of x,y to be in (−1,1), then tan−1x,tan−1y will be in the range (−4π,−4π), so their sum would be in the range (−2π,−2π) and the equation would hold. More generally, we could also say that tan−1x+tan−1y=tan−1(1−xyx+y)(modπ) (where xy=1). Note that indeed, we have π=tan−11+tan−12+tan−13≡0(modπ).
Log in to reply
It is in fact possible to prove that α+β is in the range (−2π,2π) iff xy<1, so tan−1x+tan−1y=tan−1(1−xyx+y) if xy<1. It is also not difficult to show that tan−1x+tan−1y=tan−1(1−xyx+y)+π if xy>1 and both x,y are positive, while tan−1x+tan−1y=tan−1(1−xyx+y)−π if xy>1 and both x,y are negative.
The key reason for this behavior is the fact that the trigonometric functions are periodic, and therefore, not injective. Hence their inverse mappings are not functions unless they are restricted to a particular branch.
A simple analogy is the behavior of the function f:R→R,f(x)=x2. The inverse mapping, f−1(x)=x1/2, has two images for each nonzero x, because f(−x)=f(x) for all x. Similarly, because tan(θ+kπ)=tanθ for all integers k, there are infinitely many angles whose tangent is equal to some given value.
It is possible to regard the inverse tangent as a mapping of a number to a set: for instance, if tanθ=z, then tan−1z={θ+kπ:k∈Z}. Then there is no contradiction, because tan−10={…,−2π,−π,0,π,2π,…}.
Further consideration of the above leads us to conclude that the claim that tan−11>0 contains an unstated assumption, namely that a particular branch of the inverse tangent is chosen (e.g., −π/2<tan−1z<π/2 ). But of course, tan−3π/4=1 just as much as tanπ/4=1.
From a group- or number-theoretic standpoint, we are actually looking at equivalence classes of the inverse tangent, modulo π. If a+b≡c(modm), that does not necessarily mean that a+b=c, because a,b,c are representatives of their respective equivalence classes modulo m.
Trigometry? I suppose Trigonometry?
Log in to reply
Stop highlighting grammatical errors stupidly.
You can't use this formula for arctanx and arctany if xy>1, which in this case, holds as 2x1=2>1. You must write pi + arctan1+arctan2+arctan3 = pi.
Log in to reply
Why must we write it that way? How do you know that it is not equal to −π or 2π or something else?
Its well known that atan(1)+atan(2)+atan(3)=pi. The issue occurs because of the restricted range of the arc tangent function.
because in inverse trigometry function range of tan−1 is from ]−π2,π2[ i.e, tan−12&tan−13 not follow the rule of tan−1x+tan−1y=tan−1(x+y/1−xy).
Log in to reply
Why doesn't it follow the rule? Those values still lie in the range of the inverse trigonometric function.
tan−1x+tan−1y=tan−1(1−xyx+y) if xy<1, which doesn't hold in the first case itself,when you evaluated tan−1(−3). Again, tan−1x+tan−1y=π+tan−1(1−xyx+y) if xy>1, which is the appropriate correction to this paradox. These relations can be easily verified, by considering the quadrants & simple manipulation.
Log in to reply
You're right about the part where tan−1x+tan−1y=tan−1(1−xyx+y) if xy<1. But one thing to note: tan−1x+tan−1y=π+tan−1(1−xyx+y) holds only if xy>1 and both x,y are positive. It does not hold when both x,y are negative. When both x,y are negative and we have xy>1, we should use tan−1x+tan−1y=tan−1(1−xyx+y)−π instead.
Simply speaking, the "equivalent trigonometric identity" mentioned is not in fact, an identity at all. This is so because the range of the left side is greater and may exceed the defined range of arctan function on the right. Therefore, it is an identity only while the sum on the left side lies in the range defined for the arctan function i.e. (−π/2,π/2).
Log in to reply
How certain are you that your characterization of "it is an identity only while ..." is true? Are there potentially cases that you missed out? Note that many people are looking at the cases where xy<1. Do they know something that you don't?
We use the fact that tan−1x=2π−tan−1(x1). tan−11+tan−12+tan−13=4π+2π−tan−1(21)+2π−tan−1(31). As 21×31<1,tan−1(21)+tan−1(31)=tan−1(1−21×3121+31)=tan−11=4π Therefore, tan−11+tan−12+tan−13=4π+2π−tan−1(21)+2π−tan−1(31) =π+4π−(tan−1(21)+tan−1(31))=π.
But the range for the function tan−1x is (−2π,2pi).(2π)≤2, so we must subtract integral multiples of π to make it in the range −(2π,2π).
Thus, tan−11+tan−12+tan−13 = tan−11+tan−1(2−π)+tan−1(3−π) = π.
Log in to reply
You have things mixed up. tan−12=tan−1(2−π). You are thinking of tanθ instead, which is periodic with period π.
this statement tan−1x+tan−1y=tan−1(x+y1−xy) is true,. iff x>0,y>0 and most imp xy<1...........
Log in to reply
How certain are you about the if and only if claim? Does it hold for x=−r,y=r, where r is any real number?
Note that the answer will (may) change according to what the restricted domain is. For sake of clarity, let's stick to [−2π,2π).
Ah. Was this part of the submission of the Russell's triple tangent problem this week?
Log in to reply
No, the original problem was rejected, because this represented a huge hole in the argument.
geometrically solving this could probably avoid confusion.
Log in to reply
yeah..perhaps..=((
Please answer my Q G is a group a is an element of order 5 and x is an element of order 2 what is order of x inverse
Well, tan−10 does not necessarily equal 0. It depends on the interval of the angles you want the solution to be in.