Considering the fact that some diverging sums can also approach a certain limit. What is the sum of real value(s) of the expression above?
Details:
If no real value(s) are obtained give your answer as .
If the limit approaches then enter your answer as as well.
About:
This problem is original. Upon pondering over the answer to this problem I wasn't able to come up with a legit explanation as to why my method was/wasn't correct. Please enter your answer with an appropriate explanation.
Easy Math Editor
This discussion board is a place to discuss our Daily Challenges and the math and science related to those challenges. Explanations are more than just a solution — they should explain the steps and thinking strategies that you used to obtain the solution. Comments should further the discussion of math and science.
When posting on Brilliant:
*italics*
or_italics_
**bold**
or__bold__
paragraph 1
paragraph 2
[example link](https://brilliant.org)
> This is a quote
\(
...\)
or\[
...\]
to ensure proper formatting.2 \times 3
2^{34}
a_{i-1}
\frac{2}{3}
\sqrt{2}
\sum_{i=1}^3
\sin \theta
\boxed{123}
Comments
We are essentially calculating n→∞lim1n(n+1)/2=1∞=1.
Log in to reply
Also for any real number n (say) we can say that:
x→∞limxn=1
∵ The above can be written as x→∞limnx1.
∴ As x→∞, x1→0, hence limit of the function reaches 1.
So, if ∞n=1 (as in most cases, the limit and the value mean quite the same thing), can't we say that 1∞=n, which is kind of a paradox. And the only plausible explanation to this is that 1∞ is Not defined.
But if we follow ζ(−1)=12−1, then this turns out to be 112−1 which I'm confused about because the 12th root of 1 is both 1 and −1 (or is it just 1?) and 10 complex roots.
So, what can be the answer?
Log in to reply
Read up indetermediate forms, you did not obey those rules, so your logic is incorrect.
Plus, if you want to invoke 1+2+ 3 + ... = -1/12, then you should make it clear that you're using riemann zeta regularization from the start. Otherwise, by convention, 1 +2 + 3 + ... = infinity
But the string theory tells us that n=1∑∞n (or) ζ(−1)=12−1. Wouldn't that concept be counted right here?
Log in to reply
Think about how zeta(-1) = -1/12 was derived in the first place. Did it apply Abel sum? Read up sums of divergent series.
Even though the limit equals 1, the equality 1∞=1 you mention is incorrect since 1∞ is indeterminate.
Log in to reply
It's correct. The link you gave me have the limit in the form of (f(x))g(x), where f(x) is a non-constant function, whereas my f(x) is a constant function of 1.
Log in to reply
here's a different link to support my statement. Also, this.
Well then,Log in to reply
Log in to reply
I'm disputing the parts 1∞=1 and n→∞lim1n(n+1)/2=1∞ in your comment. You should write it more like n→∞lim1n(n+1)/2=n→∞lim1=1 where the second equality follows from the fact that 1x=1 for any real x.
Log in to reply
Is it just me, but I tried editing my comment but I can't seem to do it. Weird....
Log in to reply
all i see is an infinite number of 1's being multiplied.