Use your imagination!

Do you have any problems that can be solved very easily with an alternative solution using very high-level theorems? I have added one below.

#MathematicalTheorems #Hard #Complex #Easy

Note by Shenal Kotuwewatta
6 years ago

No vote yet
1 vote

  Easy Math Editor

This discussion board is a place to discuss our Daily Challenges and the math and science related to those challenges. Explanations are more than just a solution — they should explain the steps and thinking strategies that you used to obtain the solution. Comments should further the discussion of math and science.

When posting on Brilliant:

  • Use the emojis to react to an explanation, whether you're congratulating a job well done , or just really confused .
  • Ask specific questions about the challenge or the steps in somebody's explanation. Well-posed questions can add a lot to the discussion, but posting "I don't understand!" doesn't help anyone.
  • Try to contribute something new to the discussion, whether it is an extension, generalization or other idea related to the challenge.
  • Stay on topic — we're all here to learn more about math and science, not to hear about your favorite get-rich-quick scheme or current world events.

MarkdownAppears as
*italics* or _italics_ italics
**bold** or __bold__ bold

- bulleted
- list

  • bulleted
  • list

1. numbered
2. list

  1. numbered
  2. list
Note: you must add a full line of space before and after lists for them to show up correctly
paragraph 1

paragraph 2

paragraph 1

paragraph 2

[example link](https://brilliant.org)example link
> This is a quote
This is a quote
    # I indented these lines
    # 4 spaces, and now they show
    # up as a code block.

    print "hello world"
# I indented these lines
# 4 spaces, and now they show
# up as a code block.

print "hello world"
MathAppears as
Remember to wrap math in \( ... \) or \[ ... \] to ensure proper formatting.
2 \times 3 2×3 2 \times 3
2^{34} 234 2^{34}
a_{i-1} ai1 a_{i-1}
\frac{2}{3} 23 \frac{2}{3}
\sqrt{2} 2 \sqrt{2}
\sum_{i=1}^3 i=13 \sum_{i=1}^3
\sin \theta sinθ \sin \theta
\boxed{123} 123 \boxed{123}

Comments

Problem:

Prove that the sequence 1,11,111,...1,11,111,... contains no perfect squares other than 11.

Solution 1:

Notice that every term after the first term is congruent to 113(mod4)11 \equiv 3 \pmod 4. But no square is congruent to 3(mod4)3 \pmod 4, so no term after the first term is a perfect square.

Solution 2:

Observe that

111...11=999...999=10n19111...11=\frac{999...99}{9}=\frac{10^n-1}{9}

for some nZ.(n>1)n \in Z. (n>1)

Assume that

10n19=k2\frac{10^n-1}{9}=k^2.

Then

10n1=9k2=(3k)210^n-1=9k^2=(3k)^2

so

10n=(3k)2+110^n=(3k)^2+1.

But since n>1n>1, by Mihailescu's Theorem, we get a contradiction.

So there are no perfect squares in the sequence except $1$.

Shenal Kotuwewatta - 6 years ago

Problem 1: Prove that 73\sqrt[3]{7} is an irrational number.

Conventional solution:

Prove by Rational Root Theorem. Suppose otherwise, then let x=73x= \sqrt[3]{7} for rational xx, equivalently, we have x37=0x^3 - 7 = 0 . By rational root theorem, we have ±1,±7\pm 1, \pm 7 as possible rational solution, however, by trial and error, we can see that none of these values satisfy the equation, which is absurd. Thus, it must be irrational.

Overkill solution:

Prove by Fermat's Last Theorem. Suppose otherwise, then let 73=pq\sqrt[3]{7} = \frac pq for coprime positive integers p,qp,q. Then 7=p3q37q3=p37 = \frac{p^3}{q^3} \Rightarrow 7q^3 = p^3 , or 8q3=p3+q3(2q)3=p3+q38q^3 = p^3 + q^3 \Rightarrow (2q)^3 = p^3 + q^3 which contradicts Fermat's Last Theorem.

Pi Han Goh - 6 years ago

Log in to reply

Kind of similar, so adding this as a comment.

* Problem 2: * Prove that 2n \sqrt[n]{2} is an irrational number for n>2 n > 2 .

* Overkill solution: *

Proof by Fermat's last theorem. Suppose otherwise, then let 2n=pq    2=pnqn \sqrt[n]{2} = \frac{p}{q} \implies 2 = \frac{p^n}{q^n} , or 2qn=pn    qn+qn=pn 2q^n = p^n \implies q^n + q^n = p^n , which contradicts Fermat's last theorem.

Log in to reply

Hey, did you stumble upon this Wiki by accident?

Pi Han Goh - 6 years ago

Log in to reply

@Pi Han Goh Nope. What a coincidence. xD

I don't really use the wikis. I did see this somewhere on Brilliant though. Much before the wikis. Maybe it was one of Sreejato's questions. I'm not sure TBH.

Sorry for copying your proof.

×

Problem Loading...

Note Loading...

Set Loading...