To Prove: k=1∑∞k2cos(kx)=6π2−2πx+4x2
0≤x≤2π
Proof:
Write cos(kx) as: cos(kx)=2eikx+e−ikx
Then we get S=k=1∑∞k22eikx+e−ikx
Then on using the definition of polylogarithm I'll write it as: S=2Li2(eikx)+Li2(e−ikx)
Now, I'll use the following relation of polylogarithm and bernoulli numbers: Lim(z)=(−1)m−1Lim(z1)−m!(2πi)mBm(2πiln(−z)+21)/z∈/(0,1)
Therefore, I'll re-write S as: S=21m!(2π)2B2(2πx)=6π2−2πx+4x2
#Calculus
Easy Math Editor
This discussion board is a place to discuss our Daily Challenges and the math and science related to those challenges. Explanations are more than just a solution — they should explain the steps and thinking strategies that you used to obtain the solution. Comments should further the discussion of math and science.
When posting on Brilliant:
*italics*
or_italics_
**bold**
or__bold__
paragraph 1
paragraph 2
[example link](https://brilliant.org)
> This is a quote
\(
...\)
or\[
...\]
to ensure proper formatting.2 \times 3
2^{34}
a_{i-1}
\frac{2}{3}
\sqrt{2}
\sum_{i=1}^3
\sin \theta
\boxed{123}
Comments
Alternatively, show that the LHS is the Fourier Series of the RHS for 0≤x≤2π. It suffices to show that ∫02π(6π2−2πx+4x2)cos(kx)dx=k2π, a simple exercise in calculus.
Note that the equation holds for 0≤x≤2π only, a fact that should be stated in the problem.
Log in to reply
Wow. Thanks.
Sir why did you remove your problem?
Log in to reply
I had no idea the same problem was posed before... It can happen to all of us
Log in to reply
Log in to reply
Log in to reply
Log in to reply
Log in to reply
Log in to reply
x and x3 on [π,π]; then take the linear combination that gives you what you want.
Maybe you can try it yourself: Write the Fourier series ofLog in to reply
this your book? I seriously liked it.
Sir isLog in to reply
There is a sign error: We have cos(kx)=2eikx+e−ikx
Log in to reply
Thanks for mentioning it sir. It was a typo. While doing it on paper I hadn't made that mistake.