Welcoming 2016 with a Polynomial.

\[ x^{2016}-x^{2015}+x^{2014}-\cdots+x^{2} -x+1\ \]

has roots , x1,x2,,x2016x_{1},x_{2},\ldots,x_{2016}. Evaluate

(k=12016i=12016(1+xi)k)\left ( \displaystyle \sum_{k=1}^{2016}\sum_{i=1}^{2016}(1+x_{i})^{k} \right )

#Algebra

Note by A Former Brilliant Member
5 years, 5 months ago

No vote yet
1 vote

  Easy Math Editor

This discussion board is a place to discuss our Daily Challenges and the math and science related to those challenges. Explanations are more than just a solution — they should explain the steps and thinking strategies that you used to obtain the solution. Comments should further the discussion of math and science.

When posting on Brilliant:

  • Use the emojis to react to an explanation, whether you're congratulating a job well done , or just really confused .
  • Ask specific questions about the challenge or the steps in somebody's explanation. Well-posed questions can add a lot to the discussion, but posting "I don't understand!" doesn't help anyone.
  • Try to contribute something new to the discussion, whether it is an extension, generalization or other idea related to the challenge.
  • Stay on topic — we're all here to learn more about math and science, not to hear about your favorite get-rich-quick scheme or current world events.

MarkdownAppears as
*italics* or _italics_ italics
**bold** or __bold__ bold

- bulleted
- list

  • bulleted
  • list

1. numbered
2. list

  1. numbered
  2. list
Note: you must add a full line of space before and after lists for them to show up correctly
paragraph 1

paragraph 2

paragraph 1

paragraph 2

[example link](https://brilliant.org)example link
> This is a quote
This is a quote
    # I indented these lines
    # 4 spaces, and now they show
    # up as a code block.

    print "hello world"
# I indented these lines
# 4 spaces, and now they show
# up as a code block.

print "hello world"
MathAppears as
Remember to wrap math in \( ... \) or \[ ... \] to ensure proper formatting.
2 \times 3 2×3 2 \times 3
2^{34} 234 2^{34}
a_{i-1} ai1 a_{i-1}
\frac{2}{3} 23 \frac{2}{3}
\sqrt{2} 2 \sqrt{2}
\sum_{i=1}^3 i=13 \sum_{i=1}^3
\sin \theta sinθ \sin \theta
\boxed{123} 123 \boxed{123}

Comments

Taking a quick look at this during our x-mas festivities, I would suspect that the inner sum is always 2017, so that the whole sum would be 2016*2017.

[added later] We observe that the yi=xiy_i=-x_i, together with y0=1y_0=1, are the 2017th roots of unity. Now

k=12016i=02016(1yi)k=k=12016i=02016(1kyi+....±yik)=k=120162017=20162017\sum_{k=1}^{2016}\sum_{i=0}^{2016}(1-y_i)^k=\sum_{k=1}^{2016}\sum_{i=0}^{2016}(1-ky_i+....\pm y_i^{k})=\sum_{k=1}^{2016}2017=2016*2017

since the sum of the jjth powers of the 2017th roots of unity is 0 for j2016j\leq 2016.

Otto Bretscher - 5 years, 5 months ago

Log in to reply

yes,you are right @Otto Bretscher, please view my comment when you have time.

Aareyan Manzoor - 5 years, 5 months ago

Log in to reply

I thought about it in a slightly different but equivalent way.

We observe that the yi=xiy_i=-x_i, together with y0=1y_0=1, are the 2017th roots of unity. Now i=02016(1yi)k\sum_{i=0}^{2016}(1-y_i)^k=i=02016(1kyi+....±yik)=2017=\sum_{i=0}^{2016}(1-ky_i+....\pm y_i^{k})=2017 since the sum of the jjth powers of the 2017th roots of unity is 0.

Otto Bretscher - 5 years, 5 months ago

Log in to reply

@Otto Bretscher This also would work

A Former Brilliant Member - 5 years, 5 months ago

@Otto Bretscher hmm... i wrote that feature in my wiki "roots of unity" and proved it by the linked note. the same thing really.

Aareyan Manzoor - 5 years, 5 months ago

@Otto Bretscher , please try to solve using Vieta.

A Former Brilliant Member - 5 years, 5 months ago

Log in to reply

My solution is quite short and straightforward.... why should I look for another solution? ;) (I guess I could use Viète to prove that the sum of the jjth powers of the roots of unity is 0)

Otto Bretscher - 5 years, 5 months ago

-1 is obviously not a root. we multiply by (x+1) to find f(x)=x2017+1=0f(x)=x^{2017}+1=0 one root of this expression is -1, and if we put it in the sum,i.e. (1+xi)=(11)=0(1+x_i)=(1-1)=0. so we can go on withput worries. we are just searching for: k=12016i=12017(xi+1)k=i=12017((xi+1)20171xi+111)=i=1(xi2016+(20171)xi2015+....+(20172016)1)\sum_{k=1}^{2016}\sum_{i=1}^{2017} (x_i+1)^k=\sum_{i=1}^{2017} (\dfrac{(x_i+1)^{2017}-1}{x_i+1-1}-1)=\sum_{i=1} (x_i^{2016}+\binom{2017}{1}x_i^{2015}+....+\binom{2017}{2016}-1) gp used here. view this.yes, the sum of all 2016th to 1st power is zero. the (20172016)1=2016\binom{2017}{2016}-1=2016 is left. added 2017 times results in 20162017=40662722016*2017=\boxed{4066272}

Aareyan Manzoor - 5 years, 5 months ago

Log in to reply

There may be a small error in the count (or rather two errors that cancel out). Your sum actually involves 2017 ii's (you have added -1) but you have to subtract 1 from the summand.

Otto Bretscher - 5 years, 5 months ago

Log in to reply

i have said that "one root of this expression is -1...". at the first.

Aareyan Manzoor - 5 years, 5 months ago

Log in to reply

@Aareyan Manzoor So when you add up i\sum_{i} you have 2017 terms.

Otto Bretscher - 5 years, 5 months ago

Log in to reply

@Otto Bretscher i have said why we can neglect -1, reducing a root and giving us 2016 terms.

Aareyan Manzoor - 5 years, 5 months ago

Log in to reply

@Aareyan Manzoor But if you use only 2016 terms then it is no longer true that the sum of the 2016th to first powers is zero. Think about it... you will see what I mean.

Otto Bretscher - 5 years, 5 months ago

Log in to reply

@Otto Bretscher true... the answer should be 201722017^2?

Aareyan Manzoor - 5 years, 5 months ago

Log in to reply

@Aareyan Manzoor No, there is another small error that compensates for this one... you are losing a term 1-1 along the way... the constant term in your sum should be 2017-1=2016, so it all works out... a Christmas miracle ;)

Otto Bretscher - 5 years, 5 months ago

Log in to reply

@Otto Bretscher sorry for late response( electricity...), what a miracle indeed, i have edited it.

Aareyan Manzoor - 5 years, 5 months ago

Log in to reply

@Aareyan Manzoor One more small correction: In your double sum, it is ii that goes to 2017, not kk.

Otto Bretscher - 5 years, 5 months ago

Log in to reply

@Otto Bretscher corrected once again...

Aareyan Manzoor - 5 years, 5 months ago

@Otto Bretscher , @Aareyan Manzoor , I have slight doubt ,

the inner summation will be definitely 2017.

So we need a polynomial whose roots are , 20171,20172,20173,....,201720162017^{1} , 2017^{2} , 2017^{3} , .... , 2017^{2016} , isnt it ?

A Former Brilliant Member - 5 years, 5 months ago

Log in to reply

nope.

Aareyan Manzoor - 5 years, 5 months ago

Log in to reply

@Aareyan Manzoor , but why ?

A Former Brilliant Member - 5 years, 5 months ago

Log in to reply

@A Former Brilliant Member i dont get "we seek a polynomial ...."

Aareyan Manzoor - 5 years, 5 months ago

Log in to reply

@Aareyan Manzoor sorry we need a polynomial , so that we can find the summation using vieta , @Aareyan Manzoor

A Former Brilliant Member - 5 years, 5 months ago

Log in to reply

@A Former Brilliant Member In my approach, I'm not using Viete and I certainly don't need such a polynomial.

Otto Bretscher - 5 years, 5 months ago

Log in to reply

@Otto Bretscher @Otto Bretscher , but please also see the vieta approach ,,, is it right ?

A Former Brilliant Member - 5 years, 5 months ago

Log in to reply

@A Former Brilliant Member Yes, Aareyan is applying Viete to the polynomial x2017+1x^{2017}+1... that works.

Otto Bretscher - 5 years, 5 months ago

@Otto Bretscher I am just asking whether my approach is right ? (by vieta) @Otto Bretscher

A Former Brilliant Member - 5 years, 5 months ago

@A Former Brilliant Member we really didnt use vietas. otto sir used roots of unity, i used a version of newtons sum.

Aareyan Manzoor - 5 years, 5 months ago

Log in to reply

@Aareyan Manzoor But can this be solved by vieta ? according to me it could not @Aareyan Manzoor

A Former Brilliant Member - 5 years, 5 months ago

Log in to reply

@A Former Brilliant Member i think not....

Aareyan Manzoor - 5 years, 5 months ago

Log in to reply

@Aareyan Manzoor Lets try again write a solution on the work that you have done , on vieta approach , then I will post mine @Aareyan Manzoor , @Otto Bretscher

A Former Brilliant Member - 5 years, 5 months ago

@Aareyan Manzoor Aareyan, are you not using Viete to make sure that the symmetric sums of the xix_i are zero?

Otto Bretscher - 5 years, 5 months ago

So am I right or wrong ? @Aareyan Manzoor

A Former Brilliant Member - 5 years, 5 months ago

@Otto Bretscher , do we need to find a polynomial whose roots are , 2017,20172,....201720162017 , 2017^2 ,.... 2017^2016 ? As the inner summation is 2017 @Aareyan Manzoor help

A Former Brilliant Member - 5 years, 5 months ago

@Otto Bretscher ,

Cool problem .... the new problem which is based on our yesterday's conversation ...

A Former Brilliant Member - 5 years, 5 months ago

Log in to reply

Yes, thanks for that suggestion! For square-free numbers the count turns out to be pretty easy... the general case is a mess, though! Nobody has solved it yet... I'm counting on you!

Otto Bretscher - 5 years, 5 months ago

Log in to reply

Bonus problem is complicated though @Otto Bretscher

A Former Brilliant Member - 5 years, 5 months ago

Log in to reply

@A Former Brilliant Member No it's not! Not for a guy like you ;)

Otto Bretscher - 5 years, 5 months ago

@Calvin Lin , what is your opinion for this ? What will be your approach ?

A Former Brilliant Member - 5 years, 5 months ago
×

Problem Loading...

Note Loading...

Set Loading...