This discussion board is a place to discuss our Daily Challenges and the math and science
related to those challenges. Explanations are more than just a solution — they should
explain the steps and thinking strategies that you used to obtain the solution. Comments
should further the discussion of math and science.
When posting on Brilliant:
Use the emojis to react to an explanation, whether you're congratulating a job well done , or just really confused .
Ask specific questions about the challenge or the steps in somebody's explanation. Well-posed questions can add a lot to the discussion, but posting "I don't understand!" doesn't help anyone.
Try to contribute something new to the discussion, whether it is an extension, generalization or other idea related to the challenge.
Stay on topic — we're all here to learn more about math and science, not to hear about your favorite get-rich-quick scheme or current world events.
Markdown
Appears as
*italics* or _italics_
italics
**bold** or __bold__
bold
- bulleted - list
bulleted
list
1. numbered 2. list
numbered
list
Note: you must add a full line of space before and after lists for them to show up correctly
# I indented these lines
# 4 spaces, and now they show
# up as a code block.
print "hello world"
# I indented these lines
# 4 spaces, and now they show
# up as a code block.
print "hello world"
Math
Appears as
Remember to wrap math in \( ... \) or \[ ... \] to ensure proper formatting.
2 \times 3
2×3
2^{34}
234
a_{i-1}
ai−1
\frac{2}{3}
32
\sqrt{2}
2
\sum_{i=1}^3
∑i=13
\sin \theta
sinθ
\boxed{123}
123
Comments
Since it is obviously not an infinite sequence of primes, it should be fastest to check the first few terms.
9997=13×769
Edit 1: By Fermat's Little Theorem, if 9997 is prime, then 29997≡2(mod 9997). But
29997 mod 9997=8192.
You can check this with an exponential expansion of 29997, or with Euler's theorem; both are tedious. In the words of Fermat himself, I would provide the proof, if I were not afraid to be too long.
Edit 2: the note now asks for the tenth composite in the sequence; I have a Java solution which shows it to be 9999999999997 (term 13, implying there are at least 9 more consecutive composites after the first) but proving this seems extremely tedious as I am only familiar with FLT and Euler's theorem. Does anyone have an idea? I know there is at least one more prime in the sequence, for example term 17.
Easy Math Editor
This discussion board is a place to discuss our Daily Challenges and the math and science related to those challenges. Explanations are more than just a solution — they should explain the steps and thinking strategies that you used to obtain the solution. Comments should further the discussion of math and science.
When posting on Brilliant:
*italics*
or_italics_
**bold**
or__bold__
paragraph 1
paragraph 2
[example link](https://brilliant.org)
> This is a quote
\(
...\)
or\[
...\]
to ensure proper formatting.2 \times 3
2^{34}
a_{i-1}
\frac{2}{3}
\sqrt{2}
\sum_{i=1}^3
\sin \theta
\boxed{123}
Comments
Since it is obviously not an infinite sequence of primes, it should be fastest to check the first few terms.
9997=13×769
Edit 1: By Fermat's Little Theorem, if 9997 is prime, then 29997≡2 (mod 9997). But 29997 mod 9997=8192. You can check this with an exponential expansion of 29997, or with Euler's theorem; both are tedious. In the words of Fermat himself, I would provide the proof, if I were not afraid to be too long.
Edit 2: the note now asks for the tenth composite in the sequence; I have a Java solution which shows it to be 9999999999997 (term 13, implying there are at least 9 more consecutive composites after the first) but proving this seems extremely tedious as I am only familiar with FLT and Euler's theorem. Does anyone have an idea? I know there is at least one more prime in the sequence, for example term 17.
Log in to reply
By inspection?
Log in to reply
Yes, it is by far the fastest way to solve this problem, but I have added a FLT solution.
Eg if 999999....999997 (n 9's) is the first term which is not a prime factor, then that term is n+1.
Note edited, sorry.