What does this converge to and why?

What does the below expression converge to and why? 2323232 \cfrac{2}{3 -\cfrac{2}{3-\cfrac{2}{3-\cfrac2\ddots}}}

Setting it equal to x x , you can rewrite the above as x=23x x = \dfrac{2}{3-x} , which gives the quadratic equation x23x+2=0 x^2 - 3x + 2 = 0 , and the roots are 1 1 and 2 2 , both positive. How do we know which to reject?

#Algebra

Note by Hobart Pao
4 years, 2 months ago

No vote yet
1 vote

  Easy Math Editor

This discussion board is a place to discuss our Daily Challenges and the math and science related to those challenges. Explanations are more than just a solution — they should explain the steps and thinking strategies that you used to obtain the solution. Comments should further the discussion of math and science.

When posting on Brilliant:

  • Use the emojis to react to an explanation, whether you're congratulating a job well done , or just really confused .
  • Ask specific questions about the challenge or the steps in somebody's explanation. Well-posed questions can add a lot to the discussion, but posting "I don't understand!" doesn't help anyone.
  • Try to contribute something new to the discussion, whether it is an extension, generalization or other idea related to the challenge.
  • Stay on topic — we're all here to learn more about math and science, not to hear about your favorite get-rich-quick scheme or current world events.

MarkdownAppears as
*italics* or _italics_ italics
**bold** or __bold__ bold

- bulleted
- list

  • bulleted
  • list

1. numbered
2. list

  1. numbered
  2. list
Note: you must add a full line of space before and after lists for them to show up correctly
paragraph 1

paragraph 2

paragraph 1

paragraph 2

[example link](https://brilliant.org)example link
> This is a quote
This is a quote
    # I indented these lines
    # 4 spaces, and now they show
    # up as a code block.

    print "hello world"
# I indented these lines
# 4 spaces, and now they show
# up as a code block.

print "hello world"
MathAppears as
Remember to wrap math in \( ... \) or \[ ... \] to ensure proper formatting.
2 \times 3 2×3 2 \times 3
2^{34} 234 2^{34}
a_{i-1} ai1 a_{i-1}
\frac{2}{3} 23 \frac{2}{3}
\sqrt{2} 2 \sqrt{2}
\sum_{i=1}^3 i=13 \sum_{i=1}^3
\sin \theta sinθ \sin \theta
\boxed{123} 123 \boxed{123}

Comments

As for me, I guess we can make a good observation by iterating it repeatedly for a number of times and observe where the numbers lead to.

For instance, if we evaluate 232 \frac{2}{3-2} , that will give us 22.

Then, if we evaluate 23232 \frac{2}{3 - \frac{2}{3-2}} , it will also give us 22.

Then again, if we evaluate 2323232 \frac{2}{3 - \frac{2}{3 - \frac{2}{3-2}}} , it will also give us 22.

No matter how many times this will be done, the answer remains to be 22.

I don't know if this is a valid approach in finding the value of such infinite nested fraction, but I guess it's a good way to determine the behavior of the function.

Efren Medallo - 4 years, 1 month ago

Log in to reply

Okay, so if you watch the video that Anirudh posted, it turns out that the way you evaluated the continued fraction is "wrong". The way you're "supposed" to do it is to look at the sequence 23,2323,232323 \dfrac{2}{3}, \dfrac{2}{3 - \dfrac{2}{3}}, \dfrac{2}{3- \dfrac{2}{3 - \dfrac{2}{3}}} and so on; that way, we see that the sequence seems to converge to 1 1 . Why we do it that way, I'm still not clear.

Hobart Pao - 4 years, 1 month ago

Log in to reply

It's just by definition that it's evaluated that way.

E.g We define n=1 \sum_{n=1}^\infty as the limit of the partial sums n=1k \sum_{n=1}^k . This means that the value of 11+11+11 1 - 1 + 1 - 1 + 1 -1 \ldots does not exist under our definition.

Sometimes, we may choose to extend the definition to cases where it makes sense (or even when it doesn't).

Calvin Lin Staff - 4 years, 1 month ago

Hmm I don't think that can tell you what my expression converges to, but it does give a hint of behaviour. Unfortunately with the method you used, by replacing the 2 in the denominator with 1, you get the answer of 1, which is why I'm not sure which one is the right root because obviously this expression can't have two different values can it?

Hobart Pao - 4 years, 1 month ago

@Hobart Pao You can get some insight from this video, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=leFep9yt3JY&feature=youtu.be&t=2m59s

Anirudh Sreekumar - 4 years, 1 month ago

Log in to reply

Thank you! This really helped. The answer is indeed 1 \boxed{1} .

Hobart Pao - 4 years, 1 month ago
×

Problem Loading...

Note Loading...

Set Loading...