So I was trying to derive a way to approximate using my compass and straightedge, and then use algebra. I began by creating a degree angle:
So is degrees. Then, I imagined bisecting this angle into infinity. Notice if we draw a segment from to , we get an isosceles. We can calculate for this length using the law of cosines: , where is a reiteration (another bisection). So, if I am correct in my assumption, should be about , if are the number of divisions in the circle. We can find easily enough: . we know this becuase, as we bisect, we get a table of values: . Likewise, we find thusly: . This table of values is found by dividing 360 by : . So to find , we use the law of cosine, take the square, and multiply by n. This gives me the equation: This makes sense from the way I constructed it, but not here:
This becomes: Obviously, . So, I tested with two values of that my calculator could handle. For , (correct to 11 decimal places.) However, at , (correct to only 4 decimal places.) So why does this equation get close to , as it is supposed to, and then stop, and then appear to approach zero? Thanks for the help, I am not all that great at math, and would really appreciate it!
Easy Math Editor
This discussion board is a place to discuss our Daily Challenges and the math and science related to those challenges. Explanations are more than just a solution — they should explain the steps and thinking strategies that you used to obtain the solution. Comments should further the discussion of math and science.
When posting on Brilliant:
*italics*
or_italics_
**bold**
or__bold__
paragraph 1
paragraph 2
[example link](https://brilliant.org)
> This is a quote
\(
...\)
or\[
...\]
to ensure proper formatting.2 \times 3
2^{34}
a_{i-1}
\frac{2}{3}
\sqrt{2}
\sum_{i=1}^3
\sin \theta
\boxed{123}
Comments
Extremely interesting! How are you saying that limit is 0? (Hint: It's an indeterminate form, (0⋅∞))
The correct limit is π, just like you wanted.
Log in to reply
Well, it seemed like as r approached infinity, the cosine would approach 0. of course, cos(0) = 1 and so we would get 0∗24∗2r−2. Since the limit is π, is there something wrong with my calculations? Since the precision seemed to degrade for higher r's. Thanks, I don't have the experience of ever learning limits in school, so I do not realize there is such a thing as indeterminate forms, but I was unsure what to do with the 0∗∞ case. I just assumed for any number, you would get zero. Thanks for the help! :)
Log in to reply
Oh okay, I'll try to explain then. Suppose you had two functions, f(x) and g(x),
limx→∞f(x)=∞ and limx→∞g(x)=0. Now what is limx→∞f(x)⋅g(x)?
If you think about it, you really can't say, because it could be 0 or ∞ or some value in between.
Why? It depends on the functions f(x) and g(x) themselves.
Let me give you some examples. Let L=limx→∞f(x)⋅g(x).
So, we've seen that the limit can be anything really. This is why we call 0⋅∞ an indeterminate form, it can 'evaluate' to anything.
Now, to your question, how do we evaluate limr→∞2−2⋅cos2r30⋅24⋅2r−2?
Here, f(x)=24⋅2r−2 and g(x)=2−2⋅cos2r30 (Understand why.)
So what is L, here?
(Convert 30 to 6π radians)
L = limr→∞2−2⋅cos6⋅2rπ⋅6⋅2r
Let t=6⋅2r1.
L = limt→0t2−2⋅cosπt=limt→0t21−cosπt=limt→0t22sin22πt=limt→0t2sin2πt=π
I used the well-known facts that 1−cos2x=2sin2x and limx→0xsinx=1.
Log in to reply
It's a very common misconception to "Let n→∞ in a specific portion of the expression, while ignoring the rest of it".
Log in to reply
Log in to reply