Disclaimer: knowledge of complex numbers and trigonometry is needed to fully appreciate this note.
Some of you may know the definition of \(i\), the imaginary unit. For those who don't, \(i=\sqrt{-1}\). But what is \(i^i\)? Is it an imaginary number? Perhaps even one step deeper than imaginary, a quaternary number?
In fact, is a real number! It approximately equals .
But how can that be? How can an imaginary number to the power of an imaginary number be real? How did I arrive at that inexplicable answer?
To find the value of , we'll first need to know Euler's Formula.
Euler's Formula states that . The right hand side can be shortened to (just notation, don't get confused), and I'll be using this shorthand for brevity.
Note that when , then . Therefore, to find , we can simply take to the th power. However, since , then
and we are done.
However, the astute reader would notice something wrong with my argument. When I said gives , I was only considering one scenario of the infinite possible that satisfy . What about ? How about ? Any satisfying for some integer would work, and every single gives a different value for . Which one is the correct answer?
The short answer is: all of them are equally correct. But how can that be? Shouldn't , a constant to the power of a constant, yield only one value? One reason that might not give what is expected is the fact that it is to the power of . What does it mean to take an th power? The fundamental meaning of taking "to the power" breaks down when you consider this.
You can make this weird fact more acceptable to yourself by asking yourself: What are all the possible values of ? There are, in fact, two values: and .
Therefore along those lines of reasoning, , given by . Also, , where . , where .
But much like the principle value of , we also have the principle value of , which is when . So, finally, we have shown that does indeed equal .
Got any questions? Feel free to ask below.
Easy Math Editor
This discussion board is a place to discuss our Daily Challenges and the math and science related to those challenges. Explanations are more than just a solution — they should explain the steps and thinking strategies that you used to obtain the solution. Comments should further the discussion of math and science.
When posting on Brilliant:
*italics*
or_italics_
**bold**
or__bold__
paragraph 1
paragraph 2
[example link](https://brilliant.org)
> This is a quote
\(
...\)
or\[
...\]
to ensure proper formatting.2 \times 3
2^{34}
a_{i-1}
\frac{2}{3}
\sqrt{2}
\sum_{i=1}^3
\sin \theta
\boxed{123}
Comments
Thanks for reading through my second #CosinesGroup post, this time about imaginary powers (specifically ii). I hope you all found it quite intriguing and informative. If you have any questions or feedback, feel free to post.
Cheers!
I know this probably isn't fit for #CosinesGroup, but I'll post it anyways. Just recall that for complex x,y, we can define xy=exp(ylogx). Also, remember that the complex logarithm is defined as logx=log∣x∣+iarg∣x∣. So if we fix the range of the argument then we can perfectly well define xy as we wish.
Just sub in the values of x,y=i to get:
ii=exp(−argi).
And we are done.
Good job!Keep these kind of posts coming!
@Daniel Liu Can you add this to a suitable skill in the Complex Numbers Wiki? Thanks
Thank you very much..amazing note..I was discussing this concept with my friends in my coaching classes..now I understand it completely..thank u sir..@Daniel Liu
Great post. You get an A+ for the math and A- for English: it's "principal" (not "principle") value ;-)
I don't think that √4 is equal to both 2 & -2 Rather its actually just 2 since √x is always pos. For real x.
Otherwise , nice thoughts !!!!
Log in to reply
Yeah it is principal root
What is the square root of -4
Log in to reply
2i
Log in to reply
Also -2i
Log in to reply
Log in to reply
What is the value of ixi
Log in to reply
-1
wait ixi = i^2(x) = -1x = -x
e^pi ~ 9 if we take the i-th power we get -1 according e^pi^i+1=0. Why?
Log in to reply
eiπ =cos(π)+i×sin(π) =−1
Log(I) has the value of about 0.68. I’m not a mathematician, and I’m not smart enough too work out how they worked that out.
But unless they are wrong and just making shit up...
Let x = i^i
Log(x) = log(i^i) = i * log(i) = 0.68 * i
Log(log(x)) = log(log(i^i)) = log (0.68 * i) = log(0.68) + log(I) = -0.38 + 0.68
Log(log(i^i)) ~= 0.3
i^i = e^e^0.3 >= 1
Log in to reply
log(i) has a value of approximately 0.68i, which would give: x = i^i log(x) = ilog(i) = ii*0.68 = -0.68 x = 10^(-0.68) = approximately 0.2079
Note: log is base 10, while complex numbers usually are written with base e; which would be ln
What's missing in this presentation is a reminder what seems like a contradiction in the rules of exponentiation. Since all the species in the exponential form of i are being raised by i, that, by real-number doctrine instructs that all species in the exponent are multiplied by i. That would make the new expression e^(-pi/2)*i. That, in turn, if re-expressed in rectangular format is -i.
The only rationale I can find for avoiding this outcome is to invoke DeMoivre's formula, where only the real number value (pi/2) is not addressed by the exponent, i. So, pi/2 remains pi/2 and i becomes i-squared or simply -1. This converts a complex number to real number, ..207 and all its cousins.
What is \cis?
so, what is the modulus and argument?
Log in to reply
The argument of a complex number is the degrees (in theta) that it has when written in polar form. The modulus of a complex number is Sqrt(Re(z) ^2 + Im(z) ^2), or for any complex number a+bi, the modulus equals the square root of (a^2 + b^2). The modulus of a complex number z can be written as |z|. It's sort of like the magnitude of z, or the distance from z to the origin, when graphed on the complex plane.