This discussion board is a place to discuss our Daily Challenges and the math and science
related to those challenges. Explanations are more than just a solution — they should
explain the steps and thinking strategies that you used to obtain the solution. Comments
should further the discussion of math and science.
When posting on Brilliant:
Use the emojis to react to an explanation, whether you're congratulating a job well done , or just really confused .
Ask specific questions about the challenge or the steps in somebody's explanation. Well-posed questions can add a lot to the discussion, but posting "I don't understand!" doesn't help anyone.
Try to contribute something new to the discussion, whether it is an extension, generalization or other idea related to the challenge.
Stay on topic — we're all here to learn more about math and science, not to hear about your favorite get-rich-quick scheme or current world events.
Markdown
Appears as
*italics* or _italics_
italics
**bold** or __bold__
bold
- bulleted - list
bulleted
list
1. numbered 2. list
numbered
list
Note: you must add a full line of space before and after lists for them to show up correctly
Did you see the term: 2 x 4 x 9/2? if we cancel 2 then the answer will be 39 but when we multiply the numerators, it is equal to 29. So maybe it is the mistake
Easy Math Editor
This discussion board is a place to discuss our Daily Challenges and the math and science related to those challenges. Explanations are more than just a solution — they should explain the steps and thinking strategies that you used to obtain the solution. Comments should further the discussion of math and science.
When posting on Brilliant:
*italics*
or_italics_
**bold**
or__bold__
paragraph 1
paragraph 2
[example link](https://brilliant.org)
> This is a quote
\(
...\)
or\[
...\]
to ensure proper formatting.2 \times 3
2^{34}
a_{i-1}
\frac{2}{3}
\sqrt{2}
\sum_{i=1}^3
\sin \theta
\boxed{123}
Comments
There's a subtle mistake in there.
Here's a cryptic hint that might help:
Is x2 always equal to x?
Log in to reply
exactly..but the usage of (a-b)^2 somehow disguises this.
You can't write (4-9/2) as square root of (4-9/2)^2. That is the mistake.
Log in to reply
Why not?
Log in to reply
Ram Prakash is right. 4−29 is not equal to (4−29)2. This is what I hinted at in my initial comment.
Since 4−9/2 is negative, while (4−9/2)2 is positive.
Log in to reply
Log in to reply
Log in to reply
−(5−29)2 we will get −5+29+29=4So, it is proved that 2+2=4 and not 5
Look at the last. Assuming the mistake that it isWhere is your proof ??
Log in to reply
it's an external link. Click on the heading of this discussion.
It is wrong because x2 is not always equal to x. It has two values, that are x and −x
Log in to reply
You should be careful about what you write. x2 [the principal square-root of x2] does not have two values.
Take this for example: what is (1−3)2. Is it (1−3)? Or is it −(1−3)? Or is it both?
According to you, both of these should be correct. Are they?
Also see the solutions for this problem where almost all of them make this same mistake.
Log in to reply
Mmm, that got me.
exactly..but in the subsequent steps, (a-b)^2 disguises this.
sqrt( x^2 ) is always | x |
I think so that the square roots can't be split...
(4−29)=−21
but,
(5−29)=21
in this proof we wrote--
2+2=4−29+29...........step(i)
=(5−29)2+29..........step(viii)
=5−29+29..........step(ix)
so,what we actually doing is
−21+29=21+29..............consider step (i) and (ix)
this is where we made mistake.
So in this case at the time of removing square root of (5−29)2
we need to consider (5−29)2=−(5−29)
Log in to reply
ok..i understood thanks.
Log in to reply
Careful! Gypsy's last statement is incorrect.
(5−29)2 is not equal to −(5−29).
However, (4−29)2=−(4−29).
(5−29)2 is not equal to −(5−29)
You cant make a negative number positive by just squaring it and taking root. I'm talking about 2nd step, (4-(9/2))
Log in to reply
thanks
x2=∣x∣ not x.
(4−29)2 is not equal to 4−29
Log in to reply
thanks
Did you see the term: 2 x 4 x 9/2? if we cancel 2 then the answer will be 39 but when we multiply the numerators, it is equal to 29. So maybe it is the mistake
Log in to reply
No,the calculation is2×4×29.If we cancel the 2's,then it becomes 4×9=36 and if we multiply the numerators it is 272=36. So this is not the mistake.
No sir, i don't think so.