This discussion board is a place to discuss our Daily Challenges and the math and science
related to those challenges. Explanations are more than just a solution — they should
explain the steps and thinking strategies that you used to obtain the solution. Comments
should further the discussion of math and science.
When posting on Brilliant:
Use the emojis to react to an explanation, whether you're congratulating a job well done , or just really confused .
Ask specific questions about the challenge or the steps in somebody's explanation. Well-posed questions can add a lot to the discussion, but posting "I don't understand!" doesn't help anyone.
Try to contribute something new to the discussion, whether it is an extension, generalization or other idea related to the challenge.
Stay on topic — we're all here to learn more about math and science, not to hear about your favorite get-rich-quick scheme or current world events.
Markdown
Appears as
*italics* or _italics_
italics
**bold** or __bold__
bold
- bulleted - list
bulleted
list
1. numbered 2. list
numbered
list
Note: you must add a full line of space before and after lists for them to show up correctly
Right now the leader board is ranked by who has the most points in your level so far that week, with ties being broken by lifetime points. That is why people who solve problems early, climb up the leaderboard, and then get edged out. We are looking into changing this in the near future.
We are considering just listing everyone who has solved all four problems per category in the week. In this system we might make the order their faces are displayed random, or we might rank them in order of solution upvotes, we are still debating.
What do you think would be the best way to award glory and celebrate interesting people on Brilliant?
@Peter Taylor
–
I like the idea that everybody gets displayed who solves all four problems, and I also like the idea that people are ranked by solution upvotes.
@Peter Taylor
–
The primary reform should be that you should consider points for problems solved in that particular topic whose leader board is shown , not all the lifetime points. Different people are good at different topics.
@William Cui
–
For the record, William we side with Jatin on this one. We believe it should be easier to see the achievements of people of different levels, but we do not think it is a good idea to rank everyone in one long list.
Huh? I solved all 4 problems for combo3 and I have more lifetime points than the first place person but I am not even in the top 20... (this happened a couple times)
The current system doesn't seem too bad, though I guess it would make more sense to use points in that level and that category for each category's ranking, with overall points per week and then lifetime points for ties.
Yeah the current system isn't too bad, but it could be a lot better, and we intend to improve it. The current system made a lot of sense when we were a young site. These days the leaderboard has evolved to just be a ranking of lifetime points. While that is an interesting and valuable thing to look at, it does not change that much, and it is not the most interesting way to celebrate what people are achieving on Brilliant every week.
Easy Math Editor
This discussion board is a place to discuss our Daily Challenges and the math and science related to those challenges. Explanations are more than just a solution — they should explain the steps and thinking strategies that you used to obtain the solution. Comments should further the discussion of math and science.
When posting on Brilliant:
*italics*
or_italics_
**bold**
or__bold__
paragraph 1
paragraph 2
[example link](https://brilliant.org)
> This is a quote
\(
...\)
or\[
...\]
to ensure proper formatting.2 \times 3
2^{34}
a_{i-1}
\frac{2}{3}
\sqrt{2}
\sum_{i=1}^3
\sin \theta
\boxed{123}
Comments
Actually,i don't know about that,but,solve all your problem maybe can make you get a rankings on challenges
Hi Arjun,
Right now the leader board is ranked by who has the most points in your level so far that week, with ties being broken by lifetime points. That is why people who solve problems early, climb up the leaderboard, and then get edged out. We are looking into changing this in the near future.
Log in to reply
Hi, can you please tell the future criteria?
Shouldn't we get some weightage for submitted solutions in that particular topic ?
Log in to reply
Well we are still deciding...
We are considering just listing everyone who has solved all four problems per category in the week. In this system we might make the order their faces are displayed random, or we might rank them in order of solution upvotes, we are still debating.
What do you think would be the best way to award glory and celebrate interesting people on Brilliant?
Log in to reply
Log in to reply
Log in to reply
Log in to reply
Log in to reply
Huh? I solved all 4 problems for combo3 and I have more lifetime points than the first place person but I am not even in the top 20... (this happened a couple times)
Log in to reply
Well, that is probably not the criteria for getting on the leaderboard then...
Thanks.
The current system doesn't seem too bad, though I guess it would make more sense to use points in that level and that category for each category's ranking, with overall points per week and then lifetime points for ties.
Log in to reply
Yeah the current system isn't too bad, but it could be a lot better, and we intend to improve it. The current system made a lot of sense when we were a young site. These days the leaderboard has evolved to just be a ranking of lifetime points. While that is an interesting and valuable thing to look at, it does not change that much, and it is not the most interesting way to celebrate what people are achieving on Brilliant every week.