This discussion board is a place to discuss our Daily Challenges and the math and science
related to those challenges. Explanations are more than just a solution — they should
explain the steps and thinking strategies that you used to obtain the solution. Comments
should further the discussion of math and science.
When posting on Brilliant:
Use the emojis to react to an explanation, whether you're congratulating a job well done , or just really confused .
Ask specific questions about the challenge or the steps in somebody's explanation. Well-posed questions can add a lot to the discussion, but posting "I don't understand!" doesn't help anyone.
Try to contribute something new to the discussion, whether it is an extension, generalization or other idea related to the challenge.
Stay on topic — we're all here to learn more about math and science, not to hear about your favorite get-rich-quick scheme or current world events.
Markdown
Appears as
*italics* or _italics_
italics
**bold** or __bold__
bold
- bulleted - list
bulleted
list
1. numbered 2. list
numbered
list
Note: you must add a full line of space before and after lists for them to show up correctly
So your calculator has to have more precision than that. I know which is larger, but don't have a helpful answer as to why, or why they are so close. I'm looking forward to further discussion...
You can always construct rational numbers that are arbitrarily close to a given irrational number.
There are some specific cases where a rational number may have some basis in a series expansion or something else interesting. I haven't figured anything special out in this case, but I don't have much experience doing something like that.
I hope we'll get some more insight here eventually.
Easy Math Editor
This discussion board is a place to discuss our Daily Challenges and the math and science related to those challenges. Explanations are more than just a solution — they should explain the steps and thinking strategies that you used to obtain the solution. Comments should further the discussion of math and science.
When posting on Brilliant:
*italics*
or_italics_
**bold**
or__bold__
paragraph 1
paragraph 2
[example link](https://brilliant.org)
> This is a quote
\(
...\)
or\[
...\]
to ensure proper formatting.2 \times 3
2^{34}
a_{i-1}
\frac{2}{3}
\sqrt{2}
\sum_{i=1}^3
\sin \theta
\boxed{123}
Comments
I took the value of e till 6 decimal places and I observed that e was smaller than the rational no.
Though, it's a very close case and if we increase the value of decimal places of e, we might get closer look.
Unfortunately, my calculator isn't that advanced.
It's a great question and observation. I am eager to know the answer!
They are the same to 17 digits: 1093.914876600000
So your calculator has to have more precision than that. I know which is larger, but don't have a helpful answer as to why, or why they are so close. I'm looking forward to further discussion...
Log in to reply
Even 22/7 is close to pi but not to that much accuracy and precision as this number is close to 'e'
Log in to reply
You can always construct rational numbers that are arbitrarily close to a given irrational number.
There are some specific cases where a rational number may have some basis in a series expansion or something else interesting. I haven't figured anything special out in this case, but I don't have much experience doing something like that.
I hope we'll get some more insight here eventually.
Log in to reply
I agree that we will learn something interesting here. I am thankful to Mr. Pi Han Goh for posting this wonderful relationship.
e7−e=1093.9148765999995540283599508167687699444618877399
34358593758537274=1093.9148766000001746288191686562225050562319350125
I calculate it using a website.
Here I can see the second one is a bit greater than first.