While thinking up interesting problems, I stumbled upon this interesting fact:
If for some positive integer then can be expressed as the product of three distinct positive integers that form an arithmetic sequence.
For instance, when we have When we have
This statement is relatively easy to prove with some algebraic manipulation, but I'm having a lot of trouble with the converse. If can be expressed as a product of three positive integers that form an arithmetic sequence, then must for some positive integer ? If not, what are the counterexamples? I'd appreciate it if anyone here can provide some information about this!
Easy Math Editor
This discussion board is a place to discuss our Daily Challenges and the math and science related to those challenges. Explanations are more than just a solution — they should explain the steps and thinking strategies that you used to obtain the solution. Comments should further the discussion of math and science.
When posting on Brilliant:
*italics*
or_italics_
**bold**
or__bold__
paragraph 1
paragraph 2
[example link](https://brilliant.org)
> This is a quote
\(
...\)
or\[
...\]
to ensure proper formatting.2 \times 3
2^{34}
a_{i-1}
\frac{2}{3}
\sqrt{2}
\sum_{i=1}^3
\sin \theta
\boxed{123}
Comments
If x=3n2, then x3+1=(3n2)3+1=(3n2−3n+1)(3n2+1)(3n2+3n+1)
Log in to reply
Yeah, that’s how you prove the statement, but I’m asking about the converse.
The converse is not true. Some counterexamples are:
7193+1=189×1040×1891
7193+1=70×1647×3224
10043+1=67×2765×5463
16553+1=621×2072×3523
27363+1=1142×1939×2736
and so on.
Log in to reply
Interesting. Is there an explicit formula or recursive definition to quantify all the counterexamples?
Write x3+1=(n−a)n(n+a)=n3−a2n. Write x=n−b. Then we get the equation 3bn2−(a2+3b2)n+(b3−1)=0. Your case is b=1, which leads to n=3a2+1 and x=3a2.
But there are plenty of other solutions, e.g. b=321, a=851, n=1040.
In general, this equation describes a cubic surface (or, more accurately, an affine open subset of a cubic surface) on which we are looking for integral points. This seems like it's pretty hard in general...
Well, let's try a different value for x. I will use the derivative of x, which is dx/dn=6n. Now the value of x3+1 has a different value for x.
Now let's put 2 in for n again. x still remains equal to 12, as 12=6∗2. Once again we have 123+1=7∗13∗19.
However, putting 5 in for x upholds x=30=6∗5. Now we have a whole different scenario. The equation is now 303+1=27001, which is only divisible by 1. Therefore, the arithmetic sequence a∗b∗c cannot output a value 27001.
I hope this helps. :)
Log in to reply
I'm not sure what you're doing here. From what I can tell, you defined the function x(n)=3n2, took its derivative, then claimed that if x′(n)=k, then x(n)=k as well. However, that last part isn't true; x′(n)=x(n) only for functions of the form Cen. Can you clarify for me?
Log in to reply
You're asking if the value x=3n2 for any positive integer n has to be in order for x3+1 to be a product of three integers. I'm showing that x3+1 cannot be a product of three integer, such that A) n is a positive integer, and B) x is any equation other than 3n2. What I did was I assigned a different value for x then did the math to see if x3+1 can be a product of three integers. For some equations, this is not always the case.
This might not always be true, though. Try doing the same process, such that x=an2 and a is an integer other than 3.
I have a problem x3+1=6 then x3=5 so x is not even an integer.Pls explain what do u mean by converse.
Log in to reply
The converse reverses the two parts of the conditional. So for the conditional "If x=3n2 for some positive integer n, then x3+1 can be expressed as the product of three distinct positive integers that form an arithmetic sequence," its converse would be "If x3+1 can be expressed as the product of three distinct positive integers that form an arithmetic sequence, then x=3n2 for some positive integer n."
Log in to reply
that may not be always true by the above example that i gave since 6=1X2X3 (1,2,3 is an AP).But x is not necessarily an integer.
What about when n=1? What arithmetic sequence of integers multiplies to give us 28?
Log in to reply
28=1×4×7