( a 2 − a b + b 2 ) ( b 2 − b c + c 2 ) ( c 2 − a c + a 2 ) ≤ n m If a , b and c are non-negative reals satisfying a + b + c = 2 and m and n are coprime positive integers, find m + n .
This section requires Javascript.
You are seeing this because something didn't load right. We suggest you, (a) try
refreshing the page, (b) enabling javascript if it is disabled on your browser and,
finally, (c)
loading the
non-javascript version of this page
. We're sorry about the hassle.
I concur with @Gurīdo Cuong . Do you mind explaining the first part ?(How do you use AM-GM in such mind-boggling way).
= 3 6 x 6 − 2 1 x 5 + 5 7 x 4 − 7 2 x 3 + 3 6 x 2 ≤ 2 4 3 2 5 6 = n m
Why??
Also,
P ≤ x 2 y 2 ( x 2 − x y + y 2 ) = x 2 ( 2 − x 2 ) [ x 2 − x ( 2 − x ) + ( 2 − x ) 2 ]
I believe you meant
P ≤ x 2 y 2 ( x 2 − x y + y 2 ) = x 2 ( 2 − x ) 2 [ x 2 − x ( 2 − x ) + ( 2 − x ) 2 ]
Log in to reply
I have fixed my problem.Maybe I'm wrong while I am typing
Log in to reply
Expanding x 2 ( 2 − x ) 2 [ x 2 − x ( 2 − x ) + ( 2 − x ) 2 ] gives you 3 x 6 − 1 2 x 5 + 3 6 x 4 − 4 0 x 3 + 1 6 2 .
Log in to reply
@P C – After expanding everything and clearing terms,
a 2 − a b + b 2 ≤ ( a + 2 c ) 2 − ( a + 2 c ) ( b + 2 c ) + ( b + 2 c ) 2
a 2 − a b + b 2 ≤ a 2 + 4 c 2 + c a − a b − 2 a c − 2 b c − 4 c 2 + b 2 + 4 c 2 + b c
0 ≤ 2 a c + 2 b c + 4 c 2 happens to be correct.
However, the way the solution is phrased is easy to cause misunderstanding. Initially, I also struggled to see why the above inequality is true.
can you further explain the AM-GM way please
Log in to reply
Without losing the generally,we may assume that c=min{a,b,c} then using AM-GM
Log in to reply
Wow, you guys really love to solve inequalities problem. You should create a set that have all these questions!
By the way, @Gurīdo Cuong @MS HT @ZK LIn are you guys on Slack as well? It is a forum for most of the active users on this site, where all we do is talk about math and science. Plus, it's free as well! You should try it out.
Log in to reply
@Pi Han Goh – yeap I will try
@Pi Han Goh – Sure, sounds like fun! I have quite a lot of free time now, so I will try.
Problem Loading...
Note Loading...
Set Loading...
Call the expression above is P By applying AM-GM we have: P ≤ a 2 b 2 ( a 2 − a b + b 2 ) = 9 4 ( 3 2 3 a b + 2 3 a b + a 2 − a b + b 2 ) = 9 4 2 7 ( a + b ) 6 ≤ 2 4 3 4 ( a + b + c ) 6 = 2 4 3 2 5 6 = n m So m + n = 4 9 9
Another way Without losing the generally,we may assume that c=min{a,b,c} a 2 − a c + c 2 ≤ ( a + 2 c ) 2 b 2 − b c + c 2 ≤ ( b + 2 c ) 2 a 2 − a b + b 2 ≤ ( a + 2 c ) 2 − ( a + 2 c ) ( b + 2 c ) + ( b + 2 c ) 2 Let x = a + 2 c ; y = b + 2 c x + y = a + b + c = 2 P ≤ x 2 y 2 ( x 2 − x y + y 2 ) = x 2 ( 2 − x ) 2 [ x 2 − x ( 2 − x ) + ( 2 − x ) 2 ] = 3 x 6 − 1 2 x 5 + 3 6 x 4 − 4 0 x 3 + 1 6 x 2 ≤ 2 4 3 2 5 6 = n m So m + n = 4 9 9