2016 Digital Root

For each number n n , we define the Digital Root of n n in the following manner: Take the sum of the digits to obtain a new number. Repeat this process until the result is a single digit.

Find the digital root of 2016 2016 2016 times \underset { 2016\text{ times} }{ \underbrace { 2016\ldots2016 } } .

As an explicit example, for n = 3487 n=3487 , 3487 3 + 4 + 8 + 7 = 22 2 + 2 = 4 . 3487\quad \rightarrow \quad 3+4+8+7=22\quad \rightarrow \quad 2+2=4 \; . Therefore, the digital root of 3487 is 4.

Clarification : In the number above, 2016 appears 2016 times in its decimal representation.


The answer is 9.

This section requires Javascript.
You are seeing this because something didn't load right. We suggest you, (a) try refreshing the page, (b) enabling javascript if it is disabled on your browser and, finally, (c) loading the non-javascript version of this page . We're sorry about the hassle.

3 solutions

Suraj Khade
Apr 12, 2016

Since the digital sum of 2016 = 9 So no matter how many time 2016 is there, the digital sum will always be 9.

Because every multiple of 9 has digital sum of 9...that's why that number is divisible by 9.

Note: The term in the question is actually digitial root . The digital sum is just the sum of the digits.

Calvin Lin Staff - 5 years, 1 month ago

Firstly, note that the digital root of 2016 2016 is 2 + 0 + 1 + 6 = 9 2+0+1+6=9 . As 2016 2016 appears 2016 2016 times in the number we are asking for, then its digital root is equal to 2016 9 = 18144 1 + 8 + 1 + 4 + 4 = 18 1 + 8 = 9 2016\cdot 9=18144\quad \rightarrow \quad 1+8+1+4+4=18\quad \rightarrow \quad 1+8=9 .

Coincidentally, is the same digital root of 2016 2016 .

Note: The term in the question is actually digitial root . The digital sum is just the sum of the digits. I've edited the problem/solution accordingly.

Calvin Lin Staff - 5 years, 1 month ago

Log in to reply

Ok. Thanks.

Mateo Matijasevick - 5 years, 1 month ago

It is not a co-incidence.
Check this out inspired by your problem.

A Former Brilliant Member - 5 years, 2 months ago

Log in to reply

Hi Vighnesh. Can you post the demonstration of why it is not a coincidence?

Mateo Matijasevick - 5 years, 2 months ago

Log in to reply

Sum of digits is 9. If it occurs 'n' times then it is 9 n 9n . For a number divisible by 9 , the sum of digits is also a multiple of 9. So , repeating this process till the end we get 9.

A Former Brilliant Member - 5 years, 2 months ago

Log in to reply

@A Former Brilliant Member Mmm clear. I thought that you had demonstrated when does the digital sum of n n is equal to the digital sum of n . . . n n t i m e s \underset { n\quad times }{ \underbrace { n...n } } . What should I check out?

Mateo Matijasevick - 5 years, 2 months ago

Log in to reply

@Mateo Matijasevick I guess that would be a more complicated problem.

A Former Brilliant Member - 5 years, 2 months ago
Syed Baqir
Apr 13, 2016

2016=2+0+1+6=9 Number of occurance is 2016 which is independent to the answer

\therefore answer is 9 \boxed{9}

y o u c a n a l s o c h e c k \huge{you\ can\ also\ check}

2016*9=18144=1+8+1+4+4=18=1+8=9

0 pending reports

×

Problem Loading...

Note Loading...

Set Loading...