For how many integers with can the polynomial be written as a product of two non-constant polynomials with integer coefficients?
This section requires Javascript.
You are seeing this because something didn't load right. We suggest you, (a) try
refreshing the page, (b) enabling javascript if it is disabled on your browser and,
finally, (c)
loading the
non-javascript version of this page
. We're sorry about the hassle.
For any integer a , we have p ( − a 2 ) ( x ) = x 6 − a 2 = ( x 3 ) 2 − a 2 = ( x 3 − a ) ( x 3 + a ) , so p ( − a 2 ) can be written as a product of two non-constant polynomials with integer coefficients. Similarly, for any integer b , we have p b 2 ( x ) = x 6 + b 3 = ( x 2 ) 3 + b 3 = ( x 2 + b ) ( x 4 − b x 2 + b 2 ) , so p b 3 can be written as a product of two non-constant polynomials with integer coefficients. From these, we can generate a list of n such that p n ( x ) is reducible. For ∣ n ∣ < 5 0 0 , we consider all n of the form − a 2 or b 3 (where a and b are integers). Since 2 2 2 < 5 0 0 < 2 3 2 and 7 3 < 5 0 0 < 8 3 , we have the set of all possible n of these forms being { 0 2 , − 1 2 , . . . , − 2 2 2 } ∪ { − 7 3 , − 6 3 , . . . , 6 3 , 7 3 } . There are 2 3 elements in { 0 2 , 1 2 , . . . , 2 2 2 } and 1 5 elements in { − 7 3 , − 6 3 , . . . , 6 3 , 7 3 } . But the non-positive powers of 6 are repeated in both sets, and since 2 6 < 5 0 0 < 3 6 , the set of repeated elements is { 0 6 , − 1 6 , − 2 6 } . Therefore, there are 2 3 + 1 5 − 3 = 3 5 integers n of the form − a 2 or b 3 (where ∣ n ∣ < 5 0 0 ), so for these 3 5 integers n , p n ( x ) = x 6 + n is reducible.
Now suppose that there exists an integer n ′ such that x 6 + n ′ is reducible but n ′ cannot be expressed in the form − a 2 or b 3 . Since p n ′ ( x ) is reducible, then p n ′ ( x ) = f n ′ ( x ) g n ′ ( x ) for some non-constant polynomials f n ′ ( x ) and g n ′ ( x ) with integer coefficients. Without loss of generality, let the degree of f n ′ ( x ) be not more than the degree of g n ′ ( x ) . Since p n ′ ( x ) is of degree 6 , then the sum of the degrees of f n ′ ( x ) and g n ′ ( x ) is 6 , and the degree of f n ′ ( x ) is 1 , 2 or 3 . Furthermore, since the leading coefficient of p n ′ ( x ) is 1 , then the leading coefficients of f n ′ ( x ) and g n ′ ( x ) are either both 1 or both − 1 . Without loss of generality, let the leading coefficients of f n ′ ( x ) and g n ′ ( x ) be both 1 (otherwise, consider − f n ′ ( x ) and − g n ′ ( x ) ). It is also clear that the roots of f n ′ ( x ) and g n ′ ( x ) must be the roots of p n ′ ( x ) . Finally, n ′ cannot be 0 , so we consider only 2 cases: when n ′ is negative and when n ′ is positive.
Case 1: n ′ is negative
When n ′ is negative, then the six distinct roots of p n ′ ( x ) are ∣ n ′ ∣ 6 1 e 3 k i π , where k = 0 , ± 1 , ± 2 , 3 . Also, we note that, for any positive integer m , if a positive integer c is such that c m 1 is an integer d , then c m 1 = d ⇒ c = d m , i.e. c can be expressed in the form d m for an integer d . This is equivalent to saying: for any positive integer c that cannot be expressed in the form d m (where d is an integer), c m 1 is not an integer. Since n ′ is negative, then it is not of the form − a 2 or b 3 , and thus ∣ n ′ ∣ cannot be expressed in the form a 2 or b 3 . From the above, ∣ n ′ ∣ 2 1 and ∣ n ′ ∣ 3 1 are therefore not integers. Furthermore, any integer of the form d 6 (where d is an integer) can be expressed in the form b 3 (by setting b = d 2 ), so ∣ n ′ ∣ cannot be expressed in the form d 6 (where d is an integer) and ∣ n ′ ∣ 6 1 is not an integer. We now consider three sub-cases, when f n ′ ( x ) is of degrees 1 , 2 or 3 .
Case 1A: f n ′ ( x ) is of degree 1
If f n ′ ( x ) is of degree 1, then f n ′ ( x ) = x − ∣ n ′ ∣ 6 1 e 3 k 1 i π for some k 1 = 0 , ± 1 , ± 2 or 3 . Then ∣ n ′ ∣ 6 1 e 3 k 1 i π must be an integer, so e 3 k 1 i π is real and equal to 1 or − 1 (since ∣ e 3 k 1 i π ∣ = 1 ). But ∣ n ′ ∣ 6 1 is not an integer, so ∣ n ′ ∣ 6 1 e 3 k 1 i π cannot be an integer - a contradiction. Thus, f n ′ ( x ) is not of degree 1.
Case 1B: f n ′ ( x ) is of degree 2
If f n ′ ( x ) is of degree 2, then f n ′ ( x ) = ( x − ∣ n ′ ∣ 6 1 e 3 k 1 i π ) ( x − ∣ n ′ ∣ 6 1 e 3 k 2 i π ) for some distinct k 1 , k 2 = 0 , ± 1 , ± 2 or 3 . The constant term of f n ′ ( x ) is then ∣ n ′ ∣ 3 1 e 3 ( k 1 + k 2 ) i π . Again, this is an integer, so e 3 ( k 1 + k 2 ) i π is real and equal to 1 or − 1 . But ∣ n ′ ∣ 3 1 is not an integer, so ∣ n ′ ∣ 3 1 e 3 ( k 1 + k 2 ) i π cannot be an integer - a contradiction. Thus, f n ′ ( x ) is not of degree 2.
Case 1C: f n ′ ( x ) is of degree 3
If f n ′ ( x ) is of degree 3, then f n ′ ( x ) = ( x − ∣ n ′ ∣ 6 1 e 3 k 1 i π ) ( x − ∣ n ′ ∣ 6 1 e 3 k 2 i π ) ( x − ∣ n ′ ∣ 6 1 e 3 k 3 i π ) for some distinct k 1 , k 2 , k 3 = 0 , ± 1 , ± 2 or 3 . The constant term of f n ′ ( x ) is then ∣ n ′ ∣ 2 1 e 3 ( k 1 + k 2 + k 3 ) i π . Again, this is an integer, so e 3 ( k 1 + k 2 + k 3 ) i π is real and equal to 1 or − 1 . But ∣ n ′ ∣ 2 1 is not an integer, so ∣ n ′ ∣ 2 1 e 3 ( k 1 + k 2 + k 3 ) i π cannot be an integer - a contradiction. Thus, f n ′ ( x ) is not of degree 3.
Therefore, n ′ cannot be negative.
Case 2: n ′ is positive
When n ′ is positive, then the six distinct roots of p n ′ ( x ) are ( n ′ ) 6 1 e 6 k i π , where k = ± 1 , ± 3 , ± 5 . Also, as proven above, for any positive integer c that cannot be expressed in the form d m (where d is an integer), c m 1 is not an integer. Since n ′ is positive and not of the form b 3 , then from the above, ( n ′ ) 3 1 is not an integer. Furthermore, like in case 1, n ′ cannot be expressed in the form d 6 (where d is an integer) since it cannot be expressed in the form b 3 , so ( n ′ ) 6 1 is not an integer. We now consider three sub-cases, when f n ′ ( x ) is of degrees 1 , 2 or 3 .
Case 2A: f n ′ ( x ) is of degree 1
This case is similar to case 1A. If f n ′ ( x ) is of degree 1, then f n ′ ( x ) = x − ( n ′ ) 6 1 e 6 k 1 i π for some k 1 = ± 1 , ± 3 or ± 5 . Then ( n ′ ) 6 1 e 6 k 1 i π must be an integer, so e 6 k 1 i π is real and equal to 1 or − 1 . But ( n ′ ) 6 1 is not an integer, so ( n ′ ) 6 1 e 6 k 1 i π cannot be an integer - a contradiction. Thus, f n ′ ( x ) is not of degree 1.
Case 2B: f n ′ ( x ) is of degree 2
This case is similar to case 2A. If f n ′ ( x ) is of degree 2, then f n ′ ( x ) = ( x − ( n ′ ) 6 1 e 6 k 1 i π ) ( x − ( n ′ ) 6 1 e 6 k 2 i π ) for some distinct k 1 , k 2 = ± 1 , ± 3 or ± 5 . The constant term of f n ′ ( x ) is then ( n ′ ) 3 1 e 6 ( k 1 + k 2 ) i π . Again, this is an integer, so e 6 ( k 1 + k 2 ) i π is real and equal to 1 or − 1 . But ( n ′ ) 3 1 is not an integer, so ( n ′ ) 3 1 e 6 ( k 1 + k 2 ) i π cannot be an integer - a contradiction. Thus, f n ′ ( x ) is not of degree 2.
Case 2C: f n ′ ( x ) is of degree 3
If f n ′ ( x ) is of degree 3, then f n ′ ( x ) = ( x − ( n ′ ) 6 1 e 6 k 1 i π ) ( x − ( n ′ ) 6 1 e 6 k 2 i π ) ( x − ( n ′ ) 6 1 e 6 k 3 i π ) for some distinct k 1 , k 2 , k 3 = ± 1 , ± 3 or ± 5 . The constant term of f n ′ ( x ) is then ( n ′ ) 2 1 e 6 ( k 1 + k 2 + k 3 ) i π . But as k 1 , k 2 and k 3 are odd, then k 1 + k 2 + k 3 is odd and 6 k 1 + k 2 + k 3 cannot be an integer. This means that e 6 ( k 1 + k 2 + k 3 ) i π must not be real, since its imaginary component is sin ( 6 k 1 + k 2 + k 3 π ) and this is 0 if and only if 6 k 1 + k 2 + k 3 is an integer. Therefore, ( n ′ )