This section requires Javascript.
You are seeing this because something didn't load right. We suggest you, (a) try
refreshing the page, (b) enabling javascript if it is disabled on your browser and,
finally, (c)
loading the
non-javascript version of this page
. We're sorry about the hassle.
Great solution (+1)
For Mulrhead's inequality to works or for maximum tp occur, one of x , y and z must equal to zero. That is x , y , z should be non-negative real ∈ R − ∗ instead of ∈ R + .
Log in to reply
But by including zero, we might encounter zero denominator though.
Log in to reply
No, the denominator is zero only when x = y = z = 0 , then S = 0 0 which is undefined and not ∞ . S = 3 the maximum only when one or two of x , y and z are zeros. You can check the wiki, non-negative is mentioned throughout.
Log in to reply
@Chew-Seong Cheong – I agree about the non-negative issue; I just want to avoid the 0/0 issue. Plus if we take one of x,y,z close to infinity limit, can't it bring S close to 3 as well?
Log in to reply
@Worranat Pakornrat – Like I said, the Mulrhead's inequality is correct, the 0/0 case is not the maximum it is just undefined. That is why the inequality mentions nonnegative real because in many problems when a variable has to equal to 0 to achieve maximum or minimum. But if you don't include the nonnegative real, the maximum is not 3 but < 3 and your answer is strictly wrong.
Log in to reply
@Chew-Seong Cheong – Supremum doesn't have to be in the set S. By definition, it's just the least upper bound, and there's no less number than 3 that suits the supremum definition.
Log in to reply
@Worranat Pakornrat – Just read the wiki you referred in the problem. Remark (1): If S is finite, then inf S and sup S are just the minimum and maximum elements of S respectively. But 0 / 0 is not in S .
You can just mention "not all x , y and z are zero".
Log in to reply
@Chew-Seong Cheong – (2) Note that inf S and sup S may not lie in S in general. For instance, if S = ( 0 , 1 ) , then inf S = 0 and sup S = 1 .
For this question, it's not finite set as S = [ 3 1 , 3 ) and has infinite elements. Thus, its supremum doesn't have to be in S but still exists.
Log in to reply
@Worranat Pakornrat – Thanks. But the definition is as follows: [[start-definition]] Let S be a subset of the real numbers R . Then inf S is the greatest lower bound of the elements of S , if it exists; that is, inf S is the largest real number t such that t ≤ s for all s ∈ S . Similarly, sup S is the least upper bound of the elements of S , if it exists; that is, sup S is the smallest real number r such that s ≤ r for all s ∈ S . [[end-definition]]
Log in to reply
@Chew-Seong Cheong – I agree with your definition but what about S = ( 0 , 1 ) .It's infimum and supremum do not lie within interval ???
Problem Loading...
Note Loading...
Set Loading...
Relevant wiki: Muirhead Inequality
From the question, x , y , z > 0 . Hence, 2 x > 0 ; x > − x . x + y + z > − x + y + z .
∣ x + y + z ∣ = x + y + z > ∣ − x + y + z ∣ because if x < y + z then 2 x > 0 ; x > − x . x + y + z > − x + y + z and if x > y + z , then x + y + z > x − y − z or 2 ( y + z ) > 0 .
Since x + y + z > 0 , we can divide both sides without changing the inequality sign:
1 > x + y + z ∣ − x + y + z ∣ > 0 .
1 > ( x + y + z − x + y + z ) 2 > 0 .
Similarly, we will also obtain 1 > ( x + y + z x − y + z ) 2 > 0 and 1 > ( x + y + z x + y − z ) 2 > 0 .
Adding altogether, we will get 3 > ( x + y + z − x + y + z ) 2 + ( x + y + z x − y + z ) 2 + ( x + y + z x + y − z ) 2 .
As a result, we have the least upper bound, or the supremum of S equals a = 3 .
Then according to Muirhead's Inequality , the sequence (2,0) majorizes (1,1), and so x 2 + y 2 ≥ 2 x y . Similarly, y 2 + z 2 ≥ 2 y z and z 2 + x 2 ≥ 2 x z .
Adding altogether we will obtain: 2 ( x 2 + y 2 + z 2 ) ≥ 2 ( x y + y z + z x ) .
Then 3 ( x 2 + y 2 + z 2 ) ≥ ( x 2 + y 2 + z 2 ) + 2 ( x y + y z + z x ) = ( x + y + z ) 2 .
Now since ( − x + y + z ) 2 + ( x − y + z ) 2 + ( x + y − z ) 2 = 3 ( x 2 + y 2 + z 2 ) − 2 ( x y + y z + z a ) and 2 ( x 2 + y 2 + z 2 ) ≥ 2 ( x y + y z + z x ) , by adding up both sides, we will get: ( − x + y + z ) 2 + ( x − y + z ) 2 + ( x + y − z ) 2 ≥ x 2 + y 2 + z 2
Therefore, 3 [ ( − x + y + z ) 2 + ( x − y + z ) 2 + ( x + y − z ) 2 ] ≥ ( x + y + z ) 2 .
Dividing by 3 ( x + y + z ) 2 both sides, we will get: ( x + y + z − x + y + z ) 2 + ( x + y + z x − y + z ) 2 + ( x + y + z x + y − z ) 2 ≥ 3 1 .
Thus, the infimum of S is b = 3 1 .
Finally, b a = 3 × 3 = 9 .