Three unit squares are joined side by side to form a 3 by 1 rectangle, and two diagonals are joined as shown above. Find the acute angle formed by the diagonals.
This section requires Javascript.
You are seeing this because something didn't load right. We suggest you, (a) try
refreshing the page, (b) enabling javascript if it is disabled on your browser and,
finally, (c)
loading the
non-javascript version of this page
. We're sorry about the hassle.
You can also tell that it's a right triangle because the two pink lines forming the 90° angle are perpendicular. In the coordinate plane, one would have a slope of -1 over 2 and the other would have a slope of 2 over 1.
(I don't comment frequently on Brilliant and am on my phone so I apologize for the lack of formatting. Hopefully my meaning is clear without it.)
Log in to reply
Great! Calculating that the product of the slopes = -1 is a good way to find perpendicular lines on the coordinate plane :)
in response to Calvin Lin, tell me more clearly
Log in to reply
What did you find unclear about the solution?
Log in to reply
How Did you say its a right triangle ?
now I understand, but thanks for asking Calvin lin
You don't need the distances to see that it's a right triangle. just look that the angle between the bottom pink line and the bottom black line is the same as the "vertical" pink line and the vertical black line at the vertex. And that this angle adds to 90º
(That's really hard to explain without naming angles, hope it's understandable )
Log in to reply
Please be respectful of the community and avoid swear words. I have edited your comment.
Of course, there are multiple ways to prove that an angle is 9 0 ∘ . Other than the congruent triangles that you pointed out, we could also have used trigonometry.
Log in to reply
By all means, I don't intend be disrespectful. You probably misunderstood what I meant, I was just adding a purely geometric (as opposed to trigonometric) way out. But, please, don't feel that I diminished your answer in any way.
Log in to reply
@Eduardo Elael – I did not misunderstand what you said. I agree that "there are multiple ways to prove it", like the vector dot product above, or the trigonometric solutions below.
My issue was with the swear words that you used in making your comment, that I have since edited out. Please be respectful of the community and avoid swear words.
It would have been helpful if you clearly state that you are redrawing the grid with the angle in question at an intersection, although technically you have moved the 2 x1 as stated you haven't kept the other original line and explained why the angle you are now measuring is the same as the original. Some of us numpties need to be lead through the complete process.
this is brilliant and beautiful!
Treating the two lines as vectors a = ( 2 − 1 ) and b = ( 3 1 ) , we can use the equation a ⋅ b = ∣ a ∣ ∣ b ∣ cos θ .
Rearranging, we get θ = cos − 1 ( 2 2 ) = 4 5 ° .
Loved your solution...cuz I did it the same way..vectors are really cool...!!!
Log in to reply
Shouldnt solution be Cos^-1 (sqrt(5)/SQRT(10)) or cos^-1 (1/sqrt(2) ==> 45 ?
Log in to reply
Yes, that’s the same idea. It seems Michael just reduced that fraction and rationalized the denominator before writing it here.
Shift A F vertically downward 1 unit and re-label as B P , in which case θ = ∠ G B P . Then Δ B P G is a triangle such that ∣ B P ∣ = ∣ P G ∣ = 1 2 + 2 2 = 5 and ∣ B G ∣ = 1 2 + 3 2 = 1 0 . Then as ∣ B P ∣ 2 + ∣ P G ∣ 2 = ∣ B G ∣ 2 we see that Δ B P G is right-angled with ∠ B P G = 9 0 ∘ , and since ∣ B P ∣ = ∣ P G ∣ it is also isosceles, and thus θ = ∠ G B P = 4 5 ∘ .
Alternatively, we could note that
θ = ∠ G B H + ∠ F A E = arctan ( 3 1 ) + arctan ( 2 1 ) = arctan ( 1 − 2 1 ∗ 3 1 2 1 + 3 1 ) = arctan ( 1 ) = 4 5 ∘ ,
where the identity arctan ( a ) + arctan ( b ) = arctan ( 1 − a b a + b ) , a b = 1 was used.
Wow, that definition of B P was nice.
Log in to reply
Thanks! Your question is a nice variation of a classic question. Thanks for posting it. :)
Log in to reply
Thanks. Could you post the question you are talking about please!? I am eager to try it.
sin^_1 (1\ √10)=......... and sin^-1(1\2)=30 >>>>>>> thats true soultion also or not
Log in to reply
Yes, using arcsines the answer is
arcsin ( 1 0 1 ) + arcsin ( 5 1 ) = arcsin ( 2 1 ) = 4 5 ∘ ,
where I used the identity arcsin ( x ) + arcsin ( y ) = arcsin ( x 1 − y 2 + y 1 − x 2 ) for x 2 + y 2 ≤ 1 .
Are you crazy 😜 Brian mad question
Log in to reply
Theta=angle EAF + angle HBG. Tan of theta = (1/2+1/3)/(1-1/2*1/3) = 1. So theta is 45
B C and C F are joined to each other.
We note that by applying Pythagoras' Theorem in triangles A B C , C E F , A B G , A E F , we get the respective side-lengths as B C = 2 , C F = 2 , B G = 1 0 , A F = 5 . Also we have A C = 1 and C G = 2 . Now, on comparing the side-lengths of triangles A C F and B G C we get that
C A C B = A F B G = C F C G = 1 2
which shows that the sides of the two triangles are in the same ratio, implying that they are similar triangles.
So the angle opposite to A C in triangle A C F must be equal to the angle opposite to C B in triangle C B G , so we have
angle A F C =angle B G C ,
that is,
angle X F C = angle X G C
which means that these two angles are in the same segment of the circle passing through X , C , G , F , so that X C G F is a cyclic quadrilateral.
So angle G C F = angle G X F (since they are also angles in the same segment of the circle)
that is,
angle E C F = θ
But we know that angle E C F is 45 degrees since it is an acute angle in the isosceles right angled triangle E C F , where E C = E F and angle C E F is a right angle.
So we have θ = 4 5 degrees.
Note This result could also have been attained simply by inverse trigonometry but I gave a solution using similarity to describe how useful it can be for pure solutions.
Thank you for a thought-provoking solution.
I simple used the trigonometric properties:
We have a triangle and the base angles are from 2 right triangles.
The right most angle, that I will call beta, is from a right triangle with two sides measuring 1 and 3. Thus it's tangent is tan β = 3 1
The left most angle is alpha and have a tangent of a half in this relation (a right triangle with sides 1 and 2).
By the geometric properties, the sum of the angles alpha and beta is the same of the angle theta.
The tangent of the sum of angles alpha and beta will be:
1 − 2 1 ⋅ 3 1 3 1 + 2 1 = 1
Thus the tangent of the angle theta is 1. We know that this angle is equal to 45 degrees.
Thus the answer is 45 degrees.
This is a total basic approach.
Let us consider △ B G H , also since it is given that all the sides are unit.
∴ B H = 3 u n i t s and G H = 1 u n i t s
∴ ∠ G B H = t a n − 1 ( 3 1 ) = 1 8 . 4 3 5 o
Since, A G ∥ B H
∴ ∠ G B H = ∠ B G A (vertically opp. angles)
Now considering △ A E F
here, A E = 2 u n i t s and E F = 1 u n i t s
∴ ∠ E A F = t a n − 1 ( 2 1 ) = 2 6 . 5 6 o
Now, applying external angle property on △ A X G ,
∴ ∠ G X F = ∠ G A X + ∠ A G X = 1 8 . 4 3 5 + 2 6 . 5 6 ≃ 4 5 o
∴ Θ = 4 5 o
You should not be taking approximate angles and summing them up to find an exact answer.
Instead, you should show why tan − 1 2 1 + tan − 1 3 1 = 4 5 ∘ .
@moderator There’s nothing terribly wrong with summing approximate angles (speaking from an engineering vs math perspective). If you were to type this into a standard scientific calculator all at once, it would calculate the first arctan, then the second, and then sum their approximation and round any error in its memory.
arctan(½) + arctan(⅓) = 45°
With enough decimal values, it’s fine.
Only replying to this because I feel the moderator wording was rather harsh (“You should not be taking...”), when a simple illustration of or encouragement to find a more elegant solution would have been kinder.
I’d bet a lot of people solved it exactly as Harshvardan did, plugging into a trusty calculator.
why alfa + beta + gamma=90* ?
θ = t a n − 1 ( 2 1 ) + t a n − 1 ( 3 1 )
There are some elegant methods for solving this puzzle posted here, but here's how I solved it:
arctan(0.5) + arctan (1/3) = 45 degrees
Inspired by the solution to the 3 original square problem using complex numbers:
The 3 by 1 diagonal can be represented by 3+i and the other line can be represented by 2-i. Since we want to add their angles we need to use the complex conjugate of one, so (3+i)(2+i) = 5+5i, which is obviously a 45 degree angle.
α = 1 8 0 − ( 9 0 − θ ) − φ = 9 0 + θ − φ
And
θ = a t a n ( 2 1 ) φ = a t a n ( 1 3 )
Therefore,
α = 9 0 + a t a n ( 2 1 ) − a t a n ( 3 ) = 4 5 °
The angle marked in the question will be the sum of angles A, B shown in the above figure.
We calculate tan(A+B) = (tan A + tan B) / (1 - tan A * tan B) = (0.5 + 0.3333) / (1 - 0.5 * 0.3333) = 1
Since tan (A+B) = 1 we get that A+B = 45.
Answer
It is easy to see that the acute angle formed by the two diagonals is the sum of the acute angles formed by each diagonal, as John Williamson shows. Thus, we can use basic complex arithmetic to find the slope, exploiting the fact angles are added when complex numbers, represented as vectors or in polar form, are multiplied. Representing the diagonals as complex points in Cartesian form, i.e., as (2,1) and (3,1) respectively, their product is (5,5). Thus, the slope is 1 and the angle is 45.
let X, be the angle to be calculated,
let A, the angle between the small diagonal and the top horizontal line, then A =arctan(1/2) = 26.565 deg
let B, the bottom angle between the small diagonal and the 3dt vertical line (starting from the left), then B=180-A-90 =63.435 deg
let C, be the bottom right angle of the parallelogramme 3x1, C=90 deg
let D, be the angle between the big diagonal and the last vertical (starting from the left), then D=arctan (3/1)=71.565
from the quadrilateral XBCD we have 360 = X+B+C+D = X + 63.435 + 90 +71.565 means X=45 degrees
Shift the smaller diagonal to the left so that the red lines now form an angle ∠ A and, along with a base of length 5, a triangle. We can now calculate: ∠ A = arctan ( 1 3 ) + arctan ( 1 2 ) = arctan ( 1 − 3 × 2 3 + 2 ) = arctan ( − 1 ) = 1 3 5 ∘
Since we shifted the smaller diagonal, ∠ A = 1 8 0 ∘ − ∠ X , where X is the angle we want to find, so ∠ X = 4 5 ∘ .
Since the exterior angle of a triangle is equal to the sum of the two opposite interior angles, the included angle is equal to the sum of the triangle made by the diagonals and the bottom side. The angle on the lower left corner is equal to a t a n ( 3 1 ) , and the one on the bottom right is equal to a t a n ( 2 1 ) . These sums add up to 4 5 degrees.
Draw line L1.
It creates a 45
∘
angle (diagonal of a square).
Looking at
∠
A
B
C
and slope of L3, notice it is
1
/
3
of 45
∘
--ie. 15
∘
.
∠
B
A
C
=
9
0
∘
∠
A
C
B
=
1
8
0
−
(
∠
B
A
C
+
∠
A
B
C
)
=
1
8
0
−
(
9
0
+
1
5
)
=
7
5
∘
.
∠
E
D
F
=
7
5
∘
(Opposite angles).
Draw line L2.
Looking at
∠
G
and slope of L4, notice it is
2
/
3
of 45
∘
--ie. 30
∘
.
∠
D
E
F
=
9
0
−
∠
G
=
9
0
−
3
0
=
6
0
∘
.
∠
D
F
E
=
1
8
0
−
(
∠
D
E
F
+
∠
E
D
F
)
=
1
8
0
−
(
6
0
+
7
5
)
=
4
5
∘
.
the two angles on the left have a tan of 3 and 2 the artans total 135 so the vertex of the triangle is 180-135=45. very similar to solution below
Problem Loading...
Note Loading...
Set Loading...
To share the nice geometric interpretation that I came across from others on the site:
We move the 2 × 1 pink line down by 1 unit, and draw another 1 × 2 pink line as above. Now, we see that the green angle is the base angle of an isosceles triangle. Furthermore, since the side lengths are 5 − 5 − 1 0 , we see that the triangle is right-angled. Hence, the green angle is 2 1 8 0 − 9 0 = 4 5 ∘ .