Angle Formed By Diagonals?

Geometry Level 1

Three unit squares are joined side by side to form a 3 by 1 rectangle, and two diagonals are joined as shown above. Find the acute angle formed by the diagonals.


The answer is 45.

This section requires Javascript.
You are seeing this because something didn't load right. We suggest you, (a) try refreshing the page, (b) enabling javascript if it is disabled on your browser and, finally, (c) loading the non-javascript version of this page . We're sorry about the hassle.

20 solutions

Calvin Lin Staff
Apr 4, 2016

To share the nice geometric interpretation that I came across from others on the site:

We move the 2 × 1 2 \times 1 pink line down by 1 unit, and draw another 1 × 2 1 \times 2 pink line as above. Now, we see that the green angle is the base angle of an isosceles triangle. Furthermore, since the side lengths are 5 5 10 \sqrt{5} - \sqrt{5} - \sqrt{10} , we see that the triangle is right-angled. Hence, the green angle is 180 90 2 = 4 5 \frac{ 180 - 90 } { 2 } = 45 ^ \circ .

You can also tell that it's a right triangle because the two pink lines forming the 90° angle are perpendicular. In the coordinate plane, one would have a slope of -1 over 2 and the other would have a slope of 2 over 1.

(I don't comment frequently on Brilliant and am on my phone so I apologize for the lack of formatting. Hopefully my meaning is clear without it.)

Rebecca Rucker - 4 years, 1 month ago

Log in to reply

Great! Calculating that the product of the slopes = -1 is a good way to find perpendicular lines on the coordinate plane :)

Calvin Lin Staff - 4 years, 1 month ago

in response to Calvin Lin, tell me more clearly

Arun Garg - 5 years, 2 months ago

Log in to reply

What did you find unclear about the solution?

Calvin Lin Staff - 5 years, 2 months ago

Log in to reply

How Did you say its a right triangle ?

Vishal Yadav - 5 years, 2 months ago

Log in to reply

@Vishal Yadav What are the lengths of the sides?

Calvin Lin Staff - 5 years, 2 months ago

now I understand, but thanks for asking Calvin lin

Arun Garg - 5 years, 2 months ago

You don't need the distances to see that it's a right triangle. just look that the angle between the bottom pink line and the bottom black line is the same as the "vertical" pink line and the vertical black line at the vertex. And that this angle adds to 90º

(That's really hard to explain without naming angles, hope it's understandable )

Eduardo Elael - 5 years, 1 month ago

Log in to reply

Please be respectful of the community and avoid swear words. I have edited your comment.


Of course, there are multiple ways to prove that an angle is 9 0 90 ^ \circ . Other than the congruent triangles that you pointed out, we could also have used trigonometry.

Calvin Lin Staff - 5 years, 1 month ago

Log in to reply

By all means, I don't intend be disrespectful. You probably misunderstood what I meant, I was just adding a purely geometric (as opposed to trigonometric) way out. But, please, don't feel that I diminished your answer in any way.

Eduardo Elael - 5 years ago

Log in to reply

@Eduardo Elael I did not misunderstand what you said. I agree that "there are multiple ways to prove it", like the vector dot product above, or the trigonometric solutions below.

My issue was with the swear words that you used in making your comment, that I have since edited out. Please be respectful​ of the community and avoid swear words.

Calvin Lin Staff - 5 years ago

It would have been helpful if you clearly state that you are redrawing the grid with the angle in question at an intersection, although technically you have moved the 2 x1 as stated you haven't kept the other original line and explained why the angle you are now measuring is the same as the original. Some of us numpties need to be lead through the complete process.

Robert Markham - 3 years, 3 months ago

this is brilliant and beautiful!

Shakir Ahmad - 2 years, 9 months ago
Michael Fuller
Apr 1, 2016

Treating the two lines as vectors a = ( 2 1 ) \textbf{a}=\begin{pmatrix} 2 \\ -1 \end{pmatrix} and b = ( 3 1 ) \textbf{b}=\begin{pmatrix} 3 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} , we can use the equation a b = a b cos θ \textbf{a} \cdot \textbf{b} = |\textbf{a}| |\textbf{b}| \cos \theta .

Rearranging, we get θ = cos 1 ( 2 2 ) = 45 ° \theta = \cos^{-1}\left ( \dfrac{\sqrt2}{2} \right ) = \large \color{#20A900}{\boxed{45°}} .

Loved your solution...cuz I did it the same way..vectors are really cool...!!!

Rishabh Tiwari - 5 years ago

Log in to reply

Shouldnt solution be Cos^-1 (sqrt(5)/SQRT(10)) or cos^-1 (1/sqrt(2) ==> 45 ?

Nitin Mishra - 3 years, 8 months ago

Log in to reply

Yes, that’s the same idea. It seems Michael just reduced that fraction and rationalized the denominator before writing it here.

A Former Brilliant Member - 2 years, 12 months ago

Shift A F AF vertically downward 1 1 unit and re-label as B P BP , in which case θ = G B P \theta = \angle GBP . Then Δ B P G \Delta BPG is a triangle such that B P = P G = 1 2 + 2 2 = 5 |BP| = |PG| = \sqrt{1^{2} + 2^{2}} = \sqrt{5} and B G = 1 2 + 3 2 = 10 |BG| = \sqrt{1^{2} + 3^{2}} = \sqrt{10} . Then as B P 2 + P G 2 = B G 2 |BP|^{2} + |PG|^{2} = |BG|^{2} we see that Δ B P G \Delta BPG is right-angled with B P G = 9 0 \angle BPG = 90^{\circ} , and since B P = P G |BP| = |PG| it is also isosceles, and thus θ = G B P = 4 5 \theta = \angle GBP = \boxed{45^{\circ}} .

Alternatively, we could note that

θ = G B H + F A E = arctan ( 1 3 ) + arctan ( 1 2 ) = arctan ( 1 2 + 1 3 1 1 2 1 3 ) = arctan ( 1 ) = 4 5 \theta = \angle GBH + \angle FAE = \arctan(\frac{1}{3}) + \arctan(\frac{1}{2}) = \arctan\left(\dfrac{\frac{1}{2} + \frac{1}{3}}{1 - \frac{1}{2}*\frac{1}{3}}\right) = \arctan(1) = \boxed{45^{\circ}} ,

where the identity arctan ( a ) + arctan ( b ) = arctan ( a + b 1 a b ) , a b 1 \arctan(a) + \arctan(b) = \arctan\left(\dfrac{a + b}{1 - ab}\right), ab \ne 1 was used.

Wow, that definition of B P BP was nice.

Soumava Pal - 5 years, 2 months ago

Log in to reply

Thanks! Your question is a nice variation of a classic question. Thanks for posting it. :)

Brian Charlesworth - 5 years, 2 months ago

Log in to reply

Thanks. Could you post the question you are talking about please!? I am eager to try it.

Soumava Pal - 5 years, 2 months ago

sin^_1 (1\ √10)=......... and sin^-1(1\2)=30 >>>>>>> thats true soultion also or not

Patience Patience - 5 years, 2 months ago

Log in to reply

Yes, using arcsines the answer is

arcsin ( 1 10 ) + arcsin ( 1 5 ) = arcsin ( 1 2 ) = 4 5 \arcsin\left(\dfrac{1}{\sqrt{10}}\right) + \arcsin\left(\dfrac{1}{\sqrt{5}}\right) = \arcsin\left(\dfrac{1}{\sqrt{2}}\right) = 45^{\circ} ,

where I used the identity arcsin ( x ) + arcsin ( y ) = arcsin ( x 1 y 2 + y 1 x 2 ) \arcsin(x) + \arcsin(y) = \arcsin(x\sqrt{1 - y^{2}} + y\sqrt{1 - x^{2}}) for x 2 + y 2 1 x^{2} + y^{2} \le 1 .

Brian Charlesworth - 5 years, 2 months ago

Are you crazy 😜 Brian mad question

Mitesh agarwal - 5 years, 2 months ago

Log in to reply

Theta=angle EAF + angle HBG. Tan of theta = (1/2+1/3)/(1-1/2*1/3) = 1. So theta is 45

Gopal Narayanan - 5 years, 2 months ago

Log in to reply

Yes, thanks for catching my typo. :)

Brian Charlesworth - 5 years, 2 months ago
Soumava Pal
Mar 30, 2016

B C BC and C F CF are joined to each other.

We note that by applying Pythagoras' Theorem in triangles A B C ABC , C E F CEF , A B G ABG , A E F AEF , we get the respective side-lengths as B C = 2 BC=\sqrt{2} , C F = 2 CF=\sqrt{2} , B G = 10 BG=\sqrt{10} , A F = 5 AF=\sqrt{5} . Also we have A C = 1 AC=1 and C G = 2 CG=2 . Now, on comparing the side-lengths of triangles A C F ACF and B G C BGC we get that

C B C A = B G A F = C G C F = 2 1 \frac{CB}{CA}=\frac{BG}{AF}=\frac{CG}{CF}=\frac{\sqrt{2}}{1}

which shows that the sides of the two triangles are in the same ratio, implying that they are similar triangles.

So the angle opposite to A C AC in triangle A C F ACF must be equal to the angle opposite to C B CB in triangle C B G CBG , so we have

angle A F C AFC =angle B G C BGC ,

that is,

angle X F C XFC = angle X G C XGC

which means that these two angles are in the same segment of the circle passing through X , C , G , F X,C,G,F , so that X C G F XCGF is a cyclic quadrilateral.

So angle G C F GCF = angle G X F GXF (since they are also angles in the same segment of the circle)

that is,

angle E C F ECF = θ \theta

But we know that angle E C F ECF is 45 degrees since it is an acute angle in the isosceles right angled triangle E C F ECF , where E C = E F EC=EF and angle C E F CEF is a right angle.

So we have θ = 45 \theta=45 degrees.

Note This result could also have been attained simply by inverse trigonometry but I gave a solution using similarity to describe how useful it can be for pure solutions.

Thank you for a thought-provoking solution.

A Former Brilliant Member - 2 years, 12 months ago

I simple used the trigonometric properties:

We have a triangle and the base angles are from 2 right triangles.

The right most angle, that I will call beta, is from a right triangle with two sides measuring 1 and 3. Thus it's tangent is tan β = 1 3 \tan\beta=\frac{1}{3}

The left most angle is alpha and have a tangent of a half in this relation (a right triangle with sides 1 and 2).

By the geometric properties, the sum of the angles alpha and beta is the same of the angle theta.

The tangent of the sum of angles alpha and beta will be:

1 3 + 1 2 1 1 2 1 3 = 1 \frac{\frac{1}{3} +\frac{1}{2}}{1-\frac{1}{2} \cdot \frac{1}{3} } =1

Thus the tangent of the angle theta is 1. We know that this angle is equal to 45 degrees.

Thus the answer is 45 degrees.

This is a total basic approach.

Let us consider B G H \triangle BGH , also since it is given that all the sides are unit.

B H = 3 u n i t s \therefore \quad BH\quad =\quad 3units and G H = 1 u n i t s \quad GH\quad =\quad 1units

G B H = t a n 1 ( 1 3 ) = 18.435 o \therefore \quad \quad \angle GBH\quad =\quad { tan }^{ -1 }\left( \frac { 1 }{ 3 } \right) \quad =\quad { 18.435 }^{ o }

Since, A G B H AG\quad \parallel \quad BH

G B H = B G A \therefore \quad \quad \quad \quad \angle GBH\quad =\quad \angle BGA (vertically opp. angles)

Now considering A E F \triangle AEF

here, A E = 2 u n i t s AE\quad =\quad 2units and E F = 1 u n i t s EF\quad =\quad 1units

E A F = t a n 1 ( 1 2 ) = 26.56 o \therefore \quad \quad \angle EAF\quad =\quad { tan }^{ -1 }\left( \frac { 1 }{ 2 } \right) \quad =\quad { 26.56 }^{ o }

Now, applying external angle property on A X G \triangle AXG ,

G X F = G A X + A G X = 18.435 + 26.56 45 o \therefore \quad \quad \quad \quad \angle GXF\quad =\quad \angle GAX\quad +\quad \angle AGX\quad =\quad 18.435\quad +\quad 26.56\quad \simeq \quad { 45 }^{ o }

Θ = 45 o \therefore \quad \quad \boxed { \Theta \quad =\quad { 45 }^{ o } } \quad

Moderator note:

You should not be taking approximate angles and summing them up to find an exact answer.

Instead, you should show why tan 1 1 2 + tan 1 1 3 = 4 5 \tan^{-1} \frac{1}{2} + \tan^{-1} \frac{1}{3} = 45 ^ \circ .

@moderator There’s nothing terribly wrong with summing approximate angles (speaking from an engineering vs math perspective). If you were to type this into a standard scientific calculator all at once, it would calculate the first arctan, then the second, and then sum their approximation and round any error in its memory.

arctan(½) + arctan(⅓) = 45°

With enough decimal values, it’s fine.

Only replying to this because I feel the moderator wording was rather harsh (“You should not be taking...”), when a simple illustration of or encouragement to find a more elegant solution would have been kinder.

I’d bet a lot of people solved it exactly as Harshvardan did, plugging into a trusty calculator.

A Former Brilliant Member - 2 years, 12 months ago
Darren Peck
Mar 22, 2017

why alfa + beta + gamma=90* ?

Vlad Popescu - 2 years, 6 months ago
Ossama Ismail
Apr 1, 2016

θ = t a n 1 ( 1 2 ) + t a n 1 ( 1 3 ) \theta = tan^{-1}(\frac{1}{2} ) + tan^{-1}(\frac{1}{3})

John Williamson
Jun 4, 2017

There are some elegant methods for solving this puzzle posted here, but here's how I solved it:

  1. Draw a horizontal line through the intersection point
  2. The green angle is now equal to the sum of two angles
  3. Observe that the tangent of the bottom left angle is 1/3
  4. And the tangent of the top left angle is 1/2
  5. Notice that these two angles are equal to the two parts of the green angle.
  6. Add the arc tangent of 1/3 plus the arc tangent of 1/2

Amr Abdelnoor
May 2, 2016

arctan(0.5) + arctan (1/3) = 45 degrees

Joel Dowdell
Dec 10, 2018

Inspired by the solution to the 3 original square problem using complex numbers:

The 3 by 1 diagonal can be represented by 3+i and the other line can be represented by 2-i. Since we want to add their angles we need to use the complex conjugate of one, so (3+i)(2+i) = 5+5i, which is obviously a 45 degree angle.

Juan Ramírez
Sep 30, 2018

α = 180 ( 90 θ ) φ = 90 + θ φ \alpha = 180 - (90 - \theta) - \varphi = 90 + \theta - \varphi

And

θ = a t a n ( 1 2 ) φ = a t a n ( 3 1 ) \theta = atan(\frac{1}{2})\\\varphi = atan(\frac{3}{1})

Therefore,

α = 90 + a t a n ( 1 2 ) a t a n ( 3 ) = 45 ° \alpha = 90 + atan(\frac{1}{2}) - atan(3) = 45°

Thomas Jude
Aug 31, 2018

The angle marked in the question will be the sum of angles A, B shown in the above figure. We calculate tan(A+B) = (tan A + tan B) / (1 - tan A * tan B) = (0.5 + 0.3333) / (1 - 0.5 * 0.3333) = 1 Since tan (A+B) = 1 we get that A+B = 45. Answer

Michael Covney
May 19, 2018

It is easy to see that the acute angle formed by the two diagonals is the sum of the acute angles formed by each diagonal, as John Williamson shows. Thus, we can use basic complex arithmetic to find the slope, exploiting the fact angles are added when complex numbers, represented as vectors or in polar form, are multiplied. Representing the diagonals as complex points in Cartesian form, i.e., as (2,1) and (3,1) respectively, their product is (5,5). Thus, the slope is 1 and the angle is 45.

Takis Psaltis
May 18, 2018

let X, be the angle to be calculated,

let A, the angle between the small diagonal and the top horizontal line, then A =arctan(1/2) = 26.565 deg

let B, the bottom angle between the small diagonal and the 3dt vertical line (starting from the left), then B=180-A-90 =63.435 deg

let C, be the bottom right angle of the parallelogramme 3x1, C=90 deg

let D, be the angle between the big diagonal and the last vertical (starting from the left), then D=arctan (3/1)=71.565

from the quadrilateral XBCD we have 360 = X+B+C+D = X + 63.435 + 90 +71.565 means X=45 degrees

Shift the smaller diagonal to the left so that the red lines now form an angle A \angle A and, along with a base of length 5, a triangle. We can now calculate: A = arctan ( 3 1 ) + arctan ( 2 1 ) = arctan ( 3 + 2 1 3 × 2 ) = arctan ( 1 ) = 13 5 \angle A = \arctan (\frac{3}{1}) + \arctan (\frac{2}{1}) = \arctan (\frac{3 + 2}{1 - 3 \times 2}) = \arctan(-1) = 135 ^\circ

Since we shifted the smaller diagonal, A = 18 0 X , \angle A = 180 ^{\circ} - \angle X, where X X is the angle we want to find, so X = 4 5 \angle X = 45 ^\circ .

Since the exterior angle of a triangle is equal to the sum of the two opposite interior angles, the included angle is equal to the sum of the triangle made by the diagonals and the bottom side. The angle on the lower left corner is equal to a t a n ( 1 3 ) atan(\frac {1}{3}) , and the one on the bottom right is equal to a t a n ( 1 2 ) atan(\frac{1}{2}) . These sums add up to 45 45 degrees.

Draw line L1.
It creates a 45 ^\circ angle (diagonal of a square).
Looking at A B C \angle ABC and slope of L3, notice it is 1 / 3 1/3 of 45 ^\circ --ie. 15 ^\circ .
B A C = 9 0 \angle BAC = 90^\circ
A C B = 180 ( B A C + A B C ) = 180 ( 90 + 15 ) = 7 5 . \angle ACB = 180 - (\angle BAC + \angle ABC) = 180 - (90 + 15) = 75^\circ.
E D F = 7 5 \angle EDF = 75^\circ (Opposite angles).
Draw line L2.
Looking at G \angle G and slope of L4, notice it is 2 / 3 2/3 of 45 ^\circ --ie. 30 ^\circ .
D E F = 90 G = 90 30 = 6 0 \angle DEF = 90 - \angle G = 90 - 30 = 60^\circ .
D F E = 180 ( D E F + E D F ) = 180 ( 60 + 75 ) = 4 5 \angle DFE = 180 - (\angle DEF + \angle EDF) = 180 - (60 + 75) = 45^\circ .








Robert Beasley
Mar 21, 2017

the two angles on the left have a tan of 3 and 2 the artans total 135 so the vertex of the triangle is 180-135=45. very similar to solution below

Sarono Handoyo
Apr 4, 2016

0 pending reports

×

Problem Loading...

Note Loading...

Set Loading...