How fast can you turn around?

A particle at rest starts moving along a horizontal line with an acceleration a a in a particular direction. After time t t it changes the sign of its acceleration . At what time T T will it come back to its initial position?

Let that time be T = K t T= Kt . Find K K .


The answer is 3.414.

This section requires Javascript.
You are seeing this because something didn't load right. We suggest you, (a) try refreshing the page, (b) enabling javascript if it is disabled on your browser and, finally, (c) loading the non-javascript version of this page . We're sorry about the hassle.

2 solutions

Ujjwal Rane
Nov 21, 2014

There are two great solutions here already, so just adding the visual approach using velocity v/s time graph - the area under which is the distance covered.

Imgur Imgur

Consider three areas or distances covered

A1 - covered while speeding up

A2 - covered while slowing down

A3 - covered in the return journey

A1 = A2 . . . congruent right triangles <=identical height and slope of hypotenuse

For a round trip, A3 = A1 + A2 = 2 A2

Because they are both right angled triangles and share a pair of vertically opposite angles, the blue and the red triangles are similar.

Similar triangles with areas 1:2 must have sides t : t = 1 : 2 t : t' = 1 : \sqrt{2} Hence T = t + t + t = ( 2 + 2 ) t = 3.414 t T = t + t + t' = (2 + \sqrt{2}) t = \boxed { 3.414 t}

I really like this intuitive approach, Ujjwal. I should try and use graphic methods more often; I'm too much in the habit of using algebra as my default approach. :)

Brian Charlesworth - 6 years, 6 months ago

Log in to reply

But algebra ALWAYS works while these methods are applicable/cheaper sometimes - especially when the graphs are straight lines (constant or zero acceleration patches) I will try to find and post some old problems that yielded quick solutions this way . . .

Ujjwal Rane - 6 years, 6 months ago

Log in to reply

Yes, I suppose that is part of the reason I usually try algebra first, (even if it ends up being messy). I'll keep an eye out for any problems you post. :)

Brian Charlesworth - 6 years, 6 months ago

Root 2 can not be simplified to 1.414, as it is irrational

Christian Marriott - 5 years, 5 months ago

Log in to reply

You are right. Only here, the expected answer was a decimal approximation. So I used this value for root(2)

Ujjwal Rane - 5 years, 4 months ago

After time t t the particle will have traveled a distance ( 1 2 ) a t 2 (\frac{1}{2})at^{2} and be traveling at a speed of a t at .

Now reset the clock to t 1 = 0 t_{1} = 0 . The acceleration is now a -a , and with an initial speed of a t at the distance D D from the original starting point is given by the formula

D = ( 1 2 ) a t 2 + a t t 1 ( 1 2 ) a t 1 2 D = (\frac{1}{2})at^{2} + att_{1} - (\frac{1}{2})at_{1}^{2} .

Now the particle will have returned to its starting point when D = 0 D = 0 , i.e., when

( 1 2 ) a t 1 2 a t t 1 ( 1 2 ) a t 2 = 0 t 1 2 t t 1 t 2 = 0 (\frac{1}{2})at_{1}^{2} - att_{1} - (\frac{1}{2})at^{2} = 0 \Longrightarrow t_{1}^{2} - tt_{1} - t^{2} = 0

t 1 = 2 t ± 4 t 2 + 4 t 2 2 = ( 1 + 2 ) t \Longrightarrow t_{1} = \dfrac{2t \pm \sqrt{4t^{2} + 4t^{2}}}{2} = (1 + \sqrt{2})t ,

where we took the positive root since we must have t 1 > 0 t_{1} \gt 0 .

To find the total time of travel T T we just add this result to t t to find that

T = ( 2 + 2 ) t T = (2 + \sqrt{2})t , giving us K = 2 + 2 = 3.414 K = 2 + \sqrt{2} = \boxed{3.414} to 3 3 decimal places.

Let us say for convenience time is in sec and distance in m. It moves, say a distance D m in t sec, D = 1 2 a t 2 D = \dfrac{1}{2}* a*t^2 . ....(1)

After changing the sign of a, the particle will come to rest before starting back movement. The distance moved from start to change of sign is D m in t sec, then it will move further D m in t sec before coming to rest, just symmetrical.
So, it has to move - 2D m distance with -a, the time taken is (T - 2t) sec.
2 D = 1 2 a ( T 2 t ) 2 = 1 2 a ( K t 2 t ) 2 s u b s t i t u t i n g f r o m ( 1 ) w e g e t 2 t 2 = ( K t 2 t ) 2 K 2 4 K + 2 = 0 S o l v i n g w e g e t K = 2 + 2 . = 3.414 \therefore~ -2D = - \dfrac{1}{2}* a*(T - 2t)^2 = - \dfrac{1}{2}* a*(Kt - 2t)^2\\ substituting~from~ (1)~ we~ get~2*t^2 = (Kt - 2t)^2 \therefore~K^2 - 4K + 2 = 0 \\Solving~ we~ get~~~ K = 2 + \sqrt2. = \boxed{3.414}

Niranjan Khanderia - 6 years, 6 months ago

Log in to reply

Nice approach, Niranjan. :)

Brian Charlesworth - 6 years, 6 months ago

Log in to reply

Brian, Prof. Khanderia taught me kinematics and dynamics of machines 30 years back and has remained ever since a lifelong guide and source of inspiration. Feels so good to share this space with him!

Ujjwal Rane - 6 years, 6 months ago

Log in to reply

@Ujjwal Rane In that case I am honored as well. :) Small world that the two of you are on this site together; did one of you let the other know about it, or did you find it independently?

Brian Charlesworth - 6 years, 6 months ago

Log in to reply

@Brian Charlesworth In fact it was Ujjwal who showed me this site. He has always been adding something. We meet when I go to India, and are in touch by e.mail. It is a joy to have contact with some one like Ujjwal.

Niranjan Khanderia - 6 years, 6 months ago

Log in to reply

@Niranjan Khanderia I'm impressed that the two of you have kept in touch all these years. You clearly have a high regard for one another. :)

Brian Charlesworth - 6 years, 6 months ago

Thank you.

Niranjan Khanderia - 6 years, 6 months ago

Nice solution sir ! :)

Keshav Tiwari - 6 years, 6 months ago

Log in to reply

Thanks, Keshav. Nice question. :)

Brian Charlesworth - 6 years, 6 months ago

0 pending reports

×

Problem Loading...

Note Loading...

Set Loading...