x 2 0 4 8 + x 2 0 4 8 1 + x 2 0 4 7 − x 2 0 4 7 1 + x 2 0 4 9 1 − x 2 0 4 9 + 2
Find the value of the above expression if we know that x + x 1 = 2 .
This section requires Javascript.
You are seeing this because something didn't load right. We suggest you, (a) try
refreshing the page, (b) enabling javascript if it is disabled on your browser and,
finally, (c)
loading the
non-javascript version of this page
. We're sorry about the hassle.
It's to mislead you.
And how do we apply the fact that 2 0 4 8 = 2 1 1 ?
You don't.
Log in to reply
It is just stating the obvious not necessarily important.
This how i solved it too.. :) Don't know why all others are making it seem as a great question.
Log in to reply
i also did like this, the " fact that 2 1 1 = 2 0 4 8 " is not used anywhere....
TROLL THE OTHER SOLUTION MAKERS
How did you get to
X^2-2x+1=0 in conclusion? ! Sry I'm a young beginner Don't know whether is it silly to ask but i don't know how you get to that ☺
Log in to reply
x + 1/x = 2 Multiply both sides by x x^2 + 1 = 2x Subtract 2x from both sides x^2 - 2x + 1 = 0
yes...I too am curious about how or why would we use 2048 = 2 1 1 ?
Even I did the same!
A no plus its resiprocal =2 there is one university true that each bo should be 1 then according to this 1+1+1-1+1-1 is simply 2
(x-1)^2 = 1 therefore x = 1 or -1
Log in to reply
(x-1)*(x-1)=0 so x ll b ( +1 ) only
Its wrong ...!!! Value of x doesn't even satisfying the eqn. It will be (x - 1)^2 = 0.
Since we don't exactly see how in the world we would get to these exponents, we start small. Squaring both sides of x + x 1 = 2 gives x 2 + 2 + x 2 1 = 4 ⟹ x 2 + x 2 1 = 2 . Then we see that for any $n$, x n + x n 1 = 2 ⟹ x 2 n + x 2 n 1 . So we see that x 2 0 4 8 + x 2 0 4 8 1 = 2 . Now we have these other terms to deal with. Well, we can use ( x + x 1 ) ( x 2 0 4 8 + x 2 0 4 8 1 ) However, this would not give us the negative terms that we need. So we need to find x − x 1 . Since x 2 + x 2 1 = 2 , we have x 2 − 2 + x 2 1 = 0 ⟹ ( x − x 1 ) 2 = 0 ⟹ x − x 1 = 0 . So this eliminates ( x − x 1 ) ( x 2 0 4 8 + x 2 0 4 8 1 ) and we are left with 2 + 2 = 4 .
I have found a rather interesting solution involving complex numbers:
Using De Moivre's theorem, if x is a complex number we can see that x n + x n 1 = 2 cos n θ and x n − x n 1 = 2 i sin n θ .
So in the given formula, n is equal to 1, which allows us to change the initial equation into x + x 1 = 2 cos 1 ⋅ θ = 2
This allows us to solve for θ to get θ = 0.
Restating the initial formulas with this value of θ : x n + x n 1 = 2 cos n ⋅ 0 → x n + x n 1 = 2 x n − x n 1 = 2 i sin n ⋅ 0 → x n − x n 1 = 0
So finally, x 2 0 4 8 + x 2 0 4 8 1 + x 2 0 4 7 − x 2 0 4 7 1 + x 2 0 4 9 − x 2 0 4 9 1 + 2 ⇒ 2 + 0 + 0 + 2 = 4
Log in to reply
very nicely solve but you solve directly without subtituting n=1 by 2cosn@=2 => cosn@=1 => n@=0 => => @=0
You have not proved that x n + x n 1 = 2 for all n ; you have only proved this for n that are powers of 2 (that can be obtained by squaring x 2 + x 2 1 = 2 .
Log in to reply
Oops. Fail. I meant to say power of 2
Log in to reply
It is creary true that x n + x n 1 = 2 for all n (because x = 1 ) Can you prove this fact? (without using the fact that x = 1 )
Log in to reply
@Minimario Minimario – What do you mean? This statement?
( x + x 1 = 2 ) ⇒ ( ∀ n ∈ N x n + x n 1 = 2 )
without inspect the values of x to be ± 1 , right?
Ok.
You can prove it by induction that for every non negative integer k you have
x k + x k 1 = 2
provided that the equality holds for k = 1 .
Base of induction is trivial. In fact equality holds for k = 0 and k = 1 .
Suppose now n ≥ 1 and that the equality holds for every k ≤ n .
We prove that it also holds for n + 1 .
x n + 1 + x n + 1 1 =
x ⋅ x n + x 1 ⋅ x n 1 =
x ⋅ ( x n + x n 1 − x n 1 ) + x 1 ⋅ ( x n 1 + x n − x n )
= x ( 2 − x n 1 ) + x 1 ⋅ ( 2 − x n ) =
2 x − x n − 1 1 + 2 x 1 − x n − 1 = 2 ( 1 + x 1 ) − ( x n − 1 + x n − 1 1 ) = 4 − 2 = 2 .
So by induction we get the proof of our statement.
It is also clear, by reciprocal simmetry, that it is also true for every k negative integer.
@Minimario Minimario – x = 1 is unique solution... this is trivial to prove. Edit: Stahp editting
x^n+1/x^n=2 holds only for x=1
The only solution till now which doesn't assume x to be real. Nice..
Log in to reply
This was the algebraic manipulation solution I meant. You can see my solution that deals with the case if x is not real.
Note that x = 1 fits the original equation; therefore we can see that the expression we want to find the value of is simply 1 + 1 + 1 − 1 + 1 − 1 + 2 = 4 and we are done.
Can you prove this value is unique?
Log in to reply
It's the only real solution because taking the derivative of the function yields extrema at x = ± 1 , but the function f ( x ) = x + x 1 is negative for all x ∈ ( − ∞ , 0 ) . On the other side of the y -axis, the function is always positive and changes from decreasing to increasing at 1 point: ( 1 , 0 ) . Therefore, x = 1 is the only real solution.
Log in to reply
There isn't any unreal solution either, so you might want to try that?
From the inequality x + x 1 ≥ 2 if x > 0 .
You can prove by AM-GM that
x + x 1 ≥ 2 x ⋅ x 1 = 2 .
Equality holds if x = x 1 .
Therefore, equality holds if x 2 = 1 → x = 1 .
I'm feeling mad because I clicked see solution by accident. >:(
x 2 − 2 x + 1 = 0 , or x = 1
used it LOL
Yep, that's all I did :)
There is a solution by algebraic manipulation, but a more straightforward way is to solve the given hypothesis. As x = 0 does not solve the equation, we may assume that x = 0 , and therefore multiply the equation by x , solving the quadratic inequality gives x = 1 . Substitute this into the expression and get the answer 4 . Alternatively use the inequality x + x 1 ≥ 2 which is true for nonzero real x , where equality occurs if and only if x = 1 to get x = 1 . In this case there is a gap that x might be imaginary (not real). Assume so. Since x 1 = ∣ x ∣ x , for x + x 1 to have a zero imaginary part, ∣ x ∣ = 1 , but then x = 1 by our assumption, x 's real part is strictly less than 1 , which makes x + x 1 to have a real part of strictly less than 2 , contradiction.
Actually there is no need to prove x is nonzero.
Log in to reply
Why not?
Log in to reply
Well because I didn't divide anything by 0?
Log in to reply
@Yong See Foo – Confused karne ko diya 2^11=2048.
Since we have : x + 1/x =2 , and in the equation we have two odd exponential value and one even, we can find the value of x^2 + 1/(x^2) for even and also x^3 + 1/(x^3) for the odd one, by this we can find the total value. Even value is 0 and odd value is 2
X+1/x=2 factor x(1+1/1)=2 simplify x(2)=2 isolate (x) x=2/2 solution x=1 plug in x=1 to original equation to get, 1+1+1-1+1-1+2=4
X^2-2x-1=0 Using quadratic. X=1 Substitute. 1+1/1+1-1/1+1/1-1+2=4
If you rearrange the basic information given we know: x + 1/x = 2 So: x^2 + 1 = 2x x^2 - 2x + 1 = 0 ( x - 1 )( x - 1) = 0 Therefore: x = 1 Now we can apply this to the question: The first section gives 1 + 1/1 which is 2 The next section gives: 1-1 which is 0 The third section gives: 1-1 which is also 0 ( similar to second section) The last section is 2 If we add all the sections we get ; 2 + 0 + 0 + 2 which gives 4
1 to the power of any whole number is 1. All you are doing is adding and subtracting 1.
Let x=1, hence question solved
So firstly I differentiated x+1/x = 2 and got x^2=1 , so x =+-1 , but - 1dont satisfy the equation x+1/x=2 so I get x=+1 , now put x=1 in long equation to get that reduced to the value 4 .
x+(1/x)=2 => x(1+(1/1)=2 => 2x=2 => x=1 1+1+1-1+1-1+2 = 4
Looking at reciprocals each denom and numer can be canceled bc of its properties in the problem. Leaving it equaling 2 and adding 2 at the end to equal 4
You literally multiply the equation by x solve for x and then plug in the value into the expression
Wow, so many complicated ways when all I did was switching + to - and - to +... Then just apply -x-1/x = -2 and you can even calculate it in your head : )
That wasnt difficult . Everyone would have solved that in first attempt !!
x+1/x=2 has only one solution . x=1. 1^n is always 1 . And the solution is pretty obvious :4
Problem Loading...
Note Loading...
Set Loading...
I didn't realize what's so difficult here! :/ Am I missing something?
x + x 1 = 2 ⟹ x 2 − 2 x + 1 = 0 ⟹ ( x − 1 ) 2 = 0 ⟹ x = 1
∴ 1 + 1 + 1 − 1 + 1 − 1 + 2 = 4
And how do we apply the fact that 2 0 4 8 = 2 1 1 ?