Flip The Digits

True or False?

Subtracting any 3 digit number from its reverse gives a multiple of 3.

Example: 7 2 5 5 2 7 = 198 = 66 3. \color{#D61F06}{7}\color{#3D99F6}{2}\color{#20A900}{5} - \color{#20A900}{5}\color{#3D99F6}{2}\color{#D61F06}{7} = 198 = 66 \cdot 3.

Note: 0 0 is a multiple of 3 3 since 0 3 = 0 0 \cdot 3 = 0

False True

This section requires Javascript.
You are seeing this because something didn't load right. We suggest you, (a) try refreshing the page, (b) enabling javascript if it is disabled on your browser and, finally, (c) loading the non-javascript version of this page . We're sorry about the hassle.

16 solutions

Jack Rawlin
Oct 12, 2015

Let A B C = 100 A + 10 B + C \overline{ABC} = 100A + 10B + C

A B C C B A = ( 100 A + 10 B + C ) ( 100 C + 10 B + A ) \overline{ABC} - \overline{CBA} = (100A + 10B + C) - (100C + 10B + A)

The above equation simplifies down to:

99 A 99 C = 3 ( 33 A 33 C ) 99A - 99C = 3(33A - 33C)

Since a 3 3 can be extracted from the equation and both A A and C C are integers, the number produced is a multiple of 3 3 .


Note: Since 0 = 0 3 0 = 0 \cdot 3 , 0 0 is a multiple of 3 3 . In fact, 0 0 is a multiple of any integer.

but cant you substract 222 from 222? and 0 its not a multiple of 3?..

Andres Franz Chavez - 5 years, 8 months ago

Log in to reply

Note that 0 is a multiple of 3, since 0 = 0 × 3 0 = 0 \times 3 .

In fact, 0 is a multiple of every number.


What you are thinking of, is likely that "0 is not a factor of 3", which is a true statement. This is because there is no value N N such that 3 = 0 × N 3 = 0 \times N .

Calvin Lin Staff - 5 years, 8 months ago

Log in to reply

If : 0=0 * 3 then 3 = 0/0 this uknown quantity So 0 is not multiple of any number

Hany Kadous - 5 years, 7 months ago

Log in to reply

@Hany Kadous 0/0 is undefined because it exists for all numbers; therefore, it is a multiple of all numbers.

Sarah Gutierrez - 5 years, 7 months ago

@Hany Kadous Sure 0/0 = x

x can be anything. That is why division by zero is "not allowed". Any answer is valid for x/0. x/0 = i for instance. but it can also be 4, e, π, φ, 7/π + √2i, all answers are valid.

Dan Trivates - 5 years, 7 months ago

@Hany Kadous also 0 is an expression not an integer so its not a multiple of anything its nothing

Alan Broussard - 5 years, 7 months ago

@Hany Kadous 0 = 0 * 3 is a true statement.

You are not allowed to divide by 0. So saying 3 = 0 / 0 is not a valid conclusion.

Calvin Lin Staff - 5 years, 7 months ago

@Hany Kadous Any number divisible by the multiplyer to generate a whole number is a multiplier of said integer.

I.e. 25/5=5 20/5=4 15/5=3 10/5=2 5/5=1 0/5=0 -5/5=-1 ....

David Colbeth - 5 years, 7 months ago

The three digits are not same ie A is not B is not C, in 222 a=b=c

Arvind Gore - 5 years, 7 months ago

I considered exactly this case. Take the number 101, for example. The result will be the same!

Normando Mendonça - 5 years, 7 months ago

To be more general , it is a multiple of 99 99 .

Nihar Mahajan - 5 years, 8 months ago

Log in to reply

Good observation! Why?

Calvin Lin Staff - 5 years, 8 months ago

Log in to reply

Modified the above solution:

A B C C B A = ( 100 A + 10 B + C ) ( 100 C + 10 B + A ) \overline{ABC} - \overline{CBA} = (100A + 10B + C) - (100C + 10B + A)

  1. The above equation simplifies down to:

99 A 99 C = 99 ( A C ) 99A - 99C = 99(A - C)

  1. Since a 99 99 can be extracted from the equation and both A A and C C are integers, the number produced is a multiple of 99 99 .

Nihar Mahajan - 5 years, 8 months ago

It would be a little tricky if asked of11's multiple

Shyambhu Mukherjee - 5 years, 8 months ago

Excellent!!

Rodrigo Angelo Ferreira Castellã - 5 years, 8 months ago

In fact zero is a multiple of everynumber, integral or not, except zero itself.

Robert Lucas - 5 years, 8 months ago

actually if you subtract 777 from 777 it equals 0; a number that is not divisible by three

Brodie Daniels - 5 years, 7 months ago
Pranshu Gaba
Oct 13, 2015

A B C C B A ( m o d 3 ) \overline{ ABC } \equiv \overline{ CBA } \pmod{ 3 }

A B C C B A 0 ( m o d 3 ) \therefore \quad \overline{ ABC } - \overline{ CBA } \equiv \boxed{ 0 } \pmod{ 3 } ~~ _\square


Edit: I am adding the proof that A B C C B A ( m o d 3 ) \overline{ ABC } \equiv \overline{ CBA } \pmod{ 3 }

Let d r ( n ) dr ( n ) denote the digital root of n n . Since d r ( A B C ) = d r ( C B A ) dr(\overline{ ABC } ) = dr( \overline{ CBA } ) ,

A B C C B A ( m o d 9 ) . \overline{ ABC } \equiv \overline{ CBA } \pmod{ 9 }.

Since 3 9 3 \mid 9 , the following congruence is also true.

A B C C B A ( m o d 3 ) \overline{ ABC } \equiv \overline{ CBA } \pmod{ 3 } ~~~~ _\square

You have to justify why ABC \equiv CBA is true

Agnishom Chattopadhyay - 5 years, 8 months ago

Log in to reply

Or a better way to put it is:

A B C k ( m o d 3 ) C B A k ( m o d 3 ) A B C C B A 0 ( m o d 3 ) \overline{ABC} \equiv k \pmod{3} \\ \overline{CBA} \equiv k \pmod{3}\\ \Rightarrow \overline{ABC} - \overline{CBA} \equiv 0 \pmod{3}

Nihar Mahajan - 5 years, 8 months ago

Log in to reply

That still doesn't explain why they are equal.

Yes, it is a fact that they are equal, and Agnishom's point is that we should explain why this fact is true.

Calvin Lin Staff - 5 years, 8 months ago

Log in to reply

@Calvin Lin Note that A B C = 100 A + 10 B + C A + B + C ( m o d 3 ) \overline{ABC}=100A+10B+C\equiv A+B+C\pmod{3}

Similaly C B A A + B + C ( m o d 3 ) \overline{CBA}\equiv A+B+C\pmod{3} Hence the result.

Daniel Liu - 5 years, 8 months ago

I wanted to write a solution without words and I felt that ABC ≡ CBA is a trivial fact. Nevertheless, I have added a justification to the solution.

Pranshu Gaba - 5 years, 8 months ago

Haha , Easiest solution :P

Nihar Mahajan - 5 years, 8 months ago
Gary Aknin
Oct 14, 2015

True. 100a + 10b + c - 100c - 10b - a = 100a - a - 100c + c 99a - 99c = 3(33) (a-c). There divisible by 3.

Sadasiva Panicker
Oct 14, 2015

521-125 =396; 814 -418 = 396; abc -cba = 100a +10b + c - 100c + 10b + a = 99a = 99c = 99(a - c) is a multiple of 3

Joe Ohayon
Oct 30, 2015

Any number subtracted fom it's reverse is a multiple of 3

Bran Nabor
Oct 28, 2015

Let a be the three digit number. Then a can be expressed as: 100x+10y+z

It's reverse is 100z+10y+x.

Getting the difference:

100x-100z+10y-10y + (z-x)

= 99x-99z = 99(x-z) =3(33(x-z))

David Acero
Oct 27, 2015

If you sum any 3 numbers and the result is multiple of 3,the numbers were also multiple of 3.

1+1+1=3 and 1 is not a multiple of 3

Julian Yu - 5 years, 7 months ago

Very easy kkkkk

Amit Gupta
Oct 25, 2015

from above question we can take any 3 digit no like 567 nd proceed.we can take other number too. reverse of 567 is 765 nd we have to subtract 567 from it so..... 765

567

198 we have 198 which is multyple of 3.

Rajesh Roj
Oct 25, 2015

<XYZ>=100X+10Y+Z <ZYX>=100Z+10Y+X <XYZ>-<ZYX>=99X-99Z=3(33X-33Z)

Philip Zook
Oct 18, 2015

Find the digital sum of ABC - CBA. Divide the digital sum by 3. If you get an integer result, it is true.

Alexander Jansing
Oct 18, 2015

There is a problem in number theory that was introduced to me that was about bank tellers flipping and two numbers in an n-length value and the difference with be divisible by 9.

Sirajudheen Mp
Oct 18, 2015

Let abc be the theree digit number cba is its revers (abc-cba)=(100a+10b+c-100c-10b-a)=99a-99c=3(33a-33c)

Subtracting any whole number from its reverse gives a multiple of 3. If the number has an odd number of digits the resulting number is divisible by 99 and if it has an even number of digits it is divisible by 9.

xyz -zyx = 99x -0y -99z = 3(33x -0y -33z).

Leo Halliwell
Oct 17, 2015

I just went to my calculator and started punching in numbers and dividing by 3. Even works if it comes out to a negative integer.

0 pending reports

×

Problem Loading...

Note Loading...

Set Loading...