True or False?
Subtracting any 3 digit number from its reverse gives a multiple of 3.
Example: 7 2 5 − 5 2 7 = 1 9 8 = 6 6 ⋅ 3 .
Note: 0 is a multiple of 3 since 0 ⋅ 3 = 0
This section requires Javascript.
You are seeing this because something didn't load right. We suggest you, (a) try
refreshing the page, (b) enabling javascript if it is disabled on your browser and,
finally, (c)
loading the
non-javascript version of this page
. We're sorry about the hassle.
but cant you substract 222 from 222? and 0 its not a multiple of 3?..
Log in to reply
Note that 0 is a multiple of 3, since 0 = 0 × 3 .
In fact, 0 is a multiple of every number.
What you are thinking of, is likely that "0 is not a factor of 3", which is a true statement. This is because there is no value N such that 3 = 0 × N .
Log in to reply
If : 0=0 * 3 then 3 = 0/0 this uknown quantity So 0 is not multiple of any number
Log in to reply
@Hany Kadous – 0/0 is undefined because it exists for all numbers; therefore, it is a multiple of all numbers.
@Hany Kadous – Sure 0/0 = x
x can be anything. That is why division by zero is "not allowed". Any answer is valid for x/0. x/0 = i for instance. but it can also be 4, e, π, φ, 7/π + √2i, all answers are valid.
@Hany Kadous – also 0 is an expression not an integer so its not a multiple of anything its nothing
@Hany Kadous – 0 = 0 * 3 is a true statement.
You are not allowed to divide by 0. So saying 3 = 0 / 0 is not a valid conclusion.
@Hany Kadous – Any number divisible by the multiplyer to generate a whole number is a multiplier of said integer.
I.e. 25/5=5 20/5=4 15/5=3 10/5=2 5/5=1 0/5=0 -5/5=-1 ....
The three digits are not same ie A is not B is not C, in 222 a=b=c
I considered exactly this case. Take the number 101, for example. The result will be the same!
To be more general , it is a multiple of 9 9 .
Log in to reply
Good observation! Why?
Log in to reply
Modified the above solution:
A B C − C B A = ( 1 0 0 A + 1 0 B + C ) − ( 1 0 0 C + 1 0 B + A )
9 9 A − 9 9 C = 9 9 ( A − C )
It would be a little tricky if asked of11's multiple
Excellent!!
In fact zero is a multiple of everynumber, integral or not, except zero itself.
actually if you subtract 777 from 777 it equals 0; a number that is not divisible by three
A B C ≡ C B A ( m o d 3 )
∴ A B C − C B A ≡ 0 ( m o d 3 ) □
Edit: I am adding the proof that A B C ≡ C B A ( m o d 3 )
Let d r ( n ) denote the digital root of n . Since d r ( A B C ) = d r ( C B A ) ,
A B C ≡ C B A ( m o d 9 ) .
Since 3 ∣ 9 , the following congruence is also true.
A B C ≡ C B A ( m o d 3 ) □
You have to justify why ABC \equiv CBA is true
Log in to reply
Or a better way to put it is:
A B C ≡ k ( m o d 3 ) C B A ≡ k ( m o d 3 ) ⇒ A B C − C B A ≡ 0 ( m o d 3 )
Log in to reply
That still doesn't explain why they are equal.
Yes, it is a fact that they are equal, and Agnishom's point is that we should explain why this fact is true.
Log in to reply
@Calvin Lin – Note that A B C = 1 0 0 A + 1 0 B + C ≡ A + B + C ( m o d 3 )
Similaly C B A ≡ A + B + C ( m o d 3 ) Hence the result.
I wanted to write a solution without words and I felt that ABC ≡ CBA is a trivial fact. Nevertheless, I have added a justification to the solution.
Haha , Easiest solution :P
True. 100a + 10b + c - 100c - 10b - a = 100a - a - 100c + c 99a - 99c = 3(33) (a-c). There divisible by 3.
521-125 =396; 814 -418 = 396; abc -cba = 100a +10b + c - 100c + 10b + a = 99a = 99c = 99(a - c) is a multiple of 3
Any number subtracted fom it's reverse is a multiple of 3
Let a be the three digit number. Then a can be expressed as: 100x+10y+z
It's reverse is 100z+10y+x.
Getting the difference:
100x-100z+10y-10y + (z-x)
= 99x-99z = 99(x-z) =3(33(x-z))
If you sum any 3 numbers and the result is multiple of 3,the numbers were also multiple of 3.
1+1+1=3 and 1 is not a multiple of 3
from above question we can take any 3 digit no like 567 nd proceed.we can take other number too. reverse of 567 is 765 nd we have to subtract 567 from it so..... 765
198 we have 198 which is multyple of 3.
<XYZ>=100X+10Y+Z <ZYX>=100Z+10Y+X <XYZ>-<ZYX>=99X-99Z=3(33X-33Z)
Find the digital sum of ABC - CBA. Divide the digital sum by 3. If you get an integer result, it is true.
There is a problem in number theory that was introduced to me that was about bank tellers flipping and two numbers in an n-length value and the difference with be divisible by 9.
Let abc be the theree digit number cba is its revers (abc-cba)=(100a+10b+c-100c-10b-a)=99a-99c=3(33a-33c)
Subtracting any whole number from its reverse gives a multiple of 3. If the number has an odd number of digits the resulting number is divisible by 99 and if it has an even number of digits it is divisible by 9.
xyz -zyx = 99x -0y -99z = 3(33x -0y -33z).
I just went to my calculator and started punching in numbers and dividing by 3. Even works if it comes out to a negative integer.
Problem Loading...
Note Loading...
Set Loading...
Let A B C = 1 0 0 A + 1 0 B + C
A B C − C B A = ( 1 0 0 A + 1 0 B + C ) − ( 1 0 0 C + 1 0 B + A )
The above equation simplifies down to:
9 9 A − 9 9 C = 3 ( 3 3 A − 3 3 C )
Since a 3 can be extracted from the equation and both A and C are integers, the number produced is a multiple of 3 .
Note: Since 0 = 0 ⋅ 3 , 0 is a multiple of 3 . In fact, 0 is a multiple of any integer.