This is Just Perfect

6 , 28 , 496 , ? \LARGE \color{#3D99F6}6, \color{#20A900}{28}, \color{#D61F06}{496}, \color{#624F41}?

Find the pattern to the numbers above, and determine the number to the sequence.

8128 100121 3625 121144

This section requires Javascript.
You are seeing this because something didn't load right. We suggest you, (a) try refreshing the page, (b) enabling javascript if it is disabled on your browser and, finally, (c) loading the non-javascript version of this page . We're sorry about the hassle.

19 solutions

Eamon Gupta
Mar 14, 2015

They are the list of perfect numbers - the numbers whose factors (except itself) add to itself. The factors of 6 are 1, 2 and 3: 1 + 2 + 3 = 6 1 + 2 + 3 = 6 The next perfect number is 8128.

Getting to learn something from this answer...

Tirthatilak Pani - 6 years, 3 months ago

Log in to reply

f(n) = 223 n^2 - 647 n + 430 ....... (this is the pattern)

f(1) = 6

f(2) = 28

f(3) = 496

f(4) = 1410

Gamal Sultan - 6 years, 2 months ago

Log in to reply

There is no pattern for perfect numbers
http://www.mersenne.org/primes/ http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List of perfect_numbers According to Great Internet Mersenne Prime Search ,there are 48 known perfect numbers.

Ahmed Kamal - 6 years, 2 months ago

When is everyone gonna learn about Lagrange Interpolation Formula ¨ \ddot \frown

Kishlaya Jaiswal - 6 years, 2 months ago

I found this pattern

2 ( 2 n ) ( 2 ( 1 + 2 n ) 1 ) 2^{\left(2^{n}\right)} \cdot \left( 2^{\left(1+ 2^n \right)} -1 \right)

for n = 0 , 1 , 2 n = 0, 1, 2

Andrea Palma - 6 years, 1 month ago

f(n) = 223 n^2 - 647 n + 430 ....... (this is the pattern)

f(1) = 6

f(2) = 28

f(3) = 496

f(4) = 1410

Gamal Sultan - 6 years, 2 months ago

All the solutions mentioned here are totally garbage, and they should not be read. Wastage of time!

Vishal Kumar - 6 years, 2 months ago

Log in to reply

Sir , why do you think so .

A Former Brilliant Member - 6 years, 2 months ago

Log in to reply

No, I think that yes, all solutions are very nice. But I wish that if the problem writer knew about Lagrange Interpolation Formula.

Kishlaya Jaiswal - 6 years, 2 months ago

Log in to reply

@Kishlaya Jaiswal What is the Lagrange Interpolation Formula ??

A Former Brilliant Member - 6 years, 2 months ago

Log in to reply

@A Former Brilliant Member You can read about it here

Kishlaya Jaiswal - 6 years, 2 months ago

Log in to reply

@Kishlaya Jaiswal Thanks . It was useful .

A Former Brilliant Member - 6 years, 2 months ago

Log in to reply

@A Former Brilliant Member It was all my pleasure. ¨ \ddot \smile

Kishlaya Jaiswal - 6 years, 2 months ago

This is mostly a pattern finding question;

During the sequence the units go up each time for example

6 ----> 28 ----> 496 ----> ????:

So:

Units ---> Tenths ----> Hundreds ------> Thousands

So we know that the next number has to be in the thousands but there are two possible answers, so which one is it?

Well if you look closely you'll see a pattern in the number itself for example it goes 6, 28 then 496 noticed that the number 6 repeated itself making it so that the ending of the next number will be an 8 if it continues to follow the sequence and 8128 would be this number that satisfies it.

Exactly my method. I find that the simplest explanation is often the best.

Kaitlin Smith - 6 years, 2 months ago

f(n) = 223 n^2 - 647 n + 430 ....... (this is the pattern)

f(1) = 6

f(2) = 28

f(3) = 496

f(4) = 1410

Gamal Sultan - 6 years, 2 months ago

Log in to reply

Gamal, that is a polynomial approximation to the pattern, it is not the pattern ( if it was, your answer would have been one of the choices)

Brett Hartley - 6 years, 2 months ago
Vaibhav Prasad
Mar 14, 2015

6 1 ( m o d 5 ) 28 3 ( m o d 5 ) 496 1 ( m o d 5 ) 6\equiv 1\quad (mod\quad 5)\\ 28\equiv 3\quad (mod\quad 5)\\ 496\equiv 1\quad (mod\quad 5)

We get the series 1 , 3 , 1 , 3 , 1 , 3 , 1 , 3... 1,3,1,3,1,3,1,3...

Thus the next number would be 3 ( m o d 5 ) \equiv 3\quad (mod\quad 5) and only 8128 satisfies this.

This is incorrect, I'm afraid: the perfect numbers do not always alternate modulo 5 5 's between 1 1 and 3. 3. After 8128 , 8128, the next two terms both end with 6. 6. OEIS entry

Caleb Townsend - 6 years, 3 months ago

Log in to reply

Ok then I guess I was lucky

Vaibhav Prasad - 6 years, 3 months ago

f(n) = 223 n^2 - 647 n + 430 ....... (this is the pattern)

f(1) = 6

f(2) = 28

f(3) = 496

f(4) = 1410

Gamal Sultan - 6 years, 2 months ago

Excellent solution

I have another solution

f(n) = 223 n^2 - 647 n + 430 ....... (this is the pattern)

f(1) = 6

f(2) = 28

f(3) = 496

f(4) = 1410

Gamal Sultan - 6 years, 2 months ago
Alberto Pachón
Mar 14, 2015

My solution is so basic (almost embarrassing)

6 -> 2^1 * 3

28 -> 2^2 * 7

496 -> 2^3* 62

there's only one number in the options multiple of 2^4

Done in same way man.....!

Tirthatilak Pani - 6 years, 3 months ago

Log in to reply

great minds work alike... LOL

Alberto Pachón - 6 years, 2 months ago

f(n) = 223 n^2 - 647 n + 430 ....... (this is the pattern)

f(1) = 6

f(2) = 28

f(3) = 496

f(4) = 1410

Gamal Sultan - 6 years, 2 months ago
Ali Zafar
Mar 17, 2015

well look

3=2^2-1

7=2^3-1

31=2^5-1

the given series 6=((2^2-1) 2 ), 28=(2^3-1) (2^2),496=(2^5-1)*(2^4) we can arrange it like this

(2^2-1) (2)=(3) (2)=6

(2^3-1) (2 ^2)=(7) (4)=28

(2^4-1) (2 ^3)=(15) (8)=120

(2^5-1) (2 ^4)=(31) (16)=498

(2^6-1) (2 ^5)=(63) (32)=2016

(2^7-1) (2 ^6)=(127) (64)=8128

actually i just hit the answer and i got a point

Brian Jiang
Mar 18, 2015

The theorem is that all even perfect numbers can be predicted using the following: (2^p - 1)(2^(p-1)) where p is any prime number.

Substituting primes: (2^2 -1)(2^(2-1)) = 6.
(2^3 -1)(2^(3-1))= 28. (2^5 -1)(2^(5-1))= 496 , finally, (2^7 -1)(2^(7-1)) = 8128.

I forgot which mathematician did this. I think it was Euler or Fermat.

Sandy Gunawan
Mar 17, 2015

Just see at the last digit of the number ^o^ 6, ...8, ...6, then 8 again

Caio Pompéia
Mar 16, 2015

I've seen a different solution... All terms follow this pattern :

G (n)=(2^n)*[2^(n+1)-1]

Only with the enunciated :

F (n)=G (2^(n-1))=2^[2^(n-1)]*{2^[2^(n-1)+1]-1}

F (1)=2^1 (2^2-1)=2 3=6

F (2)=2^2 (2^3-1)=4 7=28

F (3)=2^4 (2^5-1)=16 31=496

f(n) = 223 n^2 - 647 n + 430 ....... (this is the pattern)

f(1) = 6

f(2) = 28

f(3) = 496

f(4) = 1410

Gamal Sultan - 6 years, 2 months ago
Abdullah Warriach
Mar 16, 2015

It was really easy I guess

I got it wrong because I found the pattern perfectly but the answer wasn't in the options... See.. 6 is 2(2(2)-1), 28 is 4(4(2)-1), 496 is 16(16(2)-1) and so on... Please see that first we had 2, then 4, then 16, so the next serie will be 256 and then 256(256(2)-1) = 130816... I don't like the explanations of the sequence ending in 6 then 8 then 6 an then 8... I think those guys just guessed

Victor Trejo Athie - 6 years, 2 months ago

Log in to reply

Nice one, it should be 2^6 = 64. 64(64(2)-1) = 8128

AccelNano Lim Loong - 6 years, 2 months ago

f(n) = 223 n^2 - 647 n + 430 ....... (this is the pattern)

f(1) = 6

f(2) = 28

f(3) = 496

f(4) = 1410

Gamal Sultan - 6 years, 2 months ago
Vikram Venkat
Mar 16, 2015

Others: big solution with logic

Me: ends in 6, ends in 28, ends in 7, ends in 28!!

Pushan Paul
Jun 2, 2016

The one's place is always going in a pattern of 6,8,6 then only the number 8128 has in the one's place 8

Vipul Vaibhav
Mar 29, 2015

For me it was like just reading the unit digits. First 6 then 8, then 6 so it follows the next should end with 8. and since there was just one option ending with 8 so Voila!

Kaitlin Smith
Mar 24, 2015

Honestly, I just guessed. I saw that the numbers were increasing in the number of digits (1 digit, 2 digits, 3 digits) and concluded that the next number would have four digits. This brought my answer choices down to two. Then, I saw that the one's place went from 6 to 8 and back to 6 and guessed that the next number would end in 8. This led me to choose the correct answer. Though it is really cool reading about the perfect numbers, etc.

Niels Versavel
Mar 22, 2015

They are all numbers which are the product of a certain n-power of 2 and another number which is 1 less than twice the first number.

In other words, 2 n 2^{n} ( 2 × 2 n 2 \times 2^{n} - 1)

6=2*3

28=4*7

496=16*31

Although I'm not sure why 8*15 is not in this sequence.

Arun Sundaram
Mar 21, 2015

Its a type of number sequence. Its called Perfect Numbers. The question itself says "This is Just Perfect".

The first perfect number is 6, because 1, 2, and 3 are its proper positive divisors, and 1 + 2 + 3 = 6. Equivalently, the number 6 is equal to half the sum of all its positive divisors: ( 1 + 2 + 3 + 6 ) / 2 = 6.

The next perfect number is 28 = 1 + 2 + 4 + 7 + 14.

This is followed by the perfect numbers 496 and 8128.

source: wikipedia.

Jaswanth Prasadam
Mar 20, 2015

((2^n)-1)(2^n-1) where n is prime number n=2,3,5,7........... .

Jeff Miller
Mar 18, 2015

It was a guess...it needed to be even and to jump to a 6 figure number seemed excessive

Leonardo Sipayung
Mar 17, 2015

I think, because the first number is 6 and the next number ending in 8, the third number ending in 6 again. so the next number ending in 8 ... heheheh: D

0 pending reports

×

Problem Loading...

Note Loading...

Set Loading...