6 , 2 8 , 4 9 6 , ?
Find the pattern to the numbers above, and determine the number to the sequence.
This section requires Javascript.
You are seeing this because something didn't load right. We suggest you, (a) try
refreshing the page, (b) enabling javascript if it is disabled on your browser and,
finally, (c)
loading the
non-javascript version of this page
. We're sorry about the hassle.
Getting to learn something from this answer...
Log in to reply
f(n) = 223 n^2 - 647 n + 430 ....... (this is the pattern)
f(1) = 6
f(2) = 28
f(3) = 496
f(4) = 1410
Log in to reply
There is no pattern for perfect numbers
http://www.mersenne.org/primes/
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List
of
perfect_numbers
According to Great Internet Mersenne Prime Search ,there are 48 known perfect numbers.
When is everyone gonna learn about Lagrange Interpolation Formula ⌢ ¨
I found this pattern
2 ( 2 n ) ⋅ ( 2 ( 1 + 2 n ) − 1 )
for n = 0 , 1 , 2
f(n) = 223 n^2 - 647 n + 430 ....... (this is the pattern)
f(1) = 6
f(2) = 28
f(3) = 496
f(4) = 1410
All the solutions mentioned here are totally garbage, and they should not be read. Wastage of time!
Log in to reply
Sir , why do you think so .
Log in to reply
No, I think that yes, all solutions are very nice. But I wish that if the problem writer knew about Lagrange Interpolation Formula.
Log in to reply
@Kishlaya Jaiswal – What is the Lagrange Interpolation Formula ??
Log in to reply
@A Former Brilliant Member – You can read about it here
Log in to reply
@Kishlaya Jaiswal – Thanks . It was useful .
Log in to reply
@A Former Brilliant Member – It was all my pleasure. ⌣ ¨
This is mostly a pattern finding question;
During the sequence the units go up each time for example
6 ----> 28 ----> 496 ----> ????:
So:
Units ---> Tenths ----> Hundreds ------> Thousands
So we know that the next number has to be in the thousands but there are two possible answers, so which one is it?
Well if you look closely you'll see a pattern in the number itself for example it goes 6, 28 then 496 noticed that the number 6 repeated itself making it so that the ending of the next number will be an 8 if it continues to follow the sequence and 8128 would be this number that satisfies it.
Exactly my method. I find that the simplest explanation is often the best.
f(n) = 223 n^2 - 647 n + 430 ....... (this is the pattern)
f(1) = 6
f(2) = 28
f(3) = 496
f(4) = 1410
Log in to reply
Gamal, that is a polynomial approximation to the pattern, it is not the pattern ( if it was, your answer would have been one of the choices)
6 ≡ 1 ( m o d 5 ) 2 8 ≡ 3 ( m o d 5 ) 4 9 6 ≡ 1 ( m o d 5 )
We get the series 1 , 3 , 1 , 3 , 1 , 3 , 1 , 3 . . .
Thus the next number would be ≡ 3 ( m o d 5 ) and only 8128 satisfies this.
This is incorrect, I'm afraid: the perfect numbers do not always alternate modulo 5 's between 1 and 3 . After 8 1 2 8 , the next two terms both end with 6 . OEIS entry
Log in to reply
Ok then I guess I was lucky
f(n) = 223 n^2 - 647 n + 430 ....... (this is the pattern)
f(1) = 6
f(2) = 28
f(3) = 496
f(4) = 1410
Excellent solution
I have another solution
f(n) = 223 n^2 - 647 n + 430 ....... (this is the pattern)
f(1) = 6
f(2) = 28
f(3) = 496
f(4) = 1410
My solution is so basic (almost embarrassing)
6 -> 2^1 * 3
28 -> 2^2 * 7
496 -> 2^3* 62
there's only one number in the options multiple of 2^4
Done in same way man.....!
f(n) = 223 n^2 - 647 n + 430 ....... (this is the pattern)
f(1) = 6
f(2) = 28
f(3) = 496
f(4) = 1410
well look
3=2^2-1
7=2^3-1
31=2^5-1
the given series 6=((2^2-1) 2 ), 28=(2^3-1) (2^2),496=(2^5-1)*(2^4) we can arrange it like this
(2^2-1) (2)=(3) (2)=6
(2^3-1) (2 ^2)=(7) (4)=28
(2^4-1) (2 ^3)=(15) (8)=120
(2^5-1) (2 ^4)=(31) (16)=498
(2^6-1) (2 ^5)=(63) (32)=2016
(2^7-1) (2 ^6)=(127) (64)=8128
actually i just hit the answer and i got a point
The theorem is that all even perfect numbers can be predicted using the following: (2^p - 1)(2^(p-1)) where p is any prime number.
Substituting primes:
(2^2 -1)(2^(2-1)) = 6.
(2^3 -1)(2^(3-1))= 28.
(2^5 -1)(2^(5-1))= 496 , finally, (2^7 -1)(2^(7-1)) = 8128.
I forgot which mathematician did this. I think it was Euler or Fermat.
Just see at the last digit of the number ^o^ 6, ...8, ...6, then 8 again
I've seen a different solution... All terms follow this pattern :
G (n)=(2^n)*[2^(n+1)-1]
Only with the enunciated :
F (n)=G (2^(n-1))=2^[2^(n-1)]*{2^[2^(n-1)+1]-1}
F (1)=2^1 (2^2-1)=2 3=6
F (2)=2^2 (2^3-1)=4 7=28
F (3)=2^4 (2^5-1)=16 31=496
f(n) = 223 n^2 - 647 n + 430 ....... (this is the pattern)
f(1) = 6
f(2) = 28
f(3) = 496
f(4) = 1410
It was really easy I guess
I got it wrong because I found the pattern perfectly but the answer wasn't in the options... See.. 6 is 2(2(2)-1), 28 is 4(4(2)-1), 496 is 16(16(2)-1) and so on... Please see that first we had 2, then 4, then 16, so the next serie will be 256 and then 256(256(2)-1) = 130816... I don't like the explanations of the sequence ending in 6 then 8 then 6 an then 8... I think those guys just guessed
Log in to reply
Nice one, it should be 2^6 = 64. 64(64(2)-1) = 8128
f(n) = 223 n^2 - 647 n + 430 ....... (this is the pattern)
f(1) = 6
f(2) = 28
f(3) = 496
f(4) = 1410
Others: big solution with logic
Me: ends in 6, ends in 28, ends in 7, ends in 28!!
The one's place is always going in a pattern of 6,8,6 then only the number 8128 has in the one's place 8
For me it was like just reading the unit digits. First 6 then 8, then 6 so it follows the next should end with 8. and since there was just one option ending with 8 so Voila!
Honestly, I just guessed. I saw that the numbers were increasing in the number of digits (1 digit, 2 digits, 3 digits) and concluded that the next number would have four digits. This brought my answer choices down to two. Then, I saw that the one's place went from 6 to 8 and back to 6 and guessed that the next number would end in 8. This led me to choose the correct answer. Though it is really cool reading about the perfect numbers, etc.
They are all numbers which are the product of a certain n-power of 2 and another number which is 1 less than twice the first number.
In other words, 2 n ( 2 × 2 n - 1)
6=2*3
28=4*7
496=16*31
Although I'm not sure why 8*15 is not in this sequence.
Its a type of number sequence. Its called Perfect Numbers. The question itself says "This is Just Perfect".
The first perfect number is 6, because 1, 2, and 3 are its proper positive divisors, and 1 + 2 + 3 = 6. Equivalently, the number 6 is equal to half the sum of all its positive divisors: ( 1 + 2 + 3 + 6 ) / 2 = 6.
The next perfect number is 28 = 1 + 2 + 4 + 7 + 14.
This is followed by the perfect numbers 496 and 8128.
source: wikipedia.
((2^n)-1)(2^n-1) where n is prime number n=2,3,5,7...........
.
It was a guess...it needed to be even and to jump to a 6 figure number seemed excessive
I think, because the first number is 6 and the next number ending in 8, the third number ending in 6 again. so the next number ending in 8 ... heheheh: D
Problem Loading...
Note Loading...
Set Loading...
They are the list of perfect numbers - the numbers whose factors (except itself) add to itself. The factors of 6 are 1, 2 and 3: 1 + 2 + 3 = 6 The next perfect number is 8128.