Space Bound

Find the number of perfect squares a a b c d \overline{ aabcd } with a 0 a\neq 0 and d 0 d\neq 0 such that the number d c b a a \overline { dcbaa } is also a perfect square.

2 4 1 3 0

This section requires Javascript.
You are seeing this because something didn't load right. We suggest you, (a) try refreshing the page, (b) enabling javascript if it is disabled on your browser and, finally, (c) loading the non-javascript version of this page . We're sorry about the hassle.

1 solution

Lu Chee Ket
Oct 23, 2015

Such 5 digits of [non-zero] only valid from 100^2 to 316^2 OR 10000 to 99856:

44521 <--> 12544 {from 112^2 and 211^2}

44944 <--> 44944 {from 212^2}

no others

Since a, c and d are not restricted from being equal, 1 is not likely the answer wanted, 2 is the answer.

we accept from 100 to 316, let (m 100+n 10+p)^2=dbcaa,,,, n[0->9], m[1->3], p[1-9]

then 10000m^2+100n^2+p^2+2000mn+200mp+20np=dbcaa

let consider only p^2+20np that determine aa or a*10+a

if p=1, a=1, but 20np always even then cannot be 1

p=2, a=4, we find that n must be 1 or 6 so that aa can be 44

p=3, just like p=1 not eligible

p=4, a=6, p^2 =16 then the 10*a (the ten place) will be odd (20np + 10 (from p^2))

p=5,6,7,9 also not.

p=8 eligible that a also =4, 160n+64 then n can be 3 or 8

then it should be 44bcd and dcb44

and we know that (m 100+n 10+p)^2=dbc44

Now the work more easily with m from 1 to 3, n can be 1, 6 for p=2, n can be 3 or 8 for p=8.

Just subs those value to find dbc44, then reverse it and square root it for finding the right answers.

HIEU TRAN - 5 years, 7 months ago

Log in to reply

A much simpler way is to show that a perfect square mod 4 = 0, 1 only. So a = 4 , 7 , 8 a = 4,7,8 only. But because no values of x 2 x^2 ends in 7 7 or 8 8 for integer x x , then a = 7 a = 7 and a = 8 a=8 can't be a solution. Then a = 4 a = 4 only. Can you take it from here?

Pi Han Goh - 5 years, 7 months ago

Log in to reply

One (very slight) omission: you didn't explain the elimination of a=3. Otherwise, I completely agree with your way of doing it.

Peter Byers - 5 years, 7 months ago

Log in to reply

@Peter Byers Oh right thanks! I wasn't looking when I was typing. haha

Pi Han Goh - 5 years, 7 months ago

0 pending reports

×

Problem Loading...

Note Loading...

Set Loading...