A carpet is rolled into the form of a cylinder (by rolling it along the length) of radius 1 4 0 2 7 m and it is kept on a rough horizontal floor. The carpet is given a negligible (gentle) push and it starts to unroll without slipping. Calculate the horizontal velocity in m / s of the axis of the cylindrical part of the carpet when its radius becomes 2 8 0 2 7 .
Note: Approximate g to be 1 0 m / s 2 .
This section requires Javascript.
You are seeing this because something didn't load right. We suggest you, (a) try
refreshing the page, (b) enabling javascript if it is disabled on your browser and,
finally, (c)
loading the
non-javascript version of this page
. We're sorry about the hassle.
Nice solution! I didn't understand one thing, though...why don't we consider the work done by friction while applying the work energy theorem? Isn't the friction the only force that applies a net torque to rotate the cylindrical carpet left over? So don't we need to consider the work it does?
It is really necessary to know that the friction acting here is the Rolling Friction . It does not do any work. Please check out wikipedia or something for the proof.
A perfect example of this is a situation of a rolling cylinder.
Consider a cylinder which is rolling on a
rough
surface. It is well known that the cylinder does
not
stop..... (only if it is pure rolling).
Thus, the work done by the rolling friction is zero (as there is no change in the Kinetic Energy of the cylinder).
It's pretty simple to prove. During the process of pure rolling, the point of contact between the object and the surface has no velocity, i.e it is not moving, which means it's displacement is 0. Now friction acts on the body through this point of contact and as the point of contact has no displacement, the work done by friction is 0. (the point of contact keeps changing, btw)
@Mandar Sohoni – Yes. But that paragraph you wrote would be too much to add into the content that I had already written.
@Anish Puthuraya – fair enough
Ruchir Mehta you have written that find the horizontal component of velocity in "m/s^2".Velocity is in m/s.
Thats ok man. It is clear that velocity has been asked, so whats the big deal.
Maybe the challenge masters would rectify it. Anyway, as Anish Puthuraya mentioned: "whats the big deal".
I loved this problem! So exciting!! Ok, let's go :). Oh, wait- first, a few comments to Ruchir Mehta: thanks for such a cool problem. Also, little typo- you ask for the horizontal velocity in m/s^2, so you should probably fix that. Ok, now on to my solution.
This problem just screams conservation of energy, doesn't it :)? All you need to look at are the beginning and ending situations. At the beginning, we have a rolled up carpet with a decent amount of gravitational potential energy. Afterwards, however, our carpet has very little gravitational potential energy in comparison. It must make up for this loss with some (linear and rotational) kinetic energy. So, we just apply conservation of energy and solve :). One thing, though- for me it was troublesome to calculate the potential energy of the cylinder before and after. The answer is very intuitive, but I actually did some integration using densities and differential angles and pesky little things like that. That's not really necessary to do on here (you can try it if you want); we'll just do a hand-wavy proof for the potential energy of the cylinder: the potential energy of a point at the bottom of the cylinder is zero. At the top it's 2MgR. We take the average for the whole cylinder, and get that for a general cylinder of uniform density (cylinder must be small enough so g is pretty much constant), the potential energy is MgR.
For the cylinder at the beginning: r 1 = R and m 1 = M . For the cylinder at the end: r 1 = R / 2 (given). And m 2 ? Well, we can find it like this: the density of the cylinder remains constant, so its mass at the beginning can be written as p L π r 1 2 = p L π R 2 where p is density and L is length. At the end, it can be written like p L π r 2 2 = p L π R 2 / 4 . So m 2 is a quarter of m 1 .
m 2 = M / 4 . Thus, the potential energy at the beginning U 1 is equal to M g R while at the end U 2 = M g R / 8 . The beginning potential energy is the total energy of the cylinder. At the end, it has potential, rotational kinetic, and linear kinetic. The final energy is equal to the initial, of course:
U 1 = U 2 + K R + K L
M g R = M g R / 8 + 1 / 2 I ω 2 + 1 / 2 m 2 V 2
7 M g R / 8 = 1 / 2 ∗ 1 / 2 ∗ m 2 ∗ r 2 2 ω 2 + 1 / 2 m 2 V 2
7 M g R / 4 = 1 / 2 ∗ m 2 ∗ r 2 2 ω 2 + m 2 V 2
7 M g R / 4 = 1 / 2 ∗ m 2 ∗ r 2 2 ( V / r 2 ) 2 + m 2 V 2 = 1 / 8 ∗ M ∗ V 2 + 1 / 4 ∗ M ∗ V 2
V = 3 M / 8 7 M g R / 4
V = 3 1 4 g R
Plugging in the beautiful numbers given by Ruchir, we find that V=3m/s.
I am happy to see that you enjoyed this problem. I will try to keep sharing such problems on Brilliant.
Whoops, little mistake at the "cylinder potential energy" bit. I said that the potential energy of a point at the top is 2MgR, but I meant 2gRdm.
Just an observation : Could the idea of volume being related to area and area being related to length provide a link between pi and other mathematical constants such as e , phi (of course i , the square root of -1 is ever present) ? (especially in the context of involutes and evolutes of curves, logarthmic spirals that connect both e and phi) etc
Also, the vertical coordinate of any point seems to be reminiscent of damped oscillatory motion
Problem Loading...
Note Loading...
Set Loading...
This problem is easily solved using Conservation of Energy.
E i n i t = E f i n a l
When the Carpet is in the state where its radius is halved, it can be easily proven that the mass of the remaining rolled part of the cylinder is 4 M .
Thus,
Using P E i + K E i + R E i = P E f + K E f + R E f , we get,
M g R + 0 + 0 = ( 4 M ) g ( 2 R ) + 2 1 ( 4 M ) v c m 2 + 2 1 I c m w 2
Also, note that,
I c m = 2 ( 4 M ) ( 2 R ) 2 , and,
w = ( 2 R v c m ) 2
Therefore,
M g R = 8 M g R + 8 M v c m 2 + 1 6 M v c m 2
⇒ v c m = 3 1 4 g R = 9 = 3 m / s