⎩ ⎨ ⎧ tan α = 3 1 α = 6 β
Given the above, find 2 1 ( csc 2 β − 3 sec 2 β ) , if α is acute angle.
Answer up to 4 decimal places.
This section requires Javascript.
You are seeing this because something didn't load right. We suggest you, (a) try
refreshing the page, (b) enabling javascript if it is disabled on your browser and,
finally, (c)
loading the
non-javascript version of this page
. We're sorry about the hassle.
Great solution! I was quite near it but couldn't quite crack it :/
Log in to reply
Thanks.... @Abhay Kumar Easy and nice problem..... @Mehul Arora No problem...It just need to be worked in the right direction... :-) Next time maybe
Log in to reply
@Mehul Arora I ended up solving a cubic equation for tan 2 β , so you had better progress than me
Log in to reply
@Hung Woei Neoh – LOL, I introduced 1/2 to factorize it as 2 sin 4 Beta or something, and then substitute as 2/3 alpha, But it resulted in a bad looking expression. I didn't think of introducing 1 0 I don't remember though, I just clicked View Solution :P
Log in to reply
@Mehul Arora – I only clicked view solution twice. Both were accidents. With this type of questions, I will try my best to solve it, if I can't turn it into something neat, I'll just use my calculator :P
Typo: The third last line should be 1 0 [ sin 4 β sin ( α − 2 β ) ]
Anyway, wonderful solution! You have great trigo manipulation skills!
I am not able to understand what u did in the third step....
Log in to reply
1 0 1 cos 2 β − 1 0 3 sin 2 β
= sin α cos 2 β − cos α sin 2 β ( ∵ tan α = 3 1 ⟹ sin α = 1 0 1 , cos α = 1 0 3 )
= sin ( α − 2 β ) Use sin A cos B − cos A sin B = sin ( A − B )
got it!!! thanks bro...
Why to introduce √10??? If tan a=1/3 Can be directly sin a/ cos a= 1/3 i.e. sin a =1 and cos a= 3
Log in to reply
Noooo, Notice that cos a can never go above 1. i.e., cos ( α ) ≤ 1 . The introduction of 1 0 was only towards getting the Identity to simplify the expression
Very elegant solution. I had some weird cubic I eventually had to use a calculator for, which I hate doing. I have one question though: Why is 1 0 the correct number to use here? I have read the comments, I understand that introducing 1 0 makes for proper sin and cos values (very good idea by the way). But so does 1 7 or 3 1 . If I would have used either of those or some other number > 3 , the math here would lead to the answer being the number I introduced. So why is 1 0 the correct number to use?
Log in to reply
I just had a thought. If you look at this from the unit circle point of view, then opposite = 1 and adjacent = 3 , but that can't work with a hypotenuse of 1 . So if you say opposite = x 1 and adjacent = x 3 where x > 3 , then tan is still 3 1 and the triangle works. Then use Pythagorean Theorem and solve for x you get x = 1 0 . Is that where it came from?
Log in to reply
Exactly.... :-) .... I just thought using sin A cos B-cos A sin B =sin (A-B) can make it a bit simple and it did... :-)
Given tan(3x) = 1/3
We need to evaluate cosecx-3secx
Write 3 as cot(3x) and take LCM and open sin3x and cos3x by using standard results .
On bit simplification u will get as 2/sin3x
Problem Loading...
Note Loading...
Set Loading...
Relevant wiki: Sum and Difference Trigonometric Formulas - Problem Solving
Call the expression R . Use csc 2 β = sin 2 β 1 , sec 2 β = cos 2 β 1 and take LCM.
R = sin 4 β 2 sin 2 β cos 2 β cos 2 β − 3 sin 2 β
= 1 0 [ sin 4 β 1 0 1 cos 2 β − 1 0 3 sin 2 β ]
( tan α = 3 1 ⟹ sin α = 1 0 1 , cos α = 1 0 3 )
= 1 0 [ sin 4 β sin α cos 2 β − cos α sin 2 β ]
= 1 0 [ sin 4 β sin ( α − 2 β ) ] ( ∵ sin A cos B − cos A sin B = sin ( A − B ) )
= 1 0 [ sin 4 β sin 4 β ] ∵ α − 2 β = 4 β
= 1 0 ≈ 3 . 1 6 2 2