Analysis in Q \mathbb{Q}

Calculus Level 3

It is a well-known theorem that if f : R R f:\mathbb{R}\to\mathbb{R} is a differentiable function such that f ( t ) = 0 f'(t)=0 for all t R t\in\mathbb{R} , then f f is constant.

Is it true that if f : Q Q f:\mathbb{Q}\to\mathbb{Q} is a differentiable function such that f ( t ) = 0 f'(t)=0 for all t Q t\in\mathbb{Q} , then f f is constant?

Notations :

Yes No

This section requires Javascript.
You are seeing this because something didn't load right. We suggest you, (a) try refreshing the page, (b) enabling javascript if it is disabled on your browser and, finally, (c) loading the non-javascript version of this page . We're sorry about the hassle.

1 solution

Notice that the function g : Q Q \displaystyle g:\mathbb{Q}\to\mathbb{Q} defined as g ( t ) : = { 1 t 2 < 2 1 otherwise \displaystyle g(t):=\left\{\begin{matrix} -1 & t^2<2 \\ 1 & \text{otherwise} \end{matrix}\right. verify all the hypothesis of the theorem and however it's not constant.

Is it differientiable everywhere?

Stéphane Gasser - 4 years, 10 months ago

Log in to reply

Exactly. Such a function is not differentiable by the definition used in the link, because the derivative is not defined for all real numbers.

A Former Brilliant Member - 4 years, 10 months ago

After some discussion with the problem author, I realized finally that the example function is continuous and differentiable at every rational point. And it is only defined on the rational numbers. Interesting.

Steven Perkins - 4 years, 10 months ago

Nice counter example.

A Former Brilliant Member - 4 years, 10 months ago

Nice use of the Dirichlet function,

Sharky Kesa - 4 years, 10 months ago

Prove that your function is differentiable

Ravi Dwivedi - 4 years, 10 months ago

I don't quite get it. If the discontinuity points are rationals, (e.g x=|2|) the function is not continuous at x=2 (we can take two sequences taking values only on rational numbers, one coming from the left, one from the right), then How can it be differentiable in x=2? Or are we somehow talking about some "weak"differentiability?

Gerónimo Rojas Barragán - 4 years, 10 months ago

Log in to reply

I believe the discontinuity points are at +/- sqrt(2).

Steven Perkins - 4 years, 10 months ago

Log in to reply

Oh, you are right! Thank you

Gerónimo Rojas Barragán - 4 years, 10 months ago

Log in to reply

@Gerónimo Rojas Barragán As @Steven Perkins pointed out the points in which the function should be discontinuous are ± 2 \pm\sqrt{2} . But those points are not rationals numbers, so it doesn't make sense to ask if f f is not continuous there.

Victor Moreno Diaz - 4 years, 10 months ago

0 pending reports

×

Problem Loading...

Note Loading...

Set Loading...