In a triangle A B C ∠ A = 8 4 ∘ , ∠ C = 7 8 ∘ . Points D and E are taken on the sides A B and B C , so that ∠ A C D = 4 8 ∘ , ∠ C A E = 6 3 ∘ . What is the measure (in degrees) of ∠ C D E ?
This section requires Javascript.
You are seeing this because something didn't load right. We suggest you, (a) try
refreshing the page, (b) enabling javascript if it is disabled on your browser and,
finally, (c)
loading the
non-javascript version of this page
. We're sorry about the hassle.
it seems wrong assumption
According to the giving of the question, we have a fact that;
At triangle "CmA" and its angles are:
"ACm" = 48, "CAm" = 63 so Angel "CmA" = 69
Actually we can't consider or assume; AM to be perpendicular to DC
Log in to reply
Please, read carefully my solution. M isn't the intersection of CD and AE.
M is the midpoint of CD. Midpoint! MC = MA.
Log in to reply
How can we assume MC=MA and the angles ( ACM & CAM ) aren't equal
Log in to reply
@Kareem Nour – I didn't assume it. My M is midpoint of CD.
angle CAm can't be 63 degree
This is a right approach to the solution. Many get confused about his AD=1 assumption because they may not realize that we can assume AD as any value without changing the value of any of the angles. For example you can assume AD as a random value : x, then follow his approach replacing 1( his assumption for AD) with a. Then you will get to the same answer.
Good solution.. No mistake in solution, i found it correct.. but i suspect that more than one solution is possible for this question, as by angle chase there is only one linear equation is available having two variables. So i expect more than one solution.. although its a great work, i appreciate.
ur solution is true and easy to be understood @ Eloy Machado
i agree with Sid Leo. if we assume that CED=90 and AEC=39 then AED will be =51; and if AMC=69 then DME will also be =69; so CDE=(180-(51+69)) or CDE=60
Just find all the angles of every triangle and every quadrilateral. Triangles have a total of 180 degrees. Quadrilaterals have 360 degrees.
CDE= 48
Log in to reply
I too got the same ans
yes same to you
by angle chasing we get : m(ACD)=m(ADC)=48 , m(DCE)=30 SINCE in triangle ACD m(ACD)=m(ADC)=48 then triangle ACD is iscoceles triangle then AC=AD then AC and AD are two radius in circle A , AC and AD are two tangents sutend the same chord DC then m(ECD)=m(EDC)=30
Log in to reply
your right it is impossible for us to break that theory since we can't assume any principles that has no solid proof in that situation, i agree to your answer my answer is also 30, hence i am also looking forward to the considered correct answer 81 degrees both of it may be the correct conclusion but by just looking to the formal reasoning of the solution of 81 degrees we cannot assume it's principles unless it does not portrays any actual 100% proof in that situation so 30 is the correct answer rather that 81 degrees.
ha ha ha
wo nice one
nice
i think 81 is wrong answer bcoz line CD & AE makes angle of 111
79 is the answer... :(
superb
Too good...
it is not perpendicular
It's too good, Sir. I couldn't think the way you've done it. It's awesome. Math is at its best!
but sir how can u assume AC=AD=1...if we give any other value to these sides then there will be problem to solve above said equations..
Log in to reply
since ACD=ADC ISOSCELES TRIANGLE!
Log in to reply
i know these two values are the same but how we say that these values are unit....
Log in to reply
@Vijay Sharma – Not a single scalar measure is given in the problem statement, so the number chosen for the length of AC and AD is irrelevant. The problem could probably have been solved with the assumption AC = AD = n, but that would make the simplifications and computations more complicated, so AC = AD = 1 is a nice choice.
good
Nice approach !
Brilliant!!!
Awesome Solution..Great Work!!!
I couldn´t remember the way to solve it. It was one of the most difficult parts of mathematics for me in high school :)
let DC and EA intersects at P...so, angle aCd=aCp=48, angle cAe=cAp=63 than angle cPa=69... in the triangular EDP, angle ePd=69...coz angle ePd=cPa...and the triangular EDP is has ED=EP... therefore, angle cDe=pDe=ePd=69 degree.... in reply to @Eloy Machado ....ur assumption is useless and wrong...M can never ever be the midpoint of CD which is bisected by AE...and u cannot just LET AC=AD coz angle dAc is not equal to 90 degree...
Log in to reply
Read CAREFULLY my solution, please.
Log in to reply
i read it...u r wrong...
Log in to reply
@Tanzim Khan – Read it again and again. Stress on CAREFULLY, please. The solution is correct. Verify with the solution given by One Top. Different approach same answer.
what technique you do sir?? i couldnt understand it..you're so GREAt
84 < its wrong :(
This is wrong as CDE has many solution according to the angles BDE, BED and AED. I can give you number of combinations that can work. Try: BED, BDE, AED and CDE as 92, 70, 49 and 83 Try: BED, BDE, AED and CDE as 93, 69, 48 and 84 and so on If you want your solution will be: BED, BDE, AED and CDE as 90, 72, 51 and 81
If u put the value CDE=54 degrees then the whole system matches.
just get a protractor then measure it. if the correctness of the visual aid is 100% then the protractor can get an answer but if the visual aid is wrong then how can you give a correct given. hahahahaha.
48
I solved it using simultaneous linear equations, with the data the small triangle in the mid has angles 69, cde and aed. Taking cde as x and aed as y, x+y=111, the next part is a bit unconventional. If you calculate the difference in angles for ecd and cda you get 18 which is the same result when you calculate the difference between angle ead and cea. Using this the difference between dca and x should be the same as that between cae and y. Therefore we get 48 - x=63 - y, which gets to y - x= 15
Solving these we get y=63, and x=48 and so the angle cde comes out as 48.
my solution is not by representing a mathematical solution ,.,i draw the illustrated triangle and i able to draw the exact measurement of all angles of the triangle by using an instrument that measures an angle which is a protractor ....i able to measure the angle of angle CDE which is 78 degree....
My way is autocad
very complicated ans
I got 60 too without considering the proposed law, all conditions were satisfied.
Some diagrams to support this answer would be great to follow...
Yes, I have done this!
nice solution :)
panis lan q!
my answer is 75 degrees and i used simple angle theorems and i got it :-) but 81, i think is wrong!!!!!!
sir how you could say that the angle of CDA = the angle of ACD? thx.
angle DCE equal 30 as we subtracted angle DCA FROM ANGLE ACE 78-48 so we got 30 so angle DCE equal 30 since angle CED is a right angle its measur equal 90 so 180 -(30+90)= 60 so angle CDE EQUAL 60 degree .
ai vc fuma um baseado loco e resolve isso
how can you assume it sir?
@Prakash Mulabagal sir , i am a student of MPA , std. 9 . this problem is similar to the new year problem 2014 !!
Sir, how can you say AM is perpendicular to CD? if you trace all the angle. you get angle ACD=48 then angle AMC = 69
Log in to reply
Triangle ACD is isósceles, and my point M is the midpoint of CD, so AM is perpendicular to CD. Maybe your point M isn't the same as mine.
M is not the intersecting point of AE and CD. He assumes M is the midpoint of CD.
it is wrong assumption
correct answer is 48 because angle ACD = angle EDC alternate angles
Log in to reply
Alternate abgles happen only when a line intersects two paralell lines, here the sides of the triangle ABC are not parallel
If AC =AR since triangleACD is isosceles,we should be able to draw acircle with A as midpoint and Radius = AC =AD.In which case BC is a tangent which is not possible as angle BCA not a right angle.Please correct me if I have erred.
Log in to reply
my mistake.BC is a secant and C becomes it's entry point to the circle.
Look at my steps, I think it makes sense and logically.
Your assumption: The midpoint is M.
From your answer we can get ∠AMC = 180° - ∠ACD - ∠EAC = 69°
Agree for this far?
Then, we can get ∠AMD = 180° - ∠AMC = 111°
Total of ΔADM = 180°
It makes sense, doesn’t it?
We know that ∠ECA + ∠EDA should be 180°
So, ∠CDE = 54°
Can u give me correction if I made a mistake, please?
Thank you
Log in to reply
"From your answer we can get ∠AMC = 180° - ∠ACD - ∠EAC = 69° Agree for this far?" these lines are totally wrong.
Log in to reply
can u explain? because that i know the sum of triangle AMC should be 180°
and then please look at my calculation
in triangle CAM, ∠CAM = 63°, ∠AMC = 69°, ∠MCA = 48°
in triangle ECM, ∠CEM = 39°, ∠EMC = 111°, ∠MCE = 30°
in triangle ADM, ∠AMD = 111°, ∠MDA = 48°, ∠DAM = 21°
in triangle EDM, ∠DEM = 57°, ∠EMD = 69°, ∠MDE = 54°
in triangle BED, ∠B = 18°, ∠BED = 84°, ∠BDE = 78°
how do u come at AMC =180 - ACD - EAC.. look carefully AMC =180 - ACD - MAC
Log in to reply
∠EAC = ∠MAC
and then 180 is total degree of triangle AMC
my calculation
in triangle CAM, ∠CAM = 63°, ∠AMC = 69°, ∠MCA = 48°
in triangle ECM, ∠CEM = 39°, ∠EMC = 111°, ∠MCE = 30°
in triangle ADM, ∠AMD = 111°, ∠MDA = 48°, ∠DAM = 21°
in triangle EDM, ∠DEM = 57°, ∠EMD = 69°, ∠MDE = 54°
in triangle BED, ∠B = 18°, ∠BED = 84°, ∠BDE = 78°
Angle BAC= 60 degree. Angle acb= 60 dca +cad=cdb 90 degree cda=30 +60. =90. But we dont know about edc .So let edc be x. So because angle on straight line is 180. So thus, 90+x -90 +90 =180. which implies x=90. Angle cde=90.
easy to understand solution :)
A Synthetic Solution along the lines of Langley's Adventitious Angles: Draw a line AG at 24° to AC meeting BC in G. Join G to D & observe that / AGC = 180 -78-24 =78°. So in tr. AGC we've AG = AC. Now / ADC = 180 -84 -48 = 48°. Thus, AD = AC = AG, But / DAG = 84 -24=60°. Thus, triangle ADG is equilateral. Now observe that / EAG =60-21=39° while / EGA=180 -78=102°; hence / GEA=180 -102 -39 =39°. This makes triangle EGA isosceles with GE = AG = GD. Now / EGD =102 -60 =42° which, in turn, means that / GDE=/ GED= (180-42)/2 = 69° and therefore / CDE = 180 -- 69 -30 = 81°. (Incidentally, /DEA = 30°, same as in Langley)
Yet another way to look at this: Once we locate G as above & prove that GA = GE = GD, we can say that a circle with G as centre and radius = GE will pass through points E, D & A. Now greater /_ AGE = 360 -102 =258° and thus / ADE=258/2 =129° which makes / CDE=129 -48 =81°.
Log in to reply
which angle is 102?
Log in to reply
AG is drawn such that / CAG = 24° (meeting BC in G). Now / BCA=78° and / CAG=24°; hence / CGA = 180 -78-24=78° . So / BGA = / AGE =180 - 78 =102°
That is even better! Similar to Mercer's solution.
i think you guys, make it complicated. math is simple. my answer is 48. :)
Very nice solution!
180-48-63=69 degrees
how u prove AD=AC=AG
how do u sketch a line at 24 and where the place is?
Look at my steps, I think it makes sense and logically.
Your assumption: The midpoint is M.
From your answer we can get ∠AMC = 180° - ∠ACD - ∠EAC = 69°
Agree for this far?
Then, we can get ∠AMD = 180° - ∠AMC = 111°
Total of ΔADM = 180°
It makes sense, doesn’t it?
We know that ∠ECA + ∠EDA should be 180°
So, ∠CDE = 54°
Can u give me correction if I made a mistake, please?
Thank you
A very neat and ingenious solution!
Is there a solution not involving ACD being isoceles? All these Langley's problems are similar and rely on the same proof.
G is not so arbitrary. Is the intersection between CE and the circle with center A and radius AC. Isn't it? Such a circle was already mentioned before after finding that AC=AD.
Ahmad, among all the solutions presented, I liked yours the most. However I was not able to follow the path and prove that Tr. CDF is equilateral. Could you please elaborate on that? Thanks, R. De Souza
Kya be chodu angle AEC= 39 HOGA chutiya
extraordinary answer!
The problem can be generalized, here are the sufficient information I will use from this configuration: C A = D A , ∠ B C D = 3 0 ∘ , 2 ∠ C E A = ∠ A C B .
Construct F = C on B C such that A F = A C , then ∠ F A E = ∠ A F E − ∠ F E A = ∠ A C E − ∠ C E A = ∠ C E A , which means F A = F E . In addition, observe that A is the circumcenter of △ C F D ; therefore ∠ F A D = 2 ∠ D C F = 6 0 ∘ and △ A F D is equilateral. Hence F E = F A = F D , deducing that F is the circumcenter of △ A D E . Thus :
∠ E D C = ∠ E D A − ∠ C D A = 9 0 ∘ + ∠ C E A − ∠ C D A
For this special configuration, ∠ E D C = 9 0 + 3 9 − 4 8 = 8 1 ∘
As simple as it can be!
Log in to reply
If it is simple enough can you please construct a diagram? Cause i am struggling
Wrong, u cant generalize
Using Sine Rule,
sin 6 3 ∘ sin 4 8 ∘ sin 3 9 ∘ sin 8 4 ∘ sin x ∘ = sin ( 3 0 ∘ + x ∘ )
Solving, sin x = 0 . 9 8 7 6 8 8 x = 8 1 ∘
How I got it? Here:
Let C D intersect E A at F and E C = m C D = n C A = b ∠ C D E = x ∠ D E C = y Chasing angles, ∠ C E A = 3 9 ∘ ∠ E C D = 3 0 ∘ ∠ C A E = 6 3 ∘ ∠ C D A = 4 8 ∘
Sine rule says, in a triangle, sin A a sin B = b
So, in △ C E A , sin 6 3 ∘ m sin 3 9 ∘ = b
Now, in △ C D A , sin 4 8 ∘ b sin 8 4 ∘ = n ⇒ sin 6 3 ∘ m sin 3 9 ∘ ⋅ sin 4 8 ∘ sin 8 4 ∘ = n
In △ E D C 1 8 0 ∘ − ( x + 3 0 ∘ ) = y sin x m sin y = n
sin ( 1 8 0 ∘ − θ ) = sin θ
So, we get m sin 6 3 ∘ sin 4 8 ∘ sin 3 9 ∘ sin 8 4 ∘ = m sin x sin y ⇒ sin 6 3 ∘ sin 4 8 ∘ sin 3 9 ∘ sin 8 4 ∘ sin x = sin ( x + 3 0 ∘ )
Solve it to get the answer!
Please use words to explain what you are doing. Not everyone can be a mind reader.
Please use words to explain what you are doing. Not everyone can be a mind reader.
Log in to reply
I see. I was actually too lazy to do it... :)
Log in to reply
be good and tell us what did you do?
Log in to reply
@Aza Ama – There you go! I have given my solution!
Log in to reply
@Kishore S. Shenoy – Thanks.
Instead of saying "
sin
x
=
0
.
9
8
7
…
⇒
x
=
8
1
∘
", you could
1. Explain why the answer is unique (in the relevant domain)
2. Show that
x
=
8
1
satisfies the conditions.
Log in to reply
@Calvin Lin – I did not get you... can you explain?
In my solution I assumed the length of AC to be 1, then I used sine law and cosine law to find for the required angle.
From what is given, <CDA = 48, so triangle ACD is isosceles. Let CA = AD = 1. By the Law of sines, CD/ sin(84) = 1/ sin(48), so CD = 1.338261212.Filling some angles, < COA = 69, where O is the intersection of EA and CD., <EAD = 21, <BCD = 30, < CEA = 39. Define < AED by t. . Then by Sine Law, ED / sin(21, so ED, = .35836795/ sin(t). Also ED/sin(30) = CD/sin(39 + t) = 1/ sin(t). Using the value for CD and equating these two equations for ED , we can solve for t; t = 30, and from triangle EDO, we have x = 180 -t - 69 = 81. Ed Gray
Let AE and CD intersect at F. Following are the angles we get.
ACD.. =.. 48,......... ADC.. =.. 48,.......... ECD.. =.. 30,.......... EAC.. =.. 63,.......... EAD.. =... 21,..... AEC.. =.. 39 .......
EFC.. =.. DFA.. =.. 111, .......... DFE.. =.. AFC.. =.. 69,.......... CDE.. =.. X ........... DEA.. =.. Y.. =.. 111.. -.. X
Let AC = AD = a, since isosceles triangle CAD has two 48 angles.
Applying sin rule to the following triangles,
ACE :- EC/sin63 = a/sin39
CED :- EC/sinX = ED/sin30 ...............> sinX/EC = sin30/ED
AED :- a/sinY = ED/sin21...............................................................................................................................
( a/sinY )
( sinX/EC )
( EC/sin63 ) = ( a/sin39 )
( sin30/ED)
( ED/sin21)
sinX/{ sin( 111 - X ) } = ( sin63/ sin39 ) * ( sin30/ sin21) .........................................................................
EXPANDING sin( 111 - X ) AND SIMPLIFYING WE GET X = 81.
Sorry I am not able to copy the sketch I have with me.
Look at my steps, I think it makes sense and logically.
Your assumption: The midpoint is M.
From your answer we can get ∠AMC = 180° - ∠ACD - ∠EAC = 69°
Agree for this far?
Then, we can get ∠AMD = 180° - ∠AMC = 111°
Total of ΔADM = 180°
It makes sense, doesn’t it?
We know that ∠ECA + ∠EDA should be 180°
So, ∠CDE = 54°
Can u give me correction if I made a mistake, please?
Thank you
Log in to reply
may I know why ∠ECA + ∠EDA should be 180°? Isn't it that rule only apply when there is a quadrilateral in a circle?
Log in to reply
the sum of opposite corner is 180°, isn't it? because ECAD is a quadrilateral, i thought the rule is valid for all quadrilaterals not only a quadrilateral in a circle like u told me,.. but when i try to count opposite corner of a trapezoid that has two angles 90°, yes the rule doesn't apply in all quadrilaterals. thanks.
but i am still sure my answer for ∠CDE = 54° makes sense when i count every angle in all triangles there, please give me more correction if u found out the mistakes. thanks again :)
my calculation
in triangle CAM, ∠CAM = 63°, ∠AMC = 69°, ∠MCA = 48°
in triangle ECM, ∠CEM = 39°, ∠EMC = 111°, ∠MCE = 30°
in triangle ADM, ∠AMD = 111°, ∠MDA = 48°, ∠DAM = 21°
in triangle EDM, ∠DEM = 57°, ∠EMD = 69°, ∠MDE = 54°
in triangle BED, ∠B = 18°, ∠BED = 84°, ∠BDE = 78°
Log in to reply
@Yossie Yoshua – No, the sum of the angles of opposite corners of a quadrilateral is 180° if and only if the quadrilateral is cyclic. Take a diamond for instance — as it becomes thinner, the sum of one pair of opposite angles increases to 360° while the sum of the other pair decreases to 0°, meaning that if the quadrilateral is not forced to be cyclic, then the sum of opposite angles is not constant. As for the answer you got, having all angles fit does not necessarily mean you have found the correct answer. This will become clear when you try to draw it out accurately with a protractor and straight lines —it is an impossible shape. In fact, substituting other random values for ∠CDE, and calculating the remaining angles from that value will also yield many plausible set of values for each angle like what you've found, but there is only one correct one (which happens to be ∠CDE = 81°). All the rest are impossible shapes with disconnected lines. Hope that helped :)
81 is not the correct answer! because on substituting the value for the solution..and there after cross checking it... leads to a contradiction. sum angles of a triangle should be 180.. if we take 81 as angle CDE the sum of angles of a triangle BDE is just 138..
Problem Loading...
Note Loading...
Set Loading...
By angle chasing we find ∠ E C D = 3 0 ° , ∠ A E C = 3 9 ° , ∠ E A D = 2 1 ° , ∠ C D A = ∠ A C D = 4 8 ° . So △ A C D is isosceles.
Let M be the midpoint of C D . So, A M is the perpendicular bissector.
WLOG, let A C = A D = 1 . So, C M = M D = cos 4 8 ° and C D = 2 cos 4 8 ° . Let ∠ D E A be α .
By sine rule in △ C D E the get: C D sin ( 3 9 ° + α ) = E D sin 3 0 ° ⇒ 2 cos 4 8 ° sin ( 3 9 ° + α ) = E D sin 3 0 ° .
By sine rule in △ A D E the get: A D sin ( α ) = E D sin 2 1 ° ⇒ 1 sin ( α ) = E D sin 2 1 ° .
Doing the math with the 2 above equations, we get: cos 4 8 ° sin ( 3 9 ° + α ) = sin 2 1 ° sin ( α )
Since cos 4 8 ° = sin 4 2 ° = 2 sin 2 1 ° cos 2 1 ° we can rewrite the last equation as: sin ( α ) sin ( 3 9 ° + α ) = 2 cos 2 1 °
Since sin ( 3 9 ° + α ) = sin 3 9 ° cos α + sin α cos 3 9 ° we will get in left side of equation:
sin α sin 3 9 ° cos α + sin α cos 3 9 ° = sin 3 9 ° cot α + cos 3 9 °
Now, we will need some creativity in right side: Write 2 1 ° as ( 6 0 ° − 3 9 ° ) :
2 cos 2 1 ° = 2 cos ( 6 0 ° − 3 9 ° ) = 2 ( cos 6 0 ° cos 3 9 ° + sin 6 0 ° sin 3 9 ° ) = cos 3 9 ° + 3 sin 3 9 ° .
Now, the equation is:
sin 3 9 ° cot α + cos 3 9 ° = cos 3 9 ° + 3 sin 3 9 °
Then:
sin 3 9 ° cot α = 3 sin 3 9 °
and finally: cot α = 3 . Therefore, α = 3 0 ° .
Returning to the △ C D E and plugging in α = 3 0 ° , we have 3 9 ° + 3 0 ° + ∠ C D E + 3 0 ° = 1 8 0 ° ⇒ ∠ C D E = 8 1 ° .
And we are done.