Angles in an equilateral pentagon

Geometry Level 4

Let A B C D E ABCDE be an equilateral convex pentagon such that A B C = 13 6 \angle ABC=136^\circ and B C D = 10 4 \angle BCD=104^\circ . What is the measure (in degrees) of A E D \angle AED ?

Note: An equilateral polygon is a polygon whose sides are all of the same length. It does not imply that all the internal angles are equal, nor that the polygon is cyclic.


The answer is 164.

This section requires Javascript.
You are seeing this because something didn't load right. We suggest you, (a) try refreshing the page, (b) enabling javascript if it is disabled on your browser and, finally, (c) loading the non-javascript version of this page . We're sorry about the hassle.

8 solutions

Ariel Gershon
Mar 23, 2017

Draw the lines A C \overline{AC} and B D \overline{BD} . Let's label their point of intersection Q Q .

Given that all sides of the pentagon are equal, the triangles Δ A B C ΔABC and Δ B C D ΔBCD are isosceles.

Thus C B D = C D B = 38 ∠CBD = ∠CDB = 38 and B A C = B C A = 22 ∠BAC = ∠BCA = 22 .

Thus B Q C = 120 ∠BQC = 120 . Thus B Q A = C Q D = 60 ∠BQA = ∠CQD = 60 and A Q D = 120 ∠AQD = 120 .

Also, D B A = 98 ∠DBA = 98 and A C D = 82 ∠ACD = 82 .

Draw the line segment B R \overline{BR} such that D B R = 60 ∠DBR = 60 and R R lies on A C \overline{AC} .

Similarly, draw the line segment C S \overline{CS} such that A C S = 60 ∠ACS = 60 and S S lies on B D \overline{BD} .

Note that Δ B Q R ΔBQR and Δ C Q S ΔCQS are equilateral triangles.

Also note that A B R = 38 ∠ABR = 38 and D C S = 22 ∠DCS = 22 .

Therefore, the triangles Δ A B R , Δ C B Q ΔABR, ΔCBQ , and Δ C D S ΔCDS are all congruent.

Therefore A R = Q S \overline{AR} = \overline{QS} and R Q = S D \overline{RQ} = \overline{SD} , so A Q = D Q \overline{AQ} = \overline{DQ} .

Draw the line E Q \overline{EQ} . Note that the triangles Δ A E Q ΔAEQ and Δ D E Q ΔDEQ are congruent.

Therefore E Q EQ splits A Q D ∠AQD in half, so that A Q E = D Q E = 60 ∠AQE = ∠DQE = 60 .

Now let's compare the triangles Δ Q E D ΔQED and Δ Q C D ΔQCD . They have two pairs of equal sides ( D Q = D Q DQ = DQ and C D = D E CD = DE ), and they have one pair of angles equal ( D Q C = D Q E = 60 ∠DQC = ∠DQE = 60 ).

We have a similar situation with the triangles Δ Q E D ΔQED and Δ Q B A ΔQBA : D Q = A Q DQ = AQ , D E = A B DE = AB , and D Q E = B Q A ∠DQE = ∠BQA .

However, in both cases the congruent angle is not in between the two congruent sides. So essentially, we have an "ambiguous case" where Δ Q E D ΔQED is either congruent to Δ Q C D ΔQCD or Δ Q B A ΔQBA . So Q E D = 82 ∠QED = 82 or 98 98 , and hence A E D = 2 ( Q E D ) = ∠AED = 2(∠QED) = either 164 164 or 196 196 .

Of course, we are given that A B C D E ABCDE is a convex pentagon so that only leaves one possibility: A E D = 164 \angle AED = \boxed{164} .

Woah, among all these solutions, this is the elementary-est solution. It might be longer than the others but it's the simplest to understand.

Pi Han Goh - 4 years, 2 months ago

Log in to reply

Thanks! Yes it is a little long, though I tried to make it shorter by skipping a lot of explanations. In questions that just involve angles, my instinct is to try to find a simple angle-chasing solution, and luckily I found one this time. That does make it elementary, in the sense that I just used simple geometric constructions and properties of triangles. I think it's also insightful as it shows some interesting constructions within the pentagon.

Ariel Gershon - 4 years, 2 months ago

Thus C B D = C D B = 38 ∠CBD = ∠CDB = 38 and B A C = B C A = 22 ∠BAC = ∠BCA = 22 .

I do not understand how you deduced the magnitude of the two angles. From the fact that the triangles are isosceles, one can deduce that the angles are equal, but how does one get their magnitude?

Agnishom Chattopadhyay - 4 years, 2 months ago

Log in to reply

The sum of the angles in any triangle is 180 degrees. In C B D \triangle CBD we have B C D = 104 \angle BCD = 104 , so the sum of the other two angles is 180 104 = 76 180 - 104 = 76 . Since the other two angles are equal, they must each be 76 ÷ 2 = 38 76 ÷ 2 = 38 .

It's a similar calculation for A B C \triangle ABC : ( 180 136 ) ÷ 2 = 22 (180-136) ÷ 2 = 22 .

Ariel Gershon - 4 years, 2 months ago

waaaooww, this is magnificent! Elementary, elegant and brilliant! Great!

Azzam Labib - 3 years, 10 months ago
Michael Mendrin
Mar 19, 2017

Anytime we have a figure of angles and line segments where there is one point (here point E) that is defined by the intersection of two lines, everywhere else being defined by rational angles, should the angle of that so-defined point is also rational, more likely than not there is a construction involving only figures with rational angles, and it's a matter of finding it. The above graphic shows a combination of a rhombus with an equilateral triangle yielding the same numbers for this equilateral convex pentagon.

There is another equilateral pentagon possible with the same angles 136 , 104 136, 104 , but it's not convex. It's instructive to see how another such construction can be had for this one.

Moderator note:

Regarding the uniqueness of the two solutions given:

Because of the side lengths being fixed and the two given angles, all the points marked red ( A , B , C , (A, B, C, and D ) D) are fixed in relation to each other. That means the only possible variation is the placement of point E . E. Given a line segment A D , AD, it must form an isosceles triangle A E D AED where the congruent sides measure the same as those already given; there are only two ways of doing this (corresponding to the pentagon being concave or convex) so there are only two possible solutions.

Oh wow, tbh I didn't realize it was an equilateral triangle on a rhombus.

I could have guessed it given that those angles summed up to 24 0 240 ^ \circ .

Calvin Lin Staff - 4 years, 2 months ago

Log in to reply

Calvin, it's a kind of a conjecture that I have is that whenever we have a figure with all rational angles, including one unknown rational angle, which cannot be determined by angle-chasing, then there exists some kind of a construction involving rational angles that makes the determination. In other words, "if the solution looks simple, usually there's a reason why it's simple". See my twisting a prism problem about that, which is why I decided to publish it.

So far I haven't yet found a counterexample of this, i.e., an unknown rational angle is found only by fairly strenuous means involving things like trigonometry or coordinate geometry, where the "nice" number just pops up for no apparent reason.

Let me look at Gu's solution now.

Michael Mendrin - 4 years, 2 months ago

What is the significance of the two angles summing up to 240? can anything be referred?

Mission Cat - 2 years, 9 months ago

The problem talks about a convex pentagon, so the second drawing, although interesting, is irrelevant.

Ilan Amity - 4 years, 2 months ago

Log in to reply

Yes, you are right, llan, it is totally irrelevant.

Michael Mendrin - 4 years, 2 months ago

Log in to reply

Is it really irrelevant? If we construct a solution for the convex case we might still need to prove this is unique.

Malcolm Rich - 4 years, 2 months ago

Log in to reply

@Malcolm Rich Given 2 points with a distance between them less than 2, then there are only 2 other points that have distances of 1 from both such points. So, I don't see how those two cases described aren't unique. But, of course, the constructions or proofs of either aren't unique, which is another matter.

Michael Mendrin - 4 years, 2 months ago
Marta Reece
Mar 19, 2017

We can arbitrarily set the length of the side as 1 1 and define x = A C x=AC and y = A D y=AD .

From triangle A B C ABC using the law of cosine we get x 2 = 1 + 1 2 × c o s ( 13 6 ) = 3.439 x^2=1+1-2\times cos(136^\circ)=3.439 , x = 1.854 x=1.854 .

A B C \triangle ABC is isosceles, so A C B = 1 2 × ( 18 0 13 6 ) = 2 2 \angle ACB=\frac{1}{2}\times(180^\circ-136^\circ)=22^\circ . This leaves A C D = 104 22 = 8 2 \angle ACD=104-22=82^\circ .

From triangle A C D ACD we get y 2 = x 2 + 1 2 × x × c o s ( 8 2 ) = 3.923 y^2=x^2+1-2\times x\times cos(82^\circ)=3.923 . y = 1.981 y=1.981 .

Another use of law of cosines, this time to get angle α = A E D \alpha=\angle AED from triangle A E D AED :

c o s ( α ) = 1 + 1 y 2 2 = 0.961 cos(\alpha)=\frac{1+1-y^2}{2}=-0.961 , α = 16 4 \alpha=164^\circ .

If one were interested in the rest of the angles: From the isosceles triangle A E D AED it is easy to get the two 8 8^\circ angles, and in the triangle A C D ACD we know two sides, x x and y y and the angle D C A = 8 2 DCA=82^\circ . Using law of sines, we get C D A = 6 8 \angle CDA=68^\circ and from the total for the triangle the final one.

After all the trigonometries, I'm surprised that the answer is still an integer. I believe Calvin curated the numbers carefully.

Is it possible to find other angles, though?

Christopher Boo - 4 years, 2 months ago

Log in to reply

Finding the remaining angles is not difficult, and I have added them to the bottom of the solution.

Marta Reece - 4 years, 2 months ago

Also, note that for a regular Pentagon, the sum of all the internal angels is 180 * (5-2) = 540.

Judy Gu - 4 years, 2 months ago

Log in to reply

The sum of internal angles holds for any pentagon, as long as it is not self-intersecting, but it doesn't give us the angles C A D CAD and A D C ADC individually, only their sum. So law of sines is still needed. That sum could give us the last angle, once the other is known, of course.

Marta Reece - 4 years, 2 months ago

Oh, very nice. Much neater than the solution that I had. (As such, I might have over judged the difficulty of the problem. I've adjusted the position of this problem, so those who view this quiz subsequently will see it as the 2nd question, instead of the 5th.)

Technically/ideally, the values of x x and y y should be left in exact form and not approximated out. That shouldn't be too tricky to work with.

Calvin Lin Staff - 4 years, 2 months ago

Exactly how I did it (on the third try). If you use a calculator that stores numbers so that you don't have to round anything, the answer is exactly 164 too, no rounding necessary. I figured that might happen since the question mentions nothing about rounding, but it was still cool that it happened that way.

Louis W - 4 years, 2 months ago

Log in to reply

Yeah, I cheated too using your reasoning and got the same answer. What's left is able to prove that 164 is the EXACT answer...

Pi Han Goh - 4 years, 2 months ago

Instead of using trigonometry i used just geometric techniques.just see that since all sides of bcde are equal so 104 + 76 equals 180.so angle Eba is 136-76=60.since opposite angles are equal in rhombus bcde , the angle Deb is 104.so the total angle and is 104+60=164 degrees.simple and elegant.!!

NIKHESH KUMAR - 4 years, 2 months ago

Log in to reply

Distance BE is not given, so you don't know to start with that BCDE is actually a rhombus. It turns out to be in this case, as is shown in the second solution below, but if the angles were chosen slightly differently, your solution would not work.

Marta Reece - 4 years, 2 months ago
Brandon Monsen
Mar 21, 2017

A method that I like to use on these difficult looking geometry problems is to see what happens when we try to force something pretty.

WLOG, assume that all of the sides are of lenght 1 1 unit, since we can scale the figure without changing the angles.

We can look at what happens when we form a segment parallel to C D CD with length 1 1 starting from B B and connecting it to some other point B B' such that B B BB' passes through the figure given. Therefore C B B = 7 6 \angle CBB' = 76^{\circ} , which leaves A B B = 6 0 \angle AB'B = 60^{\circ} . Note that this point is unique under these conditions.

Now, let's connect point B B' to A A . This will result in an isosceles triangle; B B = A B = 1 BB' = AB = 1 with an included angle of 6 0 60^{\circ} , so triangle A B B \triangle ABB' must be equilateral which implies that A B = 1 AB'=1 as well.

Now, connect point B B' to D D . This must result in a rhombus B B C D BB'CD , since B B C D BB' \parallel CD and B B = C B = C D = 1 BB'=CB=CD=1 . This then implies that B D = 1 B'D=1 .

We now have constructed a equilateral pentagon equivalent to that of the figure given with the exception of point E E and its connecting segments, since we are unsure of where B B' lies in comparison to E E .

The last thing to consider is how, given points A , B , C , D A,B,C,D set up exactly like the figure, can we connect points A A and D D using two segments of length one? It is fairly straightforward to see that if its possible (our construction proves that it is) there are exactly two ways to connect these points, one of which would result in a convex polygon, the other a concave polygon. This means that our constructed figure will either be the convex one, and thus B B' lies exactly on E E and we have all the information necessary to solve the problem, or the concave one (I'll discuss this case later)

Our constructed diagram gives A B D = 16 4 \angle AB'D = \boxed{164^{\circ}} , which matches the concavity of the diagram given (all angles are less than 18 0 180^{\circ} ) and is then our answer.


If it didn't match the concavity given, ie gave an angle greater than 18 0 180^{\circ} , we can then form a rhombus A B D E AB'DE since all sides are the same. The angle we solved for would then be the 36 0 360^{\circ} compliment to the interior rhombus angle, which is the desired angle.

What is your motivation for setting up a parallel line B B BB' ? That seems pretty random to me.

Christopher Boo - 4 years, 2 months ago

Log in to reply

I think it's just that this is the easiest way to explain the solution. It may not be how the solution was found.

Malcolm Rich - 4 years, 2 months ago

Log in to reply

Correct. Initially I saw that we can divide the yellow angle into the 18 0 180^{\circ} compliment of the pink angle, and a 6 0 60^{\circ} angle which screamed equilateral triangle and rhombus. The next step was to show that this construction matched the diagram, which is how my solution came about.

Even if that wasn't the case, (where they lined up exactly) I always try to force something pretty as my first steps towards solving math team geometry problems since usually those questions have quick and elegant solutions that can be arrived at using these new constructions

Brandon Monsen - 4 years, 2 months ago

Actually you don't need to consider the case where your construction doesn't match the concavity. You already showed that A B B \triangle ABB' is equilateral, which means A B B = 60 \angle AB'B = 60 ; and B B C D BB'CD is a rhombus, so D B B = D C B = 104 \angle DB'B = \angle DCB = 104 . Therefore A B D = A B B + D B B = 164 \angle AB'D = \angle AB'B + \angle DB'B = 164 . This proves that you got the convex solution.

By the way, this was a smart way of solving the problem!

Ariel Gershon - 4 years, 2 months ago

Let x x be the side length of the pentagon. Let's consider triangle A B C ABC . By cosine law, we have

m 2 = x 2 + x 2 2 ( x ) ( x ) c o s 136 = 2 x 2 ( 1 c o s 136 ) m^2 = x^2 + x^2 - 2(x)(x)cos 136 = 2x^2(1 - cos136)

m = x 2 1 c o s 136 m = x\sqrt{2}\sqrt{1 - cos 136}

By cosine law again,

x 2 = x 2 + m 2 2 ( x ) ( m ) c o s θ x^2 = x^2 + m^2 - 2(x)(m) cosθ

After some substitution, we get

θ = 22 ° θ = 22°

Solving for ρ ρ , we get

ρ = 104 22 = 82 ° ρ = 104 - 22 = 82°

Let's consider triangle A C D ACD . By cosine law, we have

k 2 = m 2 + x 2 2 ( m ) ( x ) c o s 82 k^2 = m^2 + x^2 - 2(m)(x) cos82

After some substitution, we get

k 2 = x 2 [ 1 + 2 ( 1 c o s 136 ) 2 2 1 c o s 136 ( c o s 82 ) ] k^2 = x^2[1 + 2(1 - cos 136) - 2\sqrt{2}\sqrt{1 - cos 136} (cos82)]

Let's consider triangle A D E ADE . By cosine law, we have

k 2 = x 2 + x 2 2 ( x ) ( x ) c o s ɸ = 2 x 2 ( 1 c o s ϕ ) k^2 = x^2 + x^2 - 2(x)(x) cosɸ = 2x^2(1 - cos \phi)

Equate k 2 k^2 and k 2 k^2 ,

x 2 [ 1 + 2 ( 1 c o s 136 ) 2 2 1 c o s 136 ( c o s 82 ) ] = 2 x 2 ( 1 c o s ϕ ) x^2[1 + 2(1 - cos 136) - 2\sqrt{2}\sqrt{1 - cos 136} (cos82)] = 2x^2(1 - cos \phi)

After simplifying the above equation, we get

ϕ = 164 ° \boxed{\phi = 164°}

The quadrilateral BCDE is a parallelogram! Easy since then.

Why must that be true?

Calvin Lin Staff - 4 years, 2 months ago
Amed Lolo
Mar 23, 2017

connect points A&B to D as CB=CD so Angle cbd equal to Angle cdb = 38° so < DBA =136-38=98 so cos 38=(BC^2-CD^+BD^2)÷(2BC.BD . ) ~ BD=2BC.cos38 =2k.cos38 at∆ ABD. cos 98=k^2+4.k^2.cos^2 38-AD^2÷2k.2k.cos38 . So AD^2=k^2(4.cos^2 38+1-4.cos 38.cos 98). Ad=1.980536k ,at ∆ AED cosE=(k^2+k^2-1.980536^2.k^2)÷(2k.k) so cos E= -.96126169 so Angle E=164°.

Ah thanks. I was able to follow through this solution once I've connected all the lines in the image.

On the other hand, you have only shown that the angle E is approximately 164, but can you show that the angle is exactly 164?

Pi Han Goh - 4 years, 2 months ago
Malcolm Rich
Mar 22, 2017

My original approach measured the length of AD by reference to sines and cosines of the known external angles using BC as the x-axis. The vector AD is (1+cos44+cos76,sin76-sin44) and summing squares and simplifying gives the length to be [2x (1+cos 44 + cos 76)]^.5. Let's call this y.

Then using y^2 = 2 - 2cosE means that cosE = -cos44-cos76. Or Cos (180-E) = Cos44 + Cos76. The graphical representation of this gives us the same equilateral triangle noted elsewhere which produces the answer of 164.

Make a line BE such that CDEB is a parallelogram. Base on the characteristics of parallelogram, Degree of ∠CBE= 180°-104°=76 ∠BED = ∠BCD = 104° So,∠ABE=136°-76°=60° Since it is an equilateral pentagon, So AB=AE. So,∠ ABE=∠AEB=60° ∴∠AED=∠AEB+∠BED =104°+60°=164°

额 额 - 3 years, 7 months ago

0 pending reports

×

Problem Loading...

Note Loading...

Set Loading...