Another curious identity

Geometry Level 3

cos ( 1 2 ) + cos ( 8 4 ) + cos ( 13 2 ) + cos ( 15 6 ) = ? \large \cos(12^\circ)+\cos(84^\circ)+\cos(132^\circ)+\cos(156^\circ)= \ ?

Extra Credit Problem: Can you generalize this result by writing an analogous equation involving cos ( 36 0 n ) \cos\left(\frac{360^\circ}{n}\right) for any positive integer n n ?


The answer is -0.5.

This section requires Javascript.
You are seeing this because something didn't load right. We suggest you, (a) try refreshing the page, (b) enabling javascript if it is disabled on your browser and, finally, (c) loading the non-javascript version of this page . We're sorry about the hassle.

4 solutions

Using the identities

cos ( α ) + cos ( β ) = 2 cos ( α + β 2 ) cos ( α β 2 ) \cos(\alpha) + \cos(\beta) = 2\cos(\frac{\alpha + \beta}{2})\cos(\frac{\alpha - \beta}{2}) and cos ( 2 θ ) = 2 cos 2 ( θ ) 1 , \cos(2\theta) = 2\cos^{2}(\theta) - 1,

this expression can be written as

cos ( 1 2 ) + cos ( 6 0 ) + cos ( 8 4 ) cos ( 6 0 ) cos ( 4 8 ) cos ( 2 4 ) = \cos(12^{\circ}) + \cos(60^{\circ}) + \cos(84^{\circ}) - \cos(60^{\circ}) - \cos(48^{\circ}) - \cos(24^{\circ}) =

cos ( 1 2 ) + 2 cos ( 1 2 ) cos ( 7 2 ) 1 2 2 cos ( 1 2 ) cos ( 3 6 ) = \cos(12^{\circ}) + 2\cos(12^{\circ})\cos(72^{\circ}) - \dfrac{1}{2} - 2\cos(12^{\circ})\cos(36^{\circ}) =

cos ( 1 2 ) ( 1 + 2 cos ( 7 2 ) 2 cos ( 3 6 ) ) 1 2 = \cos(12^{\circ})(1 + 2\cos(72^{\circ}) - 2\cos(36^{\circ})) - \dfrac{1}{2} =

cos ( 1 2 ) ( 4 cos 2 ( 3 6 ) 2 cos ( 3 6 ) 1 ) 1 2 = 1 2 = 0.5 \cos(12^{\circ})(4\cos^{2}(36^{\circ}) - 2\cos(36^{\circ}) - 1) - \dfrac{1}{2} = -\dfrac{1}{2} = \boxed{-0.5}

since cos ( 3 6 ) \cos(36^{\circ}) is a root of the polynomial 4 t 2 2 t 1. 4t^{2} - 2t - 1.

To see why this is the case, let x = 3 6 . x = 36^{\circ}. Then

3 x = 18 0 2 x sin ( 3 x ) = sin ( 2 x ) 3x = 180^{\circ} - 2x \Longrightarrow \sin(3x) = \sin(2x)

3 sin ( x ) 4 sin 3 ( x ) = 2 sin ( x ) cos ( x ) \Longrightarrow 3\sin(x) - 4\sin^{3}(x) = 2\sin(x)\cos(x)

sin ( x ) ( 4 sin 2 ( x ) + 2 cos ( x ) 3 ) = 0 \Longrightarrow \sin(x)(4\sin^{2}(x) + 2\cos(x) - 3) = 0

sin ( x ) ( 4 cos 2 ( x ) 2 cos ( x ) 1 ) = 0. \Longrightarrow -\sin(x)(4\cos^{2}(x) - 2\cos(x) - 1) = 0.

Now clearly sin ( x ) = sin ( 3 6 ) 0 , \sin(x) = \sin(36^{\circ}) \ne 0, so we can conclude that cos ( x ) = cos ( 3 6 ) \cos(x) = \cos(36^{\circ}) is a root of the polynomial 4 t 2 2 t 1. 4t^{2} - 2t - 1.

Nicely done! You really are the Master of Trigonometry! (+1)

Otto Bretscher - 6 years ago

Log in to reply

Haha. Thanks! I knew that you had a "roots of unity" solution in mind, but I wasn't seeing how to do that so I went down a road more familiar to me. I hadn't heard of the Möbius function before, so I learned something new from your solution. :)

Brian Charlesworth - 6 years ago

Log in to reply

fantastic solution sir.......

Log in to reply

@A Former Brilliant Member Thanks, Chinmay. :)

Brian Charlesworth - 6 years ago

you're a champ

Rama Devi - 6 years ago

Log in to reply

Haha. Thanks, Rama. :)

Brian Charlesworth - 6 years ago

Log in to reply

You're welcome

Rama Devi - 6 years ago

Good solution sir

Rama Devi - 6 years ago
Otto Bretscher
May 25, 2015

Brian has submitted a very fine solution. For the sake of variety, let me suggest a solution based on roots of unity; I'm thinking of these cosines as the shadows of the 30th primitive roots of unity, w w , on the real axis, with w = e 2 k π i / 30 w=e^{2k\pi{i}/30} , for k = 1 , 7 , 11 , 13 , . . . k=1,7,11,13,... .

The sum of these primitive roots of unity is 1 -1 ; one can see this with an inclusion/exclusion kind of argument. Adding conjugate pairs, we get what we want: 2 cos ( 1 × 1 2 ) 2\cos(1\times{12^\circ}) + 2 cos ( 7 × 1 2 ) +2\cos(7\times{12^\circ}) + 2 cos ( 11 × 1 2 ) +2\cos(11\times{12^\circ}) + 2 cos ( 13 × 1 2 ) = 1 +2\cos(13\times{12^\circ})=-1 , so that the sum of the cosines is 1 2 \boxed{-\frac{1}{2}}

In general, the sum of the primitive n n -th roots of unity is μ ( n ) \mu(n) , the Möbius function: it is ( 1 ) m (-1)^m for a square-free number with m m prime factors, and 0 otherwise. Thus μ ( 30 ) = ( 1 ) 3 = 1. \mu(30)=(-1)^3=-1. For n > 2 , n>2, we can generalise our "curious identity" as follows:

cos ( k × 36 0 n ) = 1 2 μ ( n ) \sum\cos\left(\frac{k\times{360^\circ}}{n}\right)=\frac{1}{2}\mu(n) where the sum is taken over all k k with 1 k < n 2 1\leq{k}<\frac{n}{2} that are co-prime with n n .

Here is ALTERNATIVE SOLUTION that does not (explicitly) rely on roots of unity, but it is mathematically equivalent: "By symmetry", we have cos ( k × 1 2 o ) \sum\cos(k\times{12^o}) = cos ( k × 2 4 o ) =\sum\cos(k\times{24^o}) = cos ( k × 3 6 o ) =\sum\cos(k\times{36^o}) = cos ( k × 6 0 o ) =\sum\cos(k\times{60^o}) = cos ( k × 7 2 o ) =\sum\cos(k\times{72^o}) = cos ( k × 12 0 o ) =\sum\cos(k\times{120^o}) = cos ( k × 18 0 o ) = 1 = cos ( 0 o ) =\sum\cos(k\times{180^o})=-1=-\cos(0^o) , where the angle runs through the open interval ( 0 0 , 36 0 0 ) (0^0,360^0) in each case. If we add up Equations 1, 5, 6, and 7 and then subtract 2, 3, and 4, we get our result.

Good solution sir

Rama Devi - 6 years ago
Janine Yu
May 26, 2015

Nice! (+1) Can you elaborate on the last step please, for the benefit of other readers?

Otto Bretscher - 6 years ago

Log in to reply

Thank you! :) I'll work on that

Janine Yu - 6 years ago

Log in to reply

I just posted an "Alternative Solution".... does it make sense?

Otto Bretscher - 6 years ago

Log in to reply

@Otto Bretscher I'm sorry sir, but I'm not familiar with that approach :/

Janine Yu - 6 years ago

Log in to reply

@Janine Yu I'm talking about my second approach, in the last paragraph... no roots of unity or even complex numbers required there. Just think of the fact that the points ( cos ( k × 1 2 o ) , sin ( k × 1 2 o ) ) (\cos(k\times{12^o}),\sin(k\times{12^o)}) are the vertices of a regular 30gon, so that their sum is zero by symmetry. Likewise for the other angles.

Otto Bretscher - 6 years ago

Log in to reply

@Otto Bretscher I'm not familiar with that either, but thank you very much for showing me another way on how to solve this, yours is very much faster and simpler. :)

I've already made the necessary changes on my solution. :)

Janine Yu - 6 years ago

Log in to reply

@Janine Yu Thanks for the update! Now the solution looks very solid.

I'm just curious...have you guys not studied the trig functions in terms of the unit circle? If not, you should... that's really the "right" way to think about sin and cos.

Otto Bretscher - 6 years ago

Log in to reply

@Otto Bretscher We've tackled it on our third year in high school, but we only learned its basics not its applications. Thank you for letting me know about that! I'll go on studying trig functions at a broader range. :)

Janine Yu - 6 years ago

Log in to reply

@Janine Yu Enjoy!

It is helpful to define cos(t) and sin(t) as the coordinates of a point on the unit circle... that gives you all the basic properties and results most directly, in terms of symmetries.

Otto Bretscher - 6 years ago

Log in to reply

@Otto Bretscher Yes, thank you very much! :)

Janine Yu - 6 years ago
Louis W
May 28, 2015

I like doing these types of problems with just trigonometry identities, it's just how I roll. Sometimes you just have to get rather creative to make them work.

cos 12 + cos 84 + cos 132 + cos 156 \color{#20A900}{\cos12}+\color{#69047E}{\cos84}+\color{#20A900}{\cos132}+\color{#69047E}{\cos156} cos θ + cos ϕ = 2 cos θ + ϕ 2 cos θ ϕ 2 \color{#D61F06}{\cos\theta+\cos\phi=2\cos\frac{\theta+\phi}{2}\cos\frac{\theta-\phi}{2}} = 2 cos 72 cos 60 + 2 cos 120 cos 36 = cos 72 cos 36 =2\cos72\cos60+2\cos120\cos36=\cos72-\cos36 Note, if you use cos ( π 2 θ ) = sin θ \color{#D61F06}{\cos(\frac{\pi}{2}-\theta)=\sin\theta} here, you will get sin 18 sin 54 \color{#3D99F6}{\sin18-\sin54} , which is the same point Janine Yu got to before using the pentagon.

cos θ cos ϕ = 2 sin θ + ϕ 2 sin θ ϕ 2 \color{#D61F06}{\cos\theta-\cos\phi=-2\sin\frac{\theta+\phi}{2}\sin\frac{\theta-\phi}{2}} = 2 sin 54 sin 18 = 1 2 ( 2 sin 54 ) ( 2 sin 18 ) =-2\sin54\sin18=-\frac{1}{2}(2\sin54)(2\sin18) sin 2 θ = 2 sin θ cos θ 2 sin θ = sin 2 θ cos θ \color{#D61F06}{\sin2\theta=2\sin\theta\cos\theta}\Rightarrow\color{#D61F06}{2\sin\theta=\frac{\sin2\theta}{\cos\theta}} = 1 2 sin 108 cos 54 sin 36 cos 18 =-\frac{1}{2}\frac{\sin108}{\cos54}\frac{\sin36}{\cos18} sin ( π θ ) = sin θ \color{#D61F06}{\sin(\pi-\theta)=\sin\theta}

cos ( π 2 θ ) = sin θ \color{#D61F06}{\cos(\frac{\pi}{2}-\theta)=\sin\theta} = 1 2 sin 72 sin 36 sin 36 sin 72 = 1 2 =-\frac{1}{2}\frac{\sin72}{\sin36}\frac{\sin36}{\sin72}=\color{#3D99F6}{-\frac{1}{2}}\space\space\space\Box

Elegant solution, very well presented! Thanks! (+1)

I "roll" in the opposite direction... I try to avoid trig identities whenever I can. As Brian likes to say: Diversity is good.

Otto Bretscher - 6 years ago

0 pending reports

×

Problem Loading...

Note Loading...

Set Loading...