cos ( 1 2 ∘ ) + cos ( 8 4 ∘ ) + cos ( 1 3 2 ∘ ) + cos ( 1 5 6 ∘ ) = ?
Extra Credit Problem: Can you generalize this result by writing an analogous equation involving cos ( n 3 6 0 ∘ ) for any positive integer n ?
This section requires Javascript.
You are seeing this because something didn't load right. We suggest you, (a) try
refreshing the page, (b) enabling javascript if it is disabled on your browser and,
finally, (c)
loading the
non-javascript version of this page
. We're sorry about the hassle.
Nicely done! You really are the Master of Trigonometry! (+1)
Log in to reply
Haha. Thanks! I knew that you had a "roots of unity" solution in mind, but I wasn't seeing how to do that so I went down a road more familiar to me. I hadn't heard of the Möbius function before, so I learned something new from your solution. :)
Log in to reply
fantastic solution sir.......
you're a champ
Log in to reply
Haha. Thanks, Rama. :)
Good solution sir
Brian has submitted a very fine solution. For the sake of variety, let me suggest a solution based on roots of unity; I'm thinking of these cosines as the shadows of the 30th primitive roots of unity, w , on the real axis, with w = e 2 k π i / 3 0 , for k = 1 , 7 , 1 1 , 1 3 , . . . .
The sum of these primitive roots of unity is − 1 ; one can see this with an inclusion/exclusion kind of argument. Adding conjugate pairs, we get what we want: 2 cos ( 1 × 1 2 ∘ ) + 2 cos ( 7 × 1 2 ∘ ) + 2 cos ( 1 1 × 1 2 ∘ ) + 2 cos ( 1 3 × 1 2 ∘ ) = − 1 , so that the sum of the cosines is − 2 1
In general, the sum of the primitive n -th roots of unity is μ ( n ) , the Möbius function: it is ( − 1 ) m for a square-free number with m prime factors, and 0 otherwise. Thus μ ( 3 0 ) = ( − 1 ) 3 = − 1 . For n > 2 , we can generalise our "curious identity" as follows:
∑ cos ( n k × 3 6 0 ∘ ) = 2 1 μ ( n ) where the sum is taken over all k with 1 ≤ k < 2 n that are co-prime with n .
Here is ALTERNATIVE SOLUTION that does not (explicitly) rely on roots of unity, but it is mathematically equivalent: "By symmetry", we have ∑ cos ( k × 1 2 o ) = ∑ cos ( k × 2 4 o ) = ∑ cos ( k × 3 6 o ) = ∑ cos ( k × 6 0 o ) = ∑ cos ( k × 7 2 o ) = ∑ cos ( k × 1 2 0 o ) = ∑ cos ( k × 1 8 0 o ) = − 1 = − cos ( 0 o ) , where the angle runs through the open interval ( 0 0 , 3 6 0 0 ) in each case. If we add up Equations 1, 5, 6, and 7 and then subtract 2, 3, and 4, we get our result.
Good solution sir
Nice! (+1) Can you elaborate on the last step please, for the benefit of other readers?
Log in to reply
Thank you! :) I'll work on that
Log in to reply
I just posted an "Alternative Solution".... does it make sense?
Log in to reply
@Otto Bretscher – I'm sorry sir, but I'm not familiar with that approach :/
Log in to reply
@Janine Yu – I'm talking about my second approach, in the last paragraph... no roots of unity or even complex numbers required there. Just think of the fact that the points ( cos ( k × 1 2 o ) , sin ( k × 1 2 o ) ) are the vertices of a regular 30gon, so that their sum is zero by symmetry. Likewise for the other angles.
Log in to reply
@Otto Bretscher – I'm not familiar with that either, but thank you very much for showing me another way on how to solve this, yours is very much faster and simpler. :)
I've already made the necessary changes on my solution. :)
Log in to reply
@Janine Yu – Thanks for the update! Now the solution looks very solid.
I'm just curious...have you guys not studied the trig functions in terms of the unit circle? If not, you should... that's really the "right" way to think about sin and cos.
Log in to reply
@Otto Bretscher – We've tackled it on our third year in high school, but we only learned its basics not its applications. Thank you for letting me know about that! I'll go on studying trig functions at a broader range. :)
Log in to reply
@Janine Yu – Enjoy!
It is helpful to define cos(t) and sin(t) as the coordinates of a point on the unit circle... that gives you all the basic properties and results most directly, in terms of symmetries.
I like doing these types of problems with just trigonometry identities, it's just how I roll. Sometimes you just have to get rather creative to make them work.
cos 1 2 + cos 8 4 + cos 1 3 2 + cos 1 5 6 cos θ + cos ϕ = 2 cos 2 θ + ϕ cos 2 θ − ϕ = 2 cos 7 2 cos 6 0 + 2 cos 1 2 0 cos 3 6 = cos 7 2 − cos 3 6 Note, if you use cos ( 2 π − θ ) = sin θ here, you will get sin 1 8 − sin 5 4 , which is the same point Janine Yu got to before using the pentagon.
cos θ − cos ϕ = − 2 sin 2 θ + ϕ sin 2 θ − ϕ = − 2 sin 5 4 sin 1 8 = − 2 1 ( 2 sin 5 4 ) ( 2 sin 1 8 ) sin 2 θ = 2 sin θ cos θ ⇒ 2 sin θ = cos θ sin 2 θ = − 2 1 cos 5 4 sin 1 0 8 cos 1 8 sin 3 6 sin ( π − θ ) = sin θ
cos ( 2 π − θ ) = sin θ = − 2 1 sin 3 6 sin 7 2 sin 7 2 sin 3 6 = − 2 1 □
Elegant solution, very well presented! Thanks! (+1)
I "roll" in the opposite direction... I try to avoid trig identities whenever I can. As Brian likes to say: Diversity is good.
Problem Loading...
Note Loading...
Set Loading...
Using the identities
cos ( α ) + cos ( β ) = 2 cos ( 2 α + β ) cos ( 2 α − β ) and cos ( 2 θ ) = 2 cos 2 ( θ ) − 1 ,
this expression can be written as
cos ( 1 2 ∘ ) + cos ( 6 0 ∘ ) + cos ( 8 4 ∘ ) − cos ( 6 0 ∘ ) − cos ( 4 8 ∘ ) − cos ( 2 4 ∘ ) =
cos ( 1 2 ∘ ) + 2 cos ( 1 2 ∘ ) cos ( 7 2 ∘ ) − 2 1 − 2 cos ( 1 2 ∘ ) cos ( 3 6 ∘ ) =
cos ( 1 2 ∘ ) ( 1 + 2 cos ( 7 2 ∘ ) − 2 cos ( 3 6 ∘ ) ) − 2 1 =
cos ( 1 2 ∘ ) ( 4 cos 2 ( 3 6 ∘ ) − 2 cos ( 3 6 ∘ ) − 1 ) − 2 1 = − 2 1 = − 0 . 5
since cos ( 3 6 ∘ ) is a root of the polynomial 4 t 2 − 2 t − 1 .
To see why this is the case, let x = 3 6 ∘ . Then
3 x = 1 8 0 ∘ − 2 x ⟹ sin ( 3 x ) = sin ( 2 x )
⟹ 3 sin ( x ) − 4 sin 3 ( x ) = 2 sin ( x ) cos ( x )
⟹ sin ( x ) ( 4 sin 2 ( x ) + 2 cos ( x ) − 3 ) = 0
⟹ − sin ( x ) ( 4 cos 2 ( x ) − 2 cos ( x ) − 1 ) = 0 .
Now clearly sin ( x ) = sin ( 3 6 ∘ ) = 0 , so we can conclude that cos ( x ) = cos ( 3 6 ∘ ) is a root of the polynomial 4 t 2 − 2 t − 1 .