x + x + x + 2 + x 2 + 2 x = 3
Find the only real solution of the equation above.
This section requires Javascript.
You are seeing this because something didn't load right. We suggest you, (a) try
refreshing the page, (b) enabling javascript if it is disabled on your browser and,
finally, (c)
loading the
non-javascript version of this page
. We're sorry about the hassle.
Thanks! Well it took about 2-3 pages of rough work to come up with that substitution
A simple and precise solution. Well Done!👍
x + x + x + 2 + x 2 + 2 x u 2 + u + u 2 + 2 + u u 2 + 2 1 + u 3 − u − u 2 1 + u 3 − u ( 1 + u ) 2 9 − 1 + u 6 u + u 2 9 − 6 u ( 1 + u ) 9 − 6 u − 6 u 2 8 u 2 + 1 0 u − 7 ( 2 u − 1 ) ( 4 u + 7 ) = 3 = 3 = u 2 + 2 = u 2 + 2 = u 2 + 2 = 2 ( 1 + u ) 2 = 2 + 4 u + 2 u 2 = 0 = 0 Let x = u 2 Squaring both sides Multiplying both sides by ( 1 + u ) 2
⟹ u = { 2 1 − 4 7 ⟹ x = 4 1 ⟹ x = 1 6 4 9
⟹ ⎩ ⎨ ⎧ x = 4 1 x = 1 6 4 9 ⟹ 4 1 + 4 1 + 4 1 + 2 + 1 6 1 + 2 1 = 3 ⟹ 1 6 4 9 + 1 6 4 9 + 1 6 4 9 + 2 + 2 5 6 2 4 0 1 + 8 4 9 = 1 1 accepted rejected
Therefore, x = 0 . 2 5
This problem is similar to @Pi Han Goh 's problem (you can check it here ). So, I think the answer is the same. By trial and error, it's true.. I don't know, whether it's good or not.. Hehe
Domain of LHS is x>0.We attempt to find a value of x such that the terms (of LHS) in the square roots become perfect squares.Let us assume that x=t² for some t>0.So, x+2=t²+2.Let t²+2=k² for some k>0.Hence, (k-t)(k+t)=2. Hence, k+t=2 and k-t=1 is a possible solution.So, we get t=1/2 which gives x=1/4. And, on substitution of x=1/4 in LHS it does become 3. Since the function (by function I mean, bring 3 on the LHS and the entire thing on LHS is the function) has positive derivative for x>0, it is strictly increasing for x>0.Also, as f(0)<0 it must have exactly 1 real root.Hence, 1/4 is the only real root of the equation.I believe this proof is not rigorous enough.More rigorous proofs (that can find all possible complex roots ) would be appreciated.
Once you found that 1/4 works, you can argue that the function is strictly increasing in x , hence has at most 1 solution.
Log in to reply
Sir, that is what even I have written in the solution.
Log in to reply
Sorry, I wasn't being clear enough. I was replying to your comment of "I believe this proof is not rigorous enough", and meant to say is that your proof is rigorous + complete. The argument of
is perfectly valid.
Problem Loading...
Note Loading...
Set Loading...
let
x + x + 2 = k
squaring both sides we get
( x ) ( x + 2 ) + x = 2 ( k 2 − 2 )
thus we may write the given equation as
2 ( k 2 − 2 ) + k = 3
solving this we get k = 2
x + x + 2 = 2
on squaring and simplifying we get x = 4 1