Appetizing Apricots

Algebra Level 2

log 2 ( ( 2 + 1 ) ( 2 2 + 1 ) ( 2 4 + 1 ) ( 2 8 + 1 ) ( 2 16 + 1 ) ( 2 32 + 1 ) + 1 ) = ? \displaystyle \log_2 \Big( (2+1)(2^2+1)(2^4+1)(2^8+1)(2^{16}+1)(2^{32}+1)+1 \Big) = \ ?


The answer is 64.

This section requires Javascript.
You are seeing this because something didn't load right. We suggest you, (a) try refreshing the page, (b) enabling javascript if it is disabled on your browser and, finally, (c) loading the non-javascript version of this page . We're sorry about the hassle.

2 solutions

Tanishq Varshney
Apr 7, 2015

l o g 2 ( ( 2 1 ) ( 2 + 1 ) ( 2 2 + 1 ) . . . . ( 2 32 + 1 ) + 1 ) log_{2} ((2-1)(2+1)(2^2+1)....(2^{32}+1)+1)

l o g 2 ( ( 2 2 1 ) ( 2 2 + 1 ) . . . . ( 2 32 + 1 ) + 1 ) log_{2} ((2^{2}-1)(2^2+1)....(2^{32}+1)+1)

l o g 2 ( ( 2 4 1 ) ( 2 4 + 1 ) . . . . ( 2 32 + 1 ) + 1 ) log_{2} ((2^{4}-1)(2^4+1)....(2^{32}+1)+1)

l o g 2 ( ( 2 8 1 ) ( 2 8 + 1 ) . . . . ( 2 32 + 1 ) + 1 ) log_{2} ((2^{8}-1)(2^8+1)....(2^{32}+1)+1)

and so on till

l o g 2 ( 2 64 1 + 1 ) log_{2} (2^{64}-1+1)

64 \boxed{64}

Isn't this question the same as this one ? :)

Nihar Mahajan - 6 years, 2 months ago

Log in to reply

Yeah @Nihar Mahajan it is. But don't you think it would be better if we left same or similar problems as such and don't give links to the others directly, so that one may not simply see the answer and enter it in the other problem. We can't stop same problems being posted more than once, but we can let less and less people see all of them. That's my thinking. Also, Sir Lin said that as of now he is allowing same problems to be posted multiple times, because one might not know if it has been posted earlier or not. Hope you agree!

Satvik Golechha - 6 years, 1 month ago

Log in to reply

Sorry , I didn't know about it. will take care in future. :)

Nihar Mahajan - 6 years, 1 month ago

Are u the one who sent me friend request on fb

Tanishq Varshney - 6 years, 2 months ago

Log in to reply

Yeah!!! Accept it ¨ \ddot\smile

Nihar Mahajan - 6 years, 2 months ago

Log in to reply

@Nihar Mahajan Done!! ¨ \ddot \smile

Tanishq Varshney - 6 years, 2 months ago
Omer Raza
Apr 10, 2015

Well looking it through a binary perspective,it,s seen tht since the powers double from 1 to 2 to 4 and so on to 32,we will get all possible combinations of powers of 2 below 64 in the range repeated only once.For instance consider this: 1(2+1)(2^2+1)(2^4+1) for now on ..We get 2^0 i.e 1 frm seq and by observing we see tht 2power 1 ,2,3,4,5 and 6 are all possible and tht they occur 1 time only. we get this seq 2^0+2^1+2^2+2^3+2^4+2^5+2^6+2^7 as this answer..This is only possible however if consecutive powers increase by TWICE (increasing order) and hence for for abv seq we get 2^0+....2^63 +1(this is at the end) now using geometric formula we have(2^64-1)/2-1 +1=2^64-1+1=2^64 and voila 64,s the answer

0 pending reports

×

Problem Loading...

Note Loading...

Set Loading...