True or False?
There exists a continuous function f : R → R such that for all x ∈ R , f ( f ( x ) ) = cos x .
This section requires Javascript.
You are seeing this because something didn't load right. We suggest you, (a) try
refreshing the page, (b) enabling javascript if it is disabled on your browser and,
finally, (c)
loading the
non-javascript version of this page
. We're sorry about the hassle.
Can you explain why cos f ( x 0 ) = x 0 ? I thought all we had was cos x 0 = x 0 , and it's not clear to me why f ( x 0 ) = x 0 too.
Log in to reply
Happy with f ( cos x ) = f ( f ( f ( x ) ) ) = cos ( f ( x ) ) ? Then f ( x 0 ) = f ( cos x 0 ) = cos ( f ( x 0 ) ) , and so f ( x 0 ) is a solution of cos y = y , and hence f ( x 0 ) = x 0 .
If any function F : A → A is such that F ∘ F has a unique fixed point α , then α is the unique fixed point of F .
Proof :
Since α = F ( F ( α ) ) , we have F ( α ) = F ( F ( F ( α ) ) ) . Thus F ( α ) is a fixed point of F ∘ F , and so F ( α ) = α , so α is a fixed point of F .
If β is a fixed point of F , then F ( F ( β ) ) = F ( β ) = β , and so β is a fixed point of F ∘ F , and hence β = α .
A generalisation of this technique is part of the proof that sufficiently well-behaved differential equations have unique solutions. The equation y ′ ( x ) = f ( x , y ) y ( 0 ) = a is equivalent to the integral equation y ( x ) = I [ y ] ( x ) = a + ∫ 0 x f ( u , y ( u ) ) d u Under suitable conditions on the function f , the operator I is such that some n -fold composite I ∘ I ∘ ⋯ ∘ I is a contraction mapping on C [ 0 , X ] , and hence has a unique fixed point. This unique fixed point is then the unique fixed point of I , and hence the unique solution of the differential equation on the interval [ 0 , X ] .
Note that f ( f ( 0 ) ) = 1 , f ( f ( 2 π ) ) = 0 and since f ( f ( f ( x ) ) ) = f ( cos x ) ⟹ cos ( f ( x ) ) = f ( cos x )
Now since cos x is a bounded function and is decreasing or increasing as per the choice of intervals f must be so.
Now if we take for granted that f is decreasing then , 2 π > 0 ⟹ f ( 2 π ) < f ( 0 ) ⟹ f ( f ( 2 π ) ) > f ( f ( 0 ) ) ⟹ 0 > 1 which is absurd.
Again if f would have been increasing then, 2 π > 0 ⟹ f ( 2 π ) > f ( 0 ) ⟹ f ( f ( 2 π ) ) > f ( f ( 0 ) ) ⟹ 0 > 1 which is again a contradiction .
Thus there exists no such function.
Why must the function be increasing in the (restricted) domain? Why can't it bounce up and down?
Log in to reply
Since the function is continuous & non-constant so if it bounces up and down, the entire graph can be subdivided into intervals where the function is either increasing or decreasing. But it is neither increasing nor decreasing as I showed for ∀ x
Log in to reply
No, you needed "If f is decreasing in the entire region from 0 to 2 π ", since you applied it at the comparison at the points 0 , 2 π .
I do not see how your solution applies to "If f is decreasing in the region 0 to a , increasing in the region from a to b , decreasing in the region from b to c , ...". In particular, it could be decreasing from 0 to 1, increasing from 1 to 1.1, decreasing from 1 to 2 π , and we still have f ( 2 π ) > f ( 0 ) (because the increasing region had a huge increase).
Log in to reply
@Calvin Lin – Okk, So how can we improve this solution ?
Log in to reply
@Aditya Narayan Sharma – I don't think there is an easy fix to this approach. But I've not thought about it much.
Log in to reply
@Calvin Lin – Ah, Mark Henning's solution includes an explanation for why the function is injective and hence strictly increasing/decreasing in the region we care about.
You can use that and help patch up your solution.
I have thought in this way.I m not sure whether I m right or wrong.
f ( f ( x ) ) = c o s x . Here f ( x ) has domain in R and range is also R .So, f ( f ( x ) ) has domain which is the range of f ( x ) i.e. R .Now range of f ( f ( x ) ) has range in R .But it is equal to c o s x which is bounded between [ − 1 , 1 ] .So it contradicts.
That's why, there is no such function.
Problem Loading...
Note Loading...
Set Loading...
Let x 0 be the unique solution. of cos x = x . Since f ( cos x ) = f ( f ( f ( x ) ) ) = cos ( f ( x ) ) , we see that f ( x 0 ) = cos ( f ( x 0 ) ) , and so f ( x 0 ) = x 0 .
If 0 ≤ x , y ≤ 2 1 π and f ( x ) = f ( y ) , then cos x = f ( f ( x ) ) = f ( f ( y ) ) = cos y , and hence x = y . Thus f is injective on [ 0 , 2 1 π ] . By determined use of the Intermediate Value Theorem, this means that f is either strictly increasing or strictly decreasing on [ 0 , 2 1 π ] . This means that there will be an interval I around x 0 so that 0 ≤ f ( x ) ≤ 2 1 π for all x ∈ I , which implies that f ∘ f = cos is increasing on I , which is not the case.
Thus no continuous function f exists with f ∘ f = cos .