Where's Number One?

Algebra Level 5

{ a 2 + b 2 + c 2 = 26 a 3 + b 3 + c 3 = 129 a 4 + b 4 + c 4 = 650 \begin{cases} {a^2 + b^2 + c^2= 26} \\ {a^3 + b^3 + c^3 = -129} \\ {a^4 + b^4 + c^4 = 650} \\ \end{cases}

Given that a , b , c a,b,c are complex numbers that satisfy the system of equations above, and that their sum is an integer. Find the last three digits of a 6 + b 6 + c 6 a^6 + b^6 + c^6 .


The answer is 565.

This section requires Javascript.
You are seeing this because something didn't load right. We suggest you, (a) try refreshing the page, (b) enabling javascript if it is disabled on your browser and, finally, (c) loading the non-javascript version of this page . We're sorry about the hassle.

2 solutions

Chew-Seong Cheong
Dec 27, 2014

Let S 1 = a + b + c S_1= a+b+c , S 2 = a b + b c + c a S_2 = ab+bc+ca , S 3 = a b c S_3 = abc and P n = a n + b n + c n P_n = a^n+b^n+c^n , where n = 1 , 2 , 3 n = 1,2,3 .... Using Newton's Sums method, we have:

{ P 1 = S 1 P 2 = S 1 2 2 S 2 = 26 . . . ( 1 ) P 3 = 26 S 1 S 1 S 2 + 3 S 3 = 129 . . . ( 2 ) P 4 = 129 S 1 26 S 2 + S 1 S 3 = 650 . . . ( 3 ) \begin {cases} P1 = S_1 & & \\ P_2 = S_1^2 - 2S_2 & = 26 &...(1) \\ P_3 = 26S_1 - S_1S_2 + 3S_3 & = -129 & ...(2) \\ P_4 = -129S_1 - 26S_2 + S_1S_3 & = 650 &...(3) \end {cases}

Eqn 2 × S 1 \times\ S_1 - Eqn 3 × 3 \times 3 :

{ 26 S 1 2 S 1 2 S 2 + 3 S 1 S 3 = 129 S 1 387 S 1 78 S 2 + 3 S 1 S 3 = 1950 \begin {cases} 26S_1^2 - S_1^2S_2 + 3S_1S_3 & = -129S_1 \\ -387S_1 - 78S_2 + 3S_1S_3 & = 1950 \end {cases}

26 S 1 2 + ( 78 S 1 2 ) S 2 + 516 S 1 = 1950 . . . ( 4 ) \Rightarrow 26S_1^2 +(78-S_1^2)S_2 + 516S_1 = - 1950\quad ...(4)

From eqn 1, we have 2 S 2 = S 1 2 26 2S_2 = S_1^2-26 . Substituting this in eqn 4 × 2 \times 2 :

52 S 1 2 + ( 78 S 1 2 ) ( S 1 2 26 ) + 1032 S 1 = 3900 \Rightarrow 52S_1^2 +(78-S_1^2)(S_1^2-26) + 1032S_1 = - 3900

52 S 1 2 + ( S 1 4 + 104 S 1 2 2028 ) + 1032 S 1 = 3900 \quad 52S_1^2 +(-S_1^4+104S_1^2-2028)+ 1032S_1 = - 3900

S 1 4 + ( 52 + 104 ) S 1 2 + 1032 S 1 2028 + 3900 = 0 \quad -S_1^4 + (52+104)S_1^2 + 1032S_1 -2028 + 3900 = 0

S 1 4 156 S 1 2 1032 S 1 1872 = 0 \quad S_1^4 - 156S_1^2 - 1032S_1 -1872 = 0

( S 1 + 6 ) ( S 1 3 6 S 1 2 120 S 1 312 ) = 0 \quad (S_1+6)(S_1^3 - 6S_1^2 - 120S_1 -312) = 0

S 1 = 6 S 2 = 5 S 3 = 1 \Rightarrow S_1 = -6\quad \Rightarrow S_2 = 5\quad \Rightarrow S_3 = -1

Now we continue to find P 5 P_5 and P 6 P_6 .

P 5 = a 5 + b 5 + c 5 P_5 = a^5+b^5+c^5

= 650 ( S 1 ) + 129 ( S 2 ) + 26 ( S 3 ) \quad \space \space = 650(S_1) + 129(S_2) + 26(S_3)

= 650 ( 6 ) + 129 ( 5 ) + 26 ( 1 ) = 3900 + 645 26 = 3281 \quad \space \space = 650(-6) + 129(5) + 26(-1) = -3900+645 -26 = -3281

P 6 = a 6 + b 6 + c 6 P_6 = a^6+b^6+c^6

= 3281 ( 6 ) 650 ( 5 ) + 129 ( 1 ) = 19686 3250 + 129 = 16565 \quad \space \space = -3281(-6) - 650(5) + 129(-1) = 19686-3250+129 = 16565

Therefore, the required answer a 6 + b 6 + c 6 ( m o d 1000 ) 16565 ( m o d 1000 ) 565 ( m o d 1000 ) a^6+b^6+c^6 \pmod {1000} \equiv 16565 \pmod {1000} \equiv \boxed {565} \pmod {1000}

Sir actually I made this problem yesterday when you told me that "Newton Formula"

But how did you solve S 1 4 156 S 1 2 1032 S 1 1872 = 0 \quad S_1^4 - 156S_1^2 - 1032S_1 -1872 = 0

Mehul Chaturvedi - 6 years, 5 months ago

Log in to reply

Trial and error. Mehul, I think I have seen this question before. I couldn't solve it them. It should be level 5.

Chew-Seong Cheong - 6 years, 5 months ago

Over rated!!

Jai Gupta - 6 years, 5 months ago

( 3 ( E q 3 ) ( E q 1 ) 3 ) / 2 = a 6 + b 6 + c 6 (3*(Eq 3) -(Eq 1)^3 )/2 = a^6+b^6+c^6 And this gives me 562 as answer

Mandar Belambe - 6 years, 5 months ago

Log in to reply

But is 3 ( a 4 + b 4 + c 4 ) ( a 2 + b 2 + c 2 ) 3 2 = a 6 + b 6 + c 6 \dfrac {3(a^4+b^4+c^4) -(a^2+b^2+c^2)^3} {2} = a^6+b^6+c^6 ?

Chew-Seong Cheong - 6 years, 5 months ago

Log in to reply

sorry Chew-Seong Cheong, ( 3 P 4 P 2 P 2 3 ) / 2 = P 6 (3*P_4*P_2-P_2^3)/2=P6

Mandar Belambe - 6 years, 5 months ago

Log in to reply

@Mandar Belambe No, P 6 = S 1 P 5 S 2 P 4 + S 3 P 3 P_6 = S_1P_5-S_2P_4+S_3P3 . For n > 3 n>3 , P n = S 1 P n 1 S 2 P n 2 + S 3 P n 3 P_n = S_1P_{n-1}-S_2P_{n-2}+S_3P_{n-3} .

Chew-Seong Cheong - 6 years, 5 months ago

Sir I used the technique shared by Aditya raut in his note - Bashing unavailable , there it is given

t n = t n 1 + 1 2 t n 2 + 1 6 t n 3 t_{n} = t_{n - 1} + \dfrac{1}{2}t_{n - 2} + \dfrac{1}{6}t_{n - 3}

t 5 = 650 + 1 2 . 129 + 1 6 . 26 = 3539 6 t_{5} = 650 + \dfrac{1}{2} . -129 + \dfrac{1}{6}.26 = \dfrac{3539}{6}

t 6 = 3539 6 + 1 2 . 650 + 1 6 . 129 = 2680 3 t_{6} = \dfrac{3539}{6} + \dfrac{1}{2}.650 + \dfrac{1}{6}. -129 = \dfrac{2680}{3} ???

U Z - 6 years, 5 months ago

Log in to reply

its the case when a+b+c=1 & a^2+b^2+c^2=2 & a^3+b^3+c^3=3 because whenever reducing the formula he used the case a+b+c=1...

Vighnesh Raut - 6 years, 5 months ago

By my solution ( a + b + c ) = 0 (a+b+c)=0 . But you assumed this sum is not equal to 0. My answer is P 6 = 27577 P6=-27577

Altan-Ulzii Chuluun - 5 years, 9 months ago

Log in to reply

I don't think my answer is wrong. I didn't assume any value for a + b + c a+b+c . It was worked out to be 6 -6 as above. Why must you assume it to be 0 0 ?

I have taken a look at your solution, you are assuming a + b + c = k + 0 i a+b+c = k +0i . I think it should work. But it is very tedious and you may have made mistake somewhere. I am quite sure a + b + c = 6 a+b+c = -6 .

Chew-Seong Cheong - 5 years, 9 months ago

Log in to reply

But you multiplied equation 2 by (a+b+c) in beginning of your solution. I think your answer is correct.

Altan-Ulzii Chuluun - 5 years, 9 months ago

Log in to reply

@Altan-Ulzii Chuluun On second thought your method is similar to Newton sums method which I used here. As far as I know there are only two methods. One is Newton sums used here. The other I don't know. Maybe it is as explained by Megh Choksi below. So far, Newton sums give me the right answers to these type of problems, though it could be tedious. But I use an Excel spreadsheet to do the computation. It is very easy. Altan, you just need to learn the method and you will be able to solve the problems.

Chew-Seong Cheong - 5 years, 9 months ago

Dear Mr Cheong, I have sent you my solution to your e-mail. Please review it and give a feedback.

Altan-Ulzii Chuluun - 5 years, 9 months ago

Same way.....

Dev Sharma - 5 years, 7 months ago

The subscript for P that is three lines up from the bottom should be a 6 not a 5

Bob Kadylo - 5 years, 5 months ago

Log in to reply

Thanks Bob. I have changed it. I probably cut-and-pasted too fast without checking.

Chew-Seong Cheong - 5 years, 5 months ago

I have changed again. Is it done?

Chew-Seong Cheong - 5 years, 5 months ago

Log in to reply

Now the solution is PERFECT !!

Bob Kadylo - 5 years, 5 months ago

Log in to reply

@Bob Kadylo Just now, I was in a hurry to go out with wife to do some shopping and forgot to click submit. Nice knowing you.

Chew-Seong Cheong - 5 years, 5 months ago
Andreas Wendler
Dec 4, 2015

Why performing and therefore repeating well known algorithms in time expanding manner when it is possible to apply mathsoftware for example XMaxima? " solve([a^2+b^2+c^2=26,a^3+b^3+c^3=-129,a^4+b^4+c^4=650],[a,b,c]); " and final calculation of the expression wished will then deliver the solution faster with much higher efficiency!

And so you even have time for visiting the christmas market or doing similar things. ;-)

0 pending reports

×

Problem Loading...

Note Loading...

Set Loading...