2 × h → 0 lim h 2 ∫ 1 1 + h x x d x − ∫ 1 − h 1 x x d x = ?
This section requires Javascript.
You are seeing this because something didn't load right. We suggest you, (a) try
refreshing the page, (b) enabling javascript if it is disabled on your browser and,
finally, (c)
loading the
non-javascript version of this page
. We're sorry about the hassle.
I got 2 but let me ask something on allplying l hospital the second part becomes positive as it is upper function minus lower so answer is only 0 . @ CANNOT BE THE ANSWER.
Log in to reply
There are three minus so the upper part is still negative
a good problem .
instead of using L'Hôpital's rule second time, we can directly see that in the second line it is the derivative of x^x at x=1 which is one and then multiply by as given in the question gives the answer.
Using asymptotic balancing of the limit it turns out that the limits goes to one without solving then 2*1=2
i have the same solution
Does the second line have a minus 2 at the numerator? Or not (1+h) ^(1+h)+(1-h)^(1-h)=2 and 2/0 have a answer for infinity. My real problem is how the first line's numerator differentiate?
Log in to reply
Please read up fundamental theorem of calculus , it's explained there.
Why can you use hopital a second time? Doesnt the limite tend to 2/0 so infinite?
Oh! The same one.
d ( x ) d ( x x ) = x x , so used again L'Hospital is more single.
Log in to reply
Not true. derivative of x x is x x ( ln x + 1 ) . Proof:
Let y = x x ⇒ ln y = x ln x , differentiate with respect to x
y 1 ⋅ d x d y = x x + ln x ⋅ 1
⇒ d x d y = y ⋅ ( ln x + 1 ) = x x ( ln x + 1 )
Log in to reply
What happens if x=0?
The two integrals on top are the areas of two thin trapezoids, width h and height difference approaching h f'(1) where f(x) = x^x.
But f'(x) = (x^x)(1 + ln x), so f'(1) = 1, and this area difference is that of an h by h square.
Thus the limit is 1 and the answer is 2.
Yup! That's the geometric intuition.
The solution that I have in mind was "derivative via first principle", but yours works too!
A general approach can be understood as follows. Let x x = f ( x ) , and let F be a primitive function of f ; that is, F ′ ( x ) = f ( x ) . Consider the Taylor series for F ( x ) around x = 1 : F ( 1 + h ) = F ( 1 ) + f ( 1 ) h + 2 1 f ′ ( 1 ) h 2 + O ( h 3 ) .
Then the requested limit is lim h → 0 2 × h 2 ( F ( 1 + h ) − F ( 1 ) ) − ( F ( 1 ) − F ( 1 − h ) ) . Using the Taylor series, the part under the limit rewrites into 2 f ′ ( 1 ) + O ( h ) . Hence, the requested limit equals 2 f ′ ( 1 ) .
For f ( x ) = x x , we have f ′ ( x ) = x x ( 1 + ln x ) , which can be obtained by rewriting x x = e x ln x .
Thus, the requested limit equals 2 × 1 1 ( 1 + ln 1 ) = 2 .
I have done it using l hopitals rule and newton leibinz formula plz tell me if we can use newton Leibniz formula here or not although my answer came correct by using it
yes, just read the other solutions.
Problem Loading...
Note Loading...
Set Loading...
The numerator and denominator both tend to 0 so we can use L'Hôpital's rule.
L = 2 h → 0 lim h 2 1 ( ∫ 1 1 + h x x d x − ∫ 1 − h 1 x x d x ) = h → 0 lim h ( 1 + h ) ( 1 + h ) − ( 1 − h ) ( 1 − h ) = h → 0 lim ( 1 + h ) ( 1 + h ) ( ln ( 1 + h ) + 1 ) + ( 1 − h ) ( 1 − h ) ( ln ( 1 − h ) + 1 ) = 2