Let x ∈ R + such that { x } , [ x ] , x are in a geometric progression. What is the common ratio of the G.P. ?
Notations: [ x ] denotes the greatest integer less than x while { x } is defined to be x − [ x ] . You may refer to the Wikipedia link for more information about these notations.
This section requires Javascript.
You are seeing this because something didn't load right. We suggest you, (a) try
refreshing the page, (b) enabling javascript if it is disabled on your browser and,
finally, (c)
loading the
non-javascript version of this page
. We're sorry about the hassle.
Note: We do not have a true "quadratic" equation, because [ x ] is not a constant. As such, we cannot blindly apply the quadratic formula. Can you explain how to solve that equation properly?
Also, if you are applying the quadratic formula, you should explain why the negative root is ignored.
Log in to reply
x ∈ R + so negative root rejected.
Log in to reply
The question is, how do you know that there are no further solutions? Even though it "looks like" a quadratic equation, that does not mean that it only has 2 solutions. For example, the equation x 2 − ⌊ x ⌋ x = 1 has infinitely many solutions.
Log in to reply
@Calvin Lin – Note that ' x ' may vary but [ x ] x can be constant. In your quadratic we cannot apply quadratic formula because it would become more complicated. (no common factor comes out). Quadratic formula helps sometimes(like in original problem) if not then go with I-F method.
Log in to reply
@Krishna Sharma – Right. So the point is "how do you know that there are no further solutions, other than the class that you listed?"
Furthermore, Is every value of 2 n + n 5 a solution? E.g. with n = 2 , we get x = 3 . 2 3 6 … , and 0 . 2 3 6 , 3 , 3 . 2 3 6 is not a geometric progression, so it doesn't satisfy the original condition in the question. How was this extraneous solution introduced?
Log in to reply
@Calvin Lin – Clearing everything
Q1:- How can you apply quadratic formula when [x] is variable?
A:- yes, quadratic formula can be applied if you are not satisfied divide the quadratic by [ x ] 2 then put [ x ] x = t .
Q2 :- How can you say there is only one solution of the problem? (x= 0 not included)
A:- let x = 2 k ( 1 + 5 ) where k ∈ Z
We will solve [ x ] x = ϕ
Put k= 1 we will get x = ϕ (only solution)
Put k= 2 we will get [ x ] x = 3 2 ϕ which would not satisfy,
As you go on substituting 'k' the difference of numerator and denominator of coefficient of ϕ will go on increasing hence you can say there is only 1 solution.
I hope this clarification is enough.
Log in to reply
@Krishna Sharma – Great! Using the approach of t = ⌊ x ⌋ x was what I was thinking of. We can then solve it as a quadratic equation, and are only interested in t > 0 . This give us t = ϕ as the solution.
We then have to verify that there is an x value which yields this corresponding t value. In this case, setting x = ϕ , we get ⌊ x ⌋ = 1 and thus t = ϕ .
Note that interestingly, there are no other solutions. Because, if ⌊ x ⌋ x = n ≥ 2 , then we must have x = n ϕ > n + 1 . But this would contradict ⌊ x ⌋ = n .
Can you add these to your solution for completeness?
Sir if u check [x] is. Natural no.. Hence its logically correct we know some part of its v gud sold..or u can check mine
Log in to reply
The fact that ⌊ x ⌋ is a natural number doesn't matter.
We are not guaranteed that there are only solutions which are "derived" from the quadratic equation. Generally, such problems must be solved in a slightly different way, to ensure that we have found all solutions. How do you know that no other solutions exist?
For example, he should also have found the solution x = 0 , and then rejected it because it is not out of range.
Log in to reply
@Calvin Lin – Sir, then please explain the actual way of solving these type of pseudo quadratic..
Can you explain me the very first step?
Log in to reply
Well they are in G.P so the product of the first and the third is equal to the square of the second. In the second step we write fractionalpart(x)=x-floor(x)
Golden Ratio Rocks!!!
Let {x} = a & [x]=z ==>x = z+a From gp we can say z/a =z+a/z=r= common ratio
So( 1/r= a/z)
Let's take r = z+a/z. ( squaring both side ) r^2=(z+a)^2/r^2 and solve and incest r every where inplace of z and a then u will get a equation of degree four r^4 - r^2 - 2r. - 1=0 solve equation by farari method or interpretation of newtonraphanson method you will get only one R+ no that is 1.61803 like golden ratio if u notice like follow me if u like
Note that the quartic could be factorized as ( r 2 − r − 1 ) ( r 2 + r + 1 ) = 0 , which is why it gives us 1 positive root, 1 negative root and 2 complex roots.
Log in to reply
You are correct but can we .can't take those value which r out of our interval and complex is out of question initial values restrictions
Can u tell me m I correct while solving it in this way
Problem Loading...
Note Loading...
Set Loading...
As terms are in G.P. we can write
[ x ] 2 = x { x }
[ x ] 2 = x 2 − x [ x ]
x 2 − x [ x ] − [ x ] 2 = 0
Divide the equation by [ x ] 2
Then put [ x ] x = t
t 2 − t − 1 = 0
From here we get
t = 2 1 + 5
Negative root rejected as x ∈ R +
r = [ x ] x = 2 1 + 5
Note that only solution to this equation is
x = 2 1 + 5
Because as you put x = n ϕ , n > 1 , the floor function would yield a value greater than 'n' hence we can say there is only 1 non - zero solution to the equation.