There exist positive integers A , B , C , D , E , F such that p = 1 ∑ n cot 6 ( 2 n + 1 p π ) = F 1 n ( 2 n − 1 ) ( A n 4 + B n 3 + C n 2 − D n + E ) for all positive integers n , where F is as small as possible.
What is A + B + C + D + E + F ?
Bonus: Use this result to prove that p = 1 ∑ ∞ p 6 1 = 9 4 5 1 π 6 .
This section requires Javascript.
You are seeing this because something didn't load right. We suggest you, (a) try
refreshing the page, (b) enabling javascript if it is disabled on your browser and,
finally, (c)
loading the
non-javascript version of this page
. We're sorry about the hassle.
Nice problem and nice solution. It reminds me of a problem that I wrote. :)
Log in to reply
You can use the formula for ∑ p = 1 n cot 2 2 n + 1 p π for an elementary evaluation, together with estimate of the rate of convergence, of ζ ( 2 ) .
I love this problem :))))
Can someone link me to the concepts discussed in this solution, or just say their name
Log in to reply
It starts with complex number theory and, in particular, de Moivre's Theorem, to define the polynomial F n . It then uses ideas about roots of polynomials, in particular Vieta's formulae, to gain information about the roots of F n and, in particular, so find the values of ∑ p = 1 n cot 2 k 2 n + 1 p π for k = 1 , 2 , 3 .
The reason why I posed the question is that these techniques give us an elementary method of evaluating the infinite sums p = 1 ∑ ∞ p − 2 = 6 1 π 2 p = 1 ∑ ∞ p − 4 = 9 0 1 π 4 p = 1 ∑ ∞ p − 6 = 9 4 5 1 π 6 The bonus part of the question proved the last one of these; the first two are handled using the inequality sin x < x < tan x in just the same way.
My skills do not run this deep. This problem was so far beyond me that I knew I would have to approach it more like a detective than a mathematician.
First I directly evaluated the first 6 terms on my calculator: 2 7 1 , 5 3 4 , 7 5 6 3 , 2 7 1 1 6 9 2 , 1 5 7 5 , 4 5 1 0
The common denominator is 945. That's just like the bonus. Let's assume the continued terms are either integers or don't require any other factors in their denominators. OK then F = 9 4 5
Now to tackle the polynomial. I have 6 terms but I only need 5 for a fourth-degree polynomial. Good. I can check my result with it.
2 7 1 = 9 4 5 1 ( 1 ) ( 1 ) ( 3 5 )
5 3 4 = 9 4 5 1 ( 2 ) ( 3 ) ( 1 0 7 1 )
7 5 6 3 = 9 4 5 1 ( 3 ) ( 5 ) ( 5 0 6 7 )
2 7 1 1 6 9 2 = 9 4 5 1 ( 4 ) ( 7 ) ( 1 4 6 1 5 )
1 5 7 5 = 9 4 5 1 ( 5 ) ( 9 ) ( 3 3 0 7 5 )
4 5 1 0 = 9 4 5 1 ( 6 ) ( 1 1 ) ( 6 4 5 7 5 )
I used my calculator to fit a polynomial to the first 5 terms and it nicely fit the 6th. Looking good.
The polynomial is 3 2 x 4 + 1 1 2 x 3 + 8 x 2 − 2 5 2 x + 1 3 5
The x term is the only negative! Another clue that I am on the right track.
Then the moment of truth: 3 2 + 1 1 2 + 8 + 2 5 2 + 1 3 5 + 9 4 5 = 1 4 8 4
Try it and... Advanced Problem #5, you are MINE!
F = 945 would be an excellent guess because of the bonus problem posted.
Log in to reply
Given that the answer is true, finding the values of F A , F B , F C , F D and F E is a matter of solving a 5 × 5 matrix equation. Given the bonus part, it is indeed a reasonable first guess to suppose that the solutions to the matrix equation are all rationals with denominator F = 9 4 5
Log in to reply
9 4 5 = 3 3 ⋅ 5 ⋅ 7 is a number that actually crops up in other places, but why F should be 945 in this problem isn't immediately or even intuititvely obvious. It takes an analysis like yours to bring that out.
Log in to reply
@Michael Mendrin – I agree. without the clue that the value of ζ ( 6 ) is relevant to this question, the reason why F = 9 4 5 is not at all obvious.
Log in to reply
@Mark Hennings – I might have still guessed F=945 since it is the common denominator of the terms I had. That terms 5 and 6 are whole numbers makes me suspect all of the rest are as well.
As I said, I was just making my best guess.
Log in to reply
@Jeremy Galvagni – I just wonder where else we could uncover mathematical truths just by "detective experimentation" that you have done? Kind of like doing mathematics in the Thomas Edison way.
Log in to reply
@Michael Mendrin – It isn't uncommon. Follow a numerical pattern until you notice some kind of formula. Then try to prove the formula. It happens to me a lot with probability.
Important note: In this case I proved nothing, I just got the right number.
Awesome solution!
Good solve. I guess, approaching this problem more like a math calculation than a rigorous proof has proved helpful.
Did more or less the same - guessed F, evaluated the sum for n=1,2,...,5 and solved 5x5 system with wolfram. What can you do when math gets hard...
Problem Loading...
Note Loading...
Set Loading...
Note that sin ( 2 n + 1 ) x = I m ( ( cos x + i sin x ) 2 n + 1 ) = m = 0 ∑ n ( − 1 ) m ( 2 m + 1 2 n + 1 ) cos 2 n − 2 m x sin 2 m + 1 x = sin 2 n + 1 x F n ( cot 2 x ) where F n ( X ) is the degree n polynomial F n ( X ) = m = 0 ∑ n ( − 1 ) m ( 2 m + 1 2 n + 1 ) X n − m = ( 1 2 n + 1 ) X n − ( 3 2 n + 1 ) X n − 1 + ( 5 2 n + 1 ) X n − 2 + ⋯ Note that the zeros of F n ( X ) are the values of cot 2 x where sin ( 2 n + 1 ) x = 0 but sin x = 0 , and so F n ( X ) has n distinct real zeros, namely u p = cot 2 ( 2 n + 1 p π ) p = 1 , 2 , . . . , n Thus we know that e 1 = p = 1 ∑ n u p e 2 = 1 ≤ p < q ≤ n ∑ u p u q e 3 = 1 ≤ p < q < r ≤ n ∑ u p u q u r = ( 1 2 n + 1 ) − 1 ( 3 2 n + 1 ) = 3 1 n ( 2 n − 1 ) = ( 1 2 n + 1 ) − 1 ( 5 2 n + 1 ) = 3 0 1 n ( n − 1 ) ( 2 n − 1 ) ( 2 n − 3 ) = ( 1 2 n + 1 ) − 1 ( 7 2 n + 1 ) = 6 3 0 1 n ( n − 1 ) ( n − 2 ) ( 2 n − 1 ) ( 2 n − 3 ) ( 2 n − 5 ) and hence p = 1 ∑ n cot 2 ( 2 n + 1 p π ) p = 1 ∑ n cot 4 ( 2 n + 1 p π ) p = 1 ∑ n cot 6 ( 2 n + 1 p π ) = e 1 = 3 1 n ( 2 n − 1 ) = e 1 2 − 2 e 2 = 4 5 1 n ( 2 n − 1 ) ( 4 n 2 + 1 0 n − 9 ) = e 1 3 − 3 e 1 e 2 + 3 e 3 = 9 4 5 1 n ( 2 n − 1 ) ( 3 2 n 4 + 1 1 2 n 3 + 8 n 2 − 2 5 2 n + 1 3 5 ) which makes the answer 3 2 + 1 1 2 + 8 + 2 5 2 + 1 3 5 + 9 4 5 = 1 4 8 4 .
If 0 < x < 2 1 π then sin x < x < tan x , and hence cot x < x − 1 < c o s e c x , so that cot 6 x < x − 6 < c o s e c 6 x = ( cot 2 x + 1 ) 3 = cot 6 x + 3 cot 4 x + 3 cot 2 x + 1 and hence p = 1 ∑ n cot 6 ( 2 n + 1 p π ) < π 6 ( 2 n + 1 ) 6 p = 1 ∑ n p 6 1 < p = 1 ∑ n [ cot 2 ( 2 n + 1 p π ) + 1 ] 3 Since p = 1 ∑ n cot 2 ( 2 n + 1 p π ) ∼ 3 2 n 2 p = 1 ∑ n cot 4 ( 2 n + 1 p π ) ∼ 4 5 8 n 4 p = 1 ∑ n cot 6 ( 2 n + 1 p π ) ∼ 9 4 5 6 4 n 6 as n → ∞ , we easily deduce that n → ∞ lim ( 2 n + 1 ) 6 1 p = 1 ∑ n cot 6 ( 2 n + 1 p π ) = n → ∞ lim ( 2 n + 1 ) 6 1 p = 1 ∑ n [ cot 2 ( 2 n + 1 p π ) + 1 ] 3 = 9 4 5 1 and hence p = 1 ∑ ∞ p 6 1 = 9 4 5 1 π 6