Binary Operations

Calculus Level 5

Define a binary operation a b = a + b + a b a*b = a+b+ab , with a , b a,b are real quantities, where * denotes the symbol of binary operator.

Now this binary operation is associative, commutative and closed under the set of reals.

Denote S = lim n ( 1 1 4 1 9 1 n 2 ) S = \displaystyle \lim_{n \to \infty} \left ( 1 * \frac {1}{4} * \frac {1}{9} * \ldots * \frac {1}{n^2} \right )

Find 100000 S \lfloor 100000S \rfloor .

This is original. Check out my Set


The answer is 267607.

This section requires Javascript.
You are seeing this because something didn't load right. We suggest you, (a) try refreshing the page, (b) enabling javascript if it is disabled on your browser and, finally, (c) loading the non-javascript version of this page . We're sorry about the hassle.

2 solutions

Ronak Agarwal
Mar 19, 2015

Observe that a b = ( a + 1 ) ( b + 1 ) 1 a*b=(a+1)(b+1)-1

And a b c = ( a b ) c = ( ( a + 1 ) ( b + 1 ) 1 ) c = ( ( ( a + 1 ) ( b + 1 ) 1 ) + 1 ) ( c + 1 ) 1 = ( a + 1 ) ( b + 1 ) ( c + 1 ) 1 a*b*c = (a*b)*c = ((a+1)(b+1)-1)*c = \\ (((a+1)(b+1)-1)+1)(c+1)-1 = (a+1)(b+1)(c+1) -1

Hence I am asserting that :

a 1 a 2 a 3 . . . . a n = i = 1 n ( 1 + a i ) 1 \displaystyle { a }_{ 1 }*{ a }_{ 2 }*{ a }_{ 3 }*....*{ a }_{ n }=\prod _{ i=1 }^{ n }{ (1+{ a }_{ i }) } -1

It can be easily proved by induction.

So what the question actually is asking is :

S = i = 1 ( 1 + 1 i 2 ) 1 \displaystyle S = \prod _{ i=1 }^{ \infty }{ (1+\dfrac { 1 }{ { i }^{ 2 } } ) } -1

For calculating this consider the product expansion of s i n ( x ) sin(x) :

sin ( x ) x = n = 1 ( 1 x 2 ( n π ) 2 ) \displaystyle \dfrac{\sin { (x) }}{x} =\prod _{ n=1 }^{ \infty }{ (1-\dfrac { { x }^{ 2 } }{ { (n\pi ) }^{ 2 } } ) }

Put x = i π z x= i \pi z to get :

sin ( i π z ) i π z = n = 1 ( 1 + z 2 n 2 ) \displaystyle \dfrac{\sin { (i\pi z)}}{i\pi z} =\prod _{ n=1 }^{ \infty }{ (1+\dfrac { { z }^{ 2 } }{ { n }^{ 2 } } ) }

Put z = 1 z=1 to get :

sin ( i π ) i π = n = 1 ( 1 + 1 n 2 ) \displaystyle \dfrac{\sin { (i\pi )}}{i\pi } = \prod _{ n=1 }^{ \infty }{ (1+\dfrac { 1 }{ { n }^{ 2 } } ) }

We will be finding sin ( i π ) \sin(i\pi)

Using euler's formula :

e i x = cos ( x ) + i sin ( x ) e^{ix} = \cos(x)+i\sin(x)

Put x -x instead of x x

e i x = cos ( x ) i sin ( x ) e^{-ix} = \cos(x)-i\sin(x)

Add subtract second from first to get :

sin ( x ) = e i x e i x 2 i \displaystyle \sin(x) = \dfrac { { e }^{ ix }-{ e }^{ -ix } }{ 2i }

Put x = i π x=i\pi , to get :

sin ( i π ) = e π e π 2 i \displaystyle \sin(i\pi ) = \dfrac { { e }^{ -\pi }-{ e }^{ \pi } }{ 2i }

sin i π i π = n = 1 ( 1 + 1 n 2 ) = e π e π 2 π \Rightarrow \displaystyle \dfrac { \sin { i\pi } }{ i\pi } =\prod _{ n=1 }^{ \infty }{ (1+\dfrac { 1 }{ { n }^{ 2 } } ) } =\dfrac { { e }^{ \pi }-{ e }^{ -\pi } }{ 2\pi }

Finally we have :

S = e π e π 2 π 1 \displaystyle S = \dfrac { { e }^{ \pi }-{ e }^{ -\pi } }{ 2\pi } -1

First there is binary operations in ncert, then there is this.. ;) Great question man! I fell asleep on my table while doing this. Then I woke up and got the idea, it took me some more time to find the product though.

Raghav Vaidyanathan - 6 years, 2 months ago

Log in to reply

I tell you there was a problem in pre-boards defining this binary operation and the problem was to prove it associative and commutative. How boring it was, I completed that paper in 2 and half hours. In the last half hour I played with that binary operation and found this amazing form. While making this question, I thought of a way to make this interesting, and I used this.

Ronak Agarwal - 6 years, 2 months ago

Truly remarkable!

Richeek Das - 2 years, 5 months ago
Mvs Saketh
Mar 19, 2015

Remarkable problem, and your maths skills regarding summations and integrals is ingenious,

However, i have found a bit of a cheap way to solve this problem, not half as awesome as yours

Simply expanding reveals that what we have to evaluate is

( a + b + c + d . . . ) + ( a b + b c + c d + d e . . . . ) + ( a b c + b c d + d c e . . . ) . . . . . (a+b+c+d...)\quad +\quad (ab+bc+cd+de....)+(abc+bcd+dce...)\quad .....\quad \infty

here a,b,c,d are the reciprocal of squares

now the first sum is simply ζ ( 2 ) \zeta (2)

the second sum (sum over pairs) can be written as

ζ ( 2 ) 2 ζ ( 4 ) 2 \\ \frac { \zeta (2)^{ 2 }-\zeta (4) }{ 2 }

now consider the third sum, it can be seen with ease to be

ζ ( 2 ) ( s 2 ) ζ ( 4 ) ( s 1 ) + ζ ( 6 ) 3 \\ \frac { \zeta (2)({ s }_{ 2 })-\zeta (4){ (s }_{ 1 })+\zeta (6) }{ 3 }

where s n s_{n} represnts the sum taken n tuples at a time

infact in general i found that it can be wriiten as

s n = 1 n ζ ( 2 r ) ( s n r ) ( 1 ) r + 1 s_{n}= \frac { 1 }{ n } \sum { \zeta ({ 2 }^{ r } } )({ s }_{ n-r })(-1)^{ r+1 }

when we want to find the nth sum

though that is useless, as it is hard to sum over this,

However observing the first few terms revealed to me that they are simply

s r = π 2 ( r 1 ) ( 2 r 1 ) ! { s }_{ r }=\frac { \pi ^{ 2(r-1) } }{(2 r-1)! }

Thats it now it is obvious, simply consider the difference of two conjugate exponential series and divide by 'z', and proceed with ease to get answer,

Yes i agree that this method sucks

Kindly can you please elaborate your method, I can't get it , though it seems interesting.

Ronak Agarwal - 6 years, 2 months ago

Log in to reply

Basically, i found the formula for sum taking 'n' of the reciprocal squares at a time, and then substituted , r=2 , r=3 and 4 to see that they were simply following the general rule that i have given at end, (pi raised to some power over odd factorial)

and where do we get reciprocal of odd factorial that as the coefficient, yes

in e^(x)-e^(-x),

Now divide it by 2x, put x=(piz)

then put x=1 and then subtract 1, to remove the first term of series, just like in ur way,

Mvs Saketh - 6 years, 2 months ago

Log in to reply

Oh, I understood, this.

Ronak Agarwal - 6 years, 2 months ago

Log in to reply

@Ronak Agarwal and i think now using this we can find all ζ ( 2 n ) \zeta (2n)

but bro, can you please tell me a good source for calculus, integration in particular,

Or did you wholly discover it by simply innovation ?

Mvs Saketh - 6 years, 2 months ago

Log in to reply

@Mvs Saketh I was about to comment about this only that we can use it for all z e t a ( 2 n ) zeta(2n)

You can ofcourse because in essence it uses the product expansion of sin(x) ( although indirectly) ( watch my method and your method closely).

Ronak Agarwal - 6 years, 2 months ago

Log in to reply

@Ronak Agarwal Indeed it does, and how sad it is that if only this contained ζ ( 2 n + 1 ) \zeta (2n+1) , i would have waited for my noble prize shortly ,

Yes, its the same, except you nicely spotted and factorized +1

Mvs Saketh - 6 years, 2 months ago

Log in to reply

@Mvs Saketh It won't contain ζ ( 2 n + 1 ) \zeta(2n+1) , since it follows from product expansion of s i n ( x ) sin(x) approach

Ronak Agarwal - 6 years, 2 months ago

@Mvs Saketh If not noble prize you would surely get field's prize. :)

Ronak Agarwal - 6 years, 2 months ago

Oh, did the same! But I had a little problem in the last part.

Kartik Sharma - 6 years, 2 months ago

0 pending reports

×

Problem Loading...

Note Loading...

Set Loading...