Define a binary operation a ∗ b = a + b + a b , with a , b are real quantities, where ∗ denotes the symbol of binary operator.
Now this binary operation is associative, commutative and closed under the set of reals.
Denote S = n → ∞ lim ( 1 ∗ 4 1 ∗ 9 1 ∗ … ∗ n 2 1 )
Find ⌊ 1 0 0 0 0 0 S ⌋ .
This section requires Javascript.
You are seeing this because something didn't load right. We suggest you, (a) try
refreshing the page, (b) enabling javascript if it is disabled on your browser and,
finally, (c)
loading the
non-javascript version of this page
. We're sorry about the hassle.
First there is binary operations in ncert, then there is this.. ;) Great question man! I fell asleep on my table while doing this. Then I woke up and got the idea, it took me some more time to find the product though.
Log in to reply
I tell you there was a problem in pre-boards defining this binary operation and the problem was to prove it associative and commutative. How boring it was, I completed that paper in 2 and half hours. In the last half hour I played with that binary operation and found this amazing form. While making this question, I thought of a way to make this interesting, and I used this.
Truly remarkable!
Remarkable problem, and your maths skills regarding summations and integrals is ingenious,
However, i have found a bit of a cheap way to solve this problem, not half as awesome as yours
Simply expanding reveals that what we have to evaluate is
( a + b + c + d . . . ) + ( a b + b c + c d + d e . . . . ) + ( a b c + b c d + d c e . . . ) . . . . . ∞
here a,b,c,d are the reciprocal of squares
now the first sum is simply ζ ( 2 )
the second sum (sum over pairs) can be written as
2 ζ ( 2 ) 2 − ζ ( 4 )
now consider the third sum, it can be seen with ease to be
3 ζ ( 2 ) ( s 2 ) − ζ ( 4 ) ( s 1 ) + ζ ( 6 )
where s n represnts the sum taken n tuples at a time
infact in general i found that it can be wriiten as
s n = n 1 ∑ ζ ( 2 r ) ( s n − r ) ( − 1 ) r + 1
when we want to find the nth sum
though that is useless, as it is hard to sum over this,
However observing the first few terms revealed to me that they are simply
s r = ( 2 r − 1 ) ! π 2 ( r − 1 )
Thats it now it is obvious, simply consider the difference of two conjugate exponential series and divide by 'z', and proceed with ease to get answer,
Yes i agree that this method sucks
Kindly can you please elaborate your method, I can't get it , though it seems interesting.
Log in to reply
Basically, i found the formula for sum taking 'n' of the reciprocal squares at a time, and then substituted , r=2 , r=3 and 4 to see that they were simply following the general rule that i have given at end, (pi raised to some power over odd factorial)
and where do we get reciprocal of odd factorial that as the coefficient, yes
in e^(x)-e^(-x),
Now divide it by 2x, put x=(piz)
then put x=1 and then subtract 1, to remove the first term of series, just like in ur way,
Log in to reply
Oh, I understood, this.
Log in to reply
@Ronak Agarwal – and i think now using this we can find all ζ ( 2 n )
but bro, can you please tell me a good source for calculus, integration in particular,
Or did you wholly discover it by simply innovation ?
Log in to reply
@Mvs Saketh – I was about to comment about this only that we can use it for all z e t a ( 2 n )
You can ofcourse because in essence it uses the product expansion of sin(x) ( although indirectly) ( watch my method and your method closely).
Log in to reply
@Ronak Agarwal – Indeed it does, and how sad it is that if only this contained ζ ( 2 n + 1 ) , i would have waited for my noble prize shortly ,
Yes, its the same, except you nicely spotted and factorized +1
Log in to reply
@Mvs Saketh – It won't contain ζ ( 2 n + 1 ) , since it follows from product expansion of s i n ( x ) approach
@Mvs Saketh – If not noble prize you would surely get field's prize. :)
Oh, did the same! But I had a little problem in the last part.
Problem Loading...
Note Loading...
Set Loading...
Observe that a ∗ b = ( a + 1 ) ( b + 1 ) − 1
And a ∗ b ∗ c = ( a ∗ b ) ∗ c = ( ( a + 1 ) ( b + 1 ) − 1 ) ∗ c = ( ( ( a + 1 ) ( b + 1 ) − 1 ) + 1 ) ( c + 1 ) − 1 = ( a + 1 ) ( b + 1 ) ( c + 1 ) − 1
Hence I am asserting that :
a 1 ∗ a 2 ∗ a 3 ∗ . . . . ∗ a n = i = 1 ∏ n ( 1 + a i ) − 1
It can be easily proved by induction.
So what the question actually is asking is :
S = i = 1 ∏ ∞ ( 1 + i 2 1 ) − 1
For calculating this consider the product expansion of s i n ( x ) :
x sin ( x ) = n = 1 ∏ ∞ ( 1 − ( n π ) 2 x 2 )
Put x = i π z to get :
i π z sin ( i π z ) = n = 1 ∏ ∞ ( 1 + n 2 z 2 )
Put z = 1 to get :
i π sin ( i π ) = n = 1 ∏ ∞ ( 1 + n 2 1 )
We will be finding sin ( i π )
Using euler's formula :
e i x = cos ( x ) + i sin ( x )
Put − x instead of x
e − i x = cos ( x ) − i sin ( x )
Add subtract second from first to get :
sin ( x ) = 2 i e i x − e − i x
Put x = i π , to get :
sin ( i π ) = 2 i e − π − e π
⇒ i π sin i π = n = 1 ∏ ∞ ( 1 + n 2 1 ) = 2 π e π − e − π
Finally we have :
S = 2 π e π − e − π − 1