In 2013, Hospital A delivered
2
0
0
babies and Hospital B delivered
4
0
0
babies. Given that the probability of having a boy and a girl is equal, which hospital has a greater chance of delivering equal number of boys and girls?
This section requires Javascript.
You are seeing this because something didn't load right. We suggest you, (a) try
refreshing the page, (b) enabling javascript if it is disabled on your browser and,
finally, (c)
loading the
non-javascript version of this page
. We're sorry about the hassle.
It does sound counter-intuitive doesn't it? We generally expect probabilities to "even out" in the long run.
A potential good followup question could be "Which hospital has a greater chance that the number of boys delivered differs from the number of girls delivered by less than 20?"
Log in to reply
Exactly, the larger the data set, the more accurately it should show the odds. AKA evening out. Hence why I chose Hospital B.
Log in to reply
There is a big difference between "the odds evening out", and the "probability of exactly that event".
When we say that "the odds even out", what we mean is that it is more likely that 49-51% (or any range around 50%) of the babies born are boys. However, because there are much more specific events, the probability of each event is actually lower. For example, in hospital A, we included having 98, 99, 100, 101, 102 boys (5 events), while in hospital B we included having 196, 197, 198 199, 200, 201, 202, 203, 204 boys (9 events)
We know that the probability of having 2 n children of which n are boys an n are girls is ( n 2 n ) × 0 . 5 n × 0 . 5 n . With stirling approximation of n ! ∼ 2 π n ( e n ) n , we can approximate this probability to be
( 2 π n ( e n ) n ) 2 2 π 2 n ( e 2 n ) 2 n × 0 . 5 n × 0 . 5 n = π n 1
The probability of this specific event decreases as n increases.
.
Log in to reply
@Calvin Lin – Sir, this means that as n approaches infinity, the probability tends to zero?
that is what my views are.
You are correct. I, too, was initially thinking about the Normal Distribution Curve (taking the left side of the bell as extra girls/boys and the right side as the other one) but then, again, I think that comes into effect only if the number is really large eg: 1 million or something. Normal distribution can't be applied in small-ish cases such as 200-400. That is why I went with A - strict simple probability. However I do think that the author takes note of this potential issue in the future and try to make sure that he keeps the numbers low enough not to make a difference (eg: Hospital A has 20 and Hospital B has 35).
Log in to reply
That interpretation is not correct. See the above comment that I just made.
Normal approximations to the binomial distribution happen when n > 5 0 . (of course, this range depends on your limits of acceptable error). With p = 5 0 , the value of n can go much lower.
But more the events, the more would be the Probability of getting equal boys and girls ! Couldn't understand
Log in to reply
The Law of Large: The more people we survey, the more accurate the result. Larger samples are better
That is precisely the point. We are only measuring 1 event, namely the one where there are exactly n boys and exactly n girls. We are not measuring the events where the number of boys and the number of girls are approximately the same. Because we need exactly the same, we only have 1 event, whose probability decreases.
Log in to reply
Ohhh snap. I didn't understand your reply to me but that comment cleared it up for me. You are certainly correct. There are more possible combinations in group of 400 children than in the group of 200 children.
yes thee law of large is suitable when the more people we collect to study more accurate chances to get equality
i think this answer is wrong because if you select any hospital its 1/2 and in each hospital the probability to get the required outcome is 1/2 (it may happen or may not happen ) hence when we select a as our result by bayers therom 1/2.1/2/1/2.1/2+1/2.1/2 and for b its the same thing so the result will be they are eaual
Nice solution same approach.
If there were only 2 deliveries, the probability of equal number of boys and girls would be 1/3 and not 0.5 since there are 3 possible combinations b/w boys and girls. 1 ) both boys 2) both girls 3) both boy and girl.
Log in to reply
wrong. there are 4 combinations: 1. boy and boy 2. girl and girl 3. boy and girl 4. girl and boy
In this case it would be 0.5, as in GG, BB, BG, GB.
Well, its quite simple actually, keeping in mind that the probability of male or female is equal...it does not effect which hospital you choose...but statistically speaking...probability of hospital with double amount of deliveries has a bigger chance of getting a probability of 50percent
The lesser the cases,the lesser the chances of getting he ratio wrong
if there were 2 deliveries, chance of getting equal no of boy & girl would be .33, as this is a combination prob. NOT PERMUTATION. we dont care which order we pick the events. thus, there will be chances like: (2 boy), (2 girl), (1 boy, 1 girl).
Log in to reply
No, you missed (1 girl, 1 boy), we will also see the order.
For me all these arguments are tricky. If probability is no more than probability, having same probability to get same number of boys and girls, the answer for me is that no matter how big is the sample, probability is the same. Another thing is what we get once we "throw the dice".
If boys and girls are born with identical (independent) probability 2 1 , then there are exactly ( n / 2 n ) possible birth orders of boys and girls in a hospital in which n total children are born. (To see this, note that it suffices to determine which children are boys -- all the others must be girls.)
Meanwhile, there are 2 n possible birth orders in total, all of which arise with equal probability.
Thus, the probability that a hospital with n births has an equal number of boys and girls is p ( n ) : = 2 n ( n / 2 n ) .
We can explicitly compute that p ( 2 0 0 ) = 2 0 0 8 6 7 2 5 5 5 3 2 3 7 3 7 8 4 4 4 2 7 4 5 2 6 1 5 4 2 6 4 5 3 2 5 3 1 5 2 7 5 3 7 4 2 2 2 8 4 9 1 0 4 4 1 2 6 7 2 1 1 3 1 8 5 6 4 3 3 2 0 1 2 9 1 0 1 4 5 6 7 5 5 2 2 1 3 4 6 8 5 5 2 0 4 8 4 3 1 3 0 7 3 7 0 9 4 2 6 6 6 7 1 0 5 1 6 5 ≈ 0 . 0 5 6 3 4 8 5 , and p ( 4 0 0 ) = 3 2 2 7 8 1 2 3 4 7 6 0 8 6 3 5 7 3 7 0 6 9 8 9 8 9 6 5 0 0 3 7 6 4 8 4 2 9 1 2 1 3 2 2 4 1 0 3 6 5 2 9 3 9 1 0 3 8 3 2 4 1 9 5 6 7 5 8 0 9 5 2 7 5 2 1 0 5 1 4 9 3 2 8 7 0 5 6 6 9 1 6 0 0 1 7 2 2 8 9 2 9 4 8 7 8 9 6 4 9 6 5 9 3 4 3 6 6 7 2 1 2 8 6 9 0 6 2 5 1 6 9 2 6 8 0 4 1 2 1 6 2 1 9 8 5 0 4 0 0 5 0 2 4 8 3 4 4 6 5 1 3 6 5 6 7 2 6 3 4 7 0 6 0 2 9 3 5 6 1 3 2 4 4 6 9 9 0 4 1 6 5 4 6 5 8 1 4 9 4 8 2 4 7 9 2 0 7 4 4 3 9 8 7 2 0 6 1 6 1 8 9 4 5 5 0 6 0 7 4 6 8 8 3 4 6 7 6 5 ≈ 0 . 0 3 9 8 6 9 3 < p ( 2 0 0 ) .
Alternatively, we can observe that the derivative of p ( n ) is p ′ ( n ) = − 2 − n ( n / 2 n ) ( H n / 2 − H n + lo g ( 2 ) ) , where H k is the k -th harmonic number. As H n / 2 − H n (which is negative) is bounded below by − lo g ( 2 ) , we see that p ′ ( n ) < 0 -- so that p ( n ) is decreasing -- for n ≥ 0 ; whence we must have p ( 2 0 0 ) > p ( 4 0 0 ) .
I have found the new Sonnhard
I think the question needs to be worded differently. I read it very quick and selected the obvious without answering the actual question. Given the staff had to reply several times to clear things up explains a lot. Imo....
You may tempt to give the equal probability of having equal number of boys and girls for both hospitals viz. A and B, as the probability of having a boy and a girl is equal but it differs as the number of possible outcomes increases.
Let me generalize it this way. For example we have 2 babies born. The probability of delivering 1 boy and 1 girl is: a) First boy and second girl OR b) First girl and second boy
So it is: (1/2 * 1/2) + (1/2 * 1/2) = 1/2
Let the number of babies born is 4. Therefore, the probability of delivering 2 boys and 2 girls is a) First boy and second boy and third girl and fourth girl OR
b) First boy and second girl and third boy and fourth girl OR
c) First boy and second girl and third girl and fourth boy OR
d) First girl and second girl and third boy and fourth boy OR
e) First girl and second boy and third girl and fourth boy OR
f) First girl and second boy and third boy and fourth girl OR
So it is : (1/2 * 1/2 * 1/2 * 1/2) + (1/2 * 1/2 * 1/2 * 1/2) + (1/2 * 1/2 * 1/2 * 1/2) + (1/2 * 1/2 * 1/2 * 1/2) + (1/2 * 1/2 * 1/2 * 1/2) + (1/2 * 1/2 * 1/2 * 1/2) = 6/16 = 3/8
i.e, 4 !/(2! * 2!) is the favorable outcome and 2^4 is possible outcome
= 6/16.
So for 200 it will come as (200!/(100! * 100!) / 2^200 and for 400 it will come as (400!/(200! * 200!) / 2^400)
Therefore if the number of babies born are less the probability of having equal boys and equal girls is greater.
Thanks
we dont care if the 1st baby is boy or girl. we dont care the order of babies. so, if there are 4 babies, chance of having equal no of boy,girl would be 1/5.. 5 cases are: (4 boys), (3 boy,1 girl), (2b,2g), (1b,3g), (4g). what u r saying is right when we take the order into account. bt here, we r just concerned about the ultimate result.
Thnx a lot I guess ur thread was the best as it explained the problem in the simplest way.
P(A) = (.5^100)(.5^100) = 0.5^200 P(B) = (.5^200)(.5^200) = 0.5^400 Hence, P(A) > P(B)
I think you've forgotten the combination operation in finding the two probabilities, i.e. P(A) = (200C100)(.5^200) and P(B) = (400C200)(.5^400). It doesn't change the answer, anyway.
Log in to reply
I cancelled it because it's equal 1
Thats how I did it. Simple and pretty.
you can use pascals triangle to solve this and examine the middle term divided by the sum. For 2, its 1 2 1. 2/4=.5; For 4, its 1 4 6 4 1. 6/16=.375; For 6, its 1 6 15 20 15 6 1. 20/64= .3125. So by this logic, f(200) is less than f(100).
Why everyone are so complicated T_T. Hospital A has 1/100 chance of having equally boys and girls while Hospital B has 1/200 chance :. It's very easy :\
How did you get that formula??... I don't understand :/
Because this question is not as easy as you think. :/ :\
Probability tends to more true when the sample space large so , hospital B has greater sample space than hospital A, So hospital B has greater chance.
That is incorrect. It is more likely to be CLOSE to even, but the probability of exactly even goes down. It's a simple binomial distribution problem.
Why we might think that bigger sample is better for getting the same number of boys and girls: we simply expect that all the variations cancel out, but in this specific task, those variations have to cancel out completely, which makes it less probable.
Still, it is true that if we plot the distribution of boys and girls (for every day of the year), we expect that hospital with greater number of kids should have smaller relative difference between boys and girls throughout the year.
Funny how I, without complex A-level maths, managed to solve this using intuition only. I felt that the odds are, realistically, never even. So, the less the number of total births, the less likely it is that there are outstanding uneven numbers of boys and girls. Therefore it is A. Given what was just said though, I did ignore the bit that said the chances were exactly even, because that gave two options as an answer, which of course means by my logic one should probably skip over that detail somewhat
As hospital B has more babies, the chances to have equal number of boys and girls are hardest.
Probability p = favourable cases/Total no. of cases. Here, favourable case is just one, 50% boys and 50% girls. Total cases include: 400 boys: 0 girls, 399 boys: 1 girl.. and so on. So total number of cases are 400 and 200. Therefore, pA = 1/200, pB=1/400
its nothing maths in it just use ur iq. out of 200 babies probability will be more of equal no. of babies than in 400 if u have 2 balls and someone else has 5 balls have more probability of having the balls of same color
If we have 400 babies, there are 401 possible combinations of babies:
--- 0 boy, 400 girls
--- 1 boy, 399 girls
--- 2 boys, 398 girls
..........
--- 400 boys, 0 girls
And in only one case, the numbers are equal(200,200). So, the chance of it happening, for 400 babies, is 1/401.
If the same thinking is applied to the other hospital, we come to a probability of 1/201.
As 1/201>1/401, probability of hospital A is bigger than hospital B.
This is why i think the probability field needs a new Gauss. We tend to over simplify very complex problems and take answers as right that we know are wrong in our gut just because we apply some current formulas and accept the answers without a critical spirit. We are all saying that there is exactly the same probability of having 200 girls + 200 boys or 400 girls and 0 boys which seems right from our blind formula usage but we all know in our gut that this isn't true. There is only one route to 400G + 0B but there are a lot of ways to get to 200G + 200B. Just to end my point, if for 100 years i own a hospital that every year delivers 400 babies i can say that in some of those years i will certainly get 200G + 200B and can also say that will never get a year with 400G + 0B. We all know this is true and we keep saying the probability is the same for both cases.
In hospital B of 400 babies, probability will be half that of hospital A of 200 babies. Thus Hospital A has more chance!
The number of ways to produce n of 2n boys is ( n 2 n ) . By Stirling's formula, this is approximately π n 4 n . Thus the probability of having exactly half boys half girls is π n 4 n / 2 2 n = π n 1 . Thus the greater the number of trials, the more difficult it is to get exactly half.
It is simple as the population size increases the chances if reaching the universal average increases. That is why hospital A with small number of babies has a higher chance of diverting from the universal average and having equal number if boys and girls.
But the task is very specific. Let's say we flip a coin 1 million times today and then tomorrow we flip it only twice. On which day we have greater chance of getting the same number of heads and tails?
Problem Loading...
Note Loading...
Set Loading...
If there were only 2 deliveries, the probability of equal number of boys and girls would be 0.5.
If there were 200 deliveries, then for getting a half probability, we will need 100 and 99 boys and girls before the last one, and its probability will definitely be less than half.
So we get the general case- More the number of deliveries, lesser the chance of equal number of bays and girls. And so is the answer- Hospital A.