On his expedition to South America, Dr. Brilliant discovers a species of exotic butterflies that he names Brilliant Butterflies, and takes a sizable population back to his butterfly conservatory for further study. According to Dr. Brilliant's research, the Brilliant Butterflies come in two different colors: red, the dominant gene, and blue, the recessive gene. Conveniently for research purposes, red butterflies with an allele for blue are noticeably smaller than red butterflies without an allele for blue. Also much to Dr. Brilliant's fascination, a red Brilliant Butterfly will never breed with a blue Brilliant Butterfly (and vice versa).
If Dr. Brilliant's initial population of Brilliant Butterflies was 4 1 large red, 4 1 small red, and 2 1 blue, then the expected portion of blue butterflies out of the whole population will approach b a as time goes on, for two co-prime positive integers a and b . Find a + b .
Assumptions:
All large red butterflies have the genotype RR, all small red butterflies have the genotype Rb, and all blue butterflies have the genotype bb, where red is the dominant color and blue is the recessive color, and breeding will follow the expected probabilities found by a Punnett square.
Because it is a sufficiently large population, the large red butterflies will breed with either another large or small red butterfly at a probability based on the current ratio between large and small red butterflies. The same is true about small red butterflies breeding with large or small red butterflies. Blue butterflies only breed with other blue butterflies.
Butterflies breed only once and then die shortly afterwards. No butterflies breed across a generation.
The fertility and mortality rates of all types of butterflies are proportionally the same.
This section requires Javascript.
You are seeing this because something didn't load right. We suggest you, (a) try
refreshing the page, (b) enabling javascript if it is disabled on your browser and,
finally, (c)
loading the
non-javascript version of this page
. We're sorry about the hassle.
It is obvious that the proportion of heterozygote will steadily decrease, but is it immediately obvious that it tends to zero? "Decreasing" and "tending to zero" are not the same.
Log in to reply
If there are heterozygotes in one generation, the next generation will see an increase in blue butterflies. Can the proportion of blue butterflies reach a limit when the amount of heterozygotes doesn't tend to zero?
Log in to reply
You ask that the limit be "reached", implying that there is a time when it is achieved. That is not necessary with limits. It is conceivable (if not true in this case) that the proportion of heterozygotes in generation n was 0 . 1 + n + 1 0 . 1 5 , for example. Then the proportion of heterozygotes would be steadily decreasing, and the proportions of the two monozygotes would be steadily increasing, and all three would tend to limits. It is just that the limit of the heterozygotes would then be 0 . 1 , and not zero.
My comment is that the fact that the proportion of heterozygotes tends to zero needs to be proved, and cannot simply be deduced from the fact that it decreases with each generation.
Log in to reply
@Mark Hennings – My question was, can we reach a nonzero limit for heterozygotes? Let's assume, 0 . 1 is limit of the ratio. So, some heterozygotes will remain at the end. However, if the remaining heterozygotes mate among themselves, the ratio decreases. Doesn't this contradict the assumption that there exists a nonzero limit?
Log in to reply
@Atomsky Jahid – "...some heterozygotes will remain in the end." You are still assuming that the limiting value is achieved. Even for this model, with the correct solution that the heterozygote population tends to 0 , it never actually reaches 0 .
Hi @Alice Smith , @Mark Hennings - I'm a bit late to the party but I think there's a fairly direct way to prove the population of small butterflies tends to zero without explicitly solving the recurrence; I've posted an alternative solution if you're interested.
Let the proportions of large red, small red and blue butterflies after n generations be R n , r n , b n , respectively. Then R n + r n + b n = 1 for all n , while R n + 1 r n + 1 = R n ( λ n + 2 1 ( 1 − λ n ) ) + r n ( 2 1 λ n + 4 1 ( 1 − λ n ) ) = 2 1 ( 1 + λ n ) R n + 4 1 ( 1 + λ n ) r n = R n 2 1 ( 1 − λ n ) + r n ( 2 1 λ n + 2 1 ( 1 − λ n ) ) = 2 1 ( 1 − λ n ) R n + 2 1 r n where λ n = R n + r n R n is the proportion of large red butterflies in the red butterfly population. Thus R n + 1 r n + 1 = 4 ( R n + r n ) ( 2 R n + r n ) 2 = 2 ( R n + r n ) r n ( 2 R n + r n ) From these identities it follows that 2 R n + 1 + r n + 1 = 2 R n + r n for all n ≥ 0 , and hence that 2 R n + r n = 2 R 0 + r 0 for all n ≥ 0 . This implies that r n + 1 r n + 1 − 1 = ( 2 R 0 + r 0 ) 2 R 0 + r 0 + r n r n = r n − 1 + ( 2 R 0 + r 0 ) − 1 so that r n − 1 r n = r 0 − 1 + n ( 2 R 0 + r 0 ) − 1 = r 0 ( 2 R 0 + r 0 ) 2 R 0 + r 0 + n r 0 = 2 R 0 + r 0 + n r 0 r 0 ( 2 R 0 + r 0 ) Thus we can find exact expressions for R n , r n and b n . Letting n → ∞ , we deduce that n → ∞ lim r n n → ∞ lim R n n → ∞ lim b n = 0 = R 0 + 2 1 r 0 = 1 − 0 − ( R 0 + 2 1 r 0 ) = 2 1 r 0 + b 0 With r 0 = 4 1 and b 0 = 2 1 , we obtain lim n → ∞ b n = 8 5 , making the answer 1 3 .
Let the proportions of large red, small red and blue butterflies in the n th generation be R n , r n , b n .
Two large red butterflies mate with probability R n + r n R n 2 , and their offspring will be a large red butterfly with probability 1 .
A large red mates with a small red with probability R n + r n 2 R n r n , and their offspring will be a large red butterfly with probability 2 1 .
Two small reds mate with probability R n + r n r n 2 , and their offspring will be a large red butterfly with probability 4 1 .
Continuing this analysis, we get the proportions in the next generation R n + 1 r n + 1 b n + 1 = 4 ( R n + r n ) ( 2 R n + r n ) 2 = 2 ( R n + r n ) r n ( 2 R n + r n ) = b n + 4 ( R n + r n ) r n 2
First, we will prove that the proportion of small reds tends to zero as n → ∞ . Assume that r 1 > 0 (as it is in this problem), and consider the ratio a n = r n R n . We have a n + 1 = 2 r n 2 R n + r n = r n R n + 2 1 = a n + 2 1
So clearly a n → ∞ . Since R n is certainly finite, the only way this can happen is if r n → 0 , as required. Hence b n + R n → 1 .
Now note that the quantity b n − R n does not change from one generation to the next: b n + 1 − R n + 1 = b n + 4 ( R n + r n ) r n 2 − 4 ( R n + r n ) ( 2 R n + r n ) 2 = b n + 4 ( R n + r n ) r n 2 − ( 2 R n + r n ) 2 = b n − 4 ( R n + r n ) 4 R n r n + R n 2 = b n − R n
With these facts, we can solve the problem; we have b n + R n → 1 as n → ∞ and b n − R n = b 0 − R 0 = 4 1 for all n .
Hence b n → 8 5 as n → ∞ and the required answer is 5 + 8 = 1 3 .
Of course, the real question is how did Dr Brilliant find so many small red butterflies in the first place? Or even so many of these butterflies at all, given their total population seems to halve every generation...
Log in to reply
Yes ... er ... Dr. Brilliant wrote in his journal that the large butterflies are slower and therefore more likely to be eaten by the South American brilliant lizard, a natural predator not present in his butterfly conservatory.
Log in to reply
Ah, the brilliant lizard, of course. I figured there'd be some different behaviour in captivity.
The Punnett square probabilities are:
An RR with RR will always make RR, an RR with Rb will make 2 1 RR and 2 1 Rb, an Rb with Rb will make 4 1 RR, 2 1 Rb, and 4 1 bb, and a bb with bb always make bb.
Let's say the ratio of the number of large red butterflies (RR) to the whole population is x , the ratio of small red butterflies (Rb) to the whole population is y , and the ratio of blue butterflies (bb) to the whole population is z .
Then x + y x of the large red butterflies (RR) will breed with large red butterflies (RR), and x + y y of the large red butterflies (RR) will breed with small red butterflies (Rb). Similarly, x + y x of the small red butterflies (Rb) will breed with large red butterflies (RR), and x + y y of the small red butterflies (Rb) will breed with small red butterflies (Rb). All blue butterflies (bb) will breed with other blue butterflies (bb). This means RR will breed with RR x + y x 2 of the time, RR will breed with Rb x + y x y + x + y x y = x + y 2 x y of the time, Rb will breed with Rb x + y y 2 of the time, and bb will breed with bb z of the time.
RR with RR: x + y x 2
RR with Rb: x + y 2 x y
Rb with Rb: x + y y 2
bb with bb: z
Using the Punnett Square probabilities above, an RR will always be bred from RR and RR parents, 2 1 of the time from RR and Rb parents, and 4 1 of the time from Rb and Rb parents, for a total of x + y x 2 + 2 1 ⋅ x + y 2 x y + 4 1 ⋅ x + y y 2 = 4 ( x + y ) 4 x 2 + 4 x y + y 2 of the population.
RR from:
RR with RR: 1 ⋅ x + y x 2
RR with Rb: 2 1 ⋅ x + y 2 x y
Rb with Rb: 4 1 ⋅ x + y y 2
Total: 4 ( x + y ) 4 x 2 + 4 x y + y 2
Likewise, an Rb will be bred 2 1 of the time from RR and Rb parents, and 2 1 of the time from Rb and Rb parents, for a total of 2 1 ⋅ x + y 2 x y + 2 1 ⋅ x + y y 2 = 2 ( x + y ) 2 x y + y 2 of the population.
Rb from:
RR with Rb: 2 1 ⋅ x + y 2 x y
Rb with Rb: 2 1 ⋅ x + y y 2
Total: 2 ( x + y ) 2 x y + y 2
Finally, a bb will be bred 4 1 of the time from Rb and Rb parents, and always from bb and bb parents, for a total of 4 1 ⋅ x + y y 2 + z = 4 ( x + y ) y 2 + z of the population.
bb from:
Rb with Rb: 2 1 ⋅ x + y y 2
bb with bb: 1 ⋅ z
Total: 4 ( x + y ) y 2 + z
There is therefore a recursive relationship of:
x n + 1 = 4 ( x n + y n ) 4 x n 2 + 4 x n y n + y n 2
y n + 1 = 2 ( x n + y n ) 2 x n y n + y n 2
z n + 1 = 4 ( x n + y n ) y n 2 + z n
for each generation n , where x 0 = 4 1 , y 0 = 4 1 , and z 0 = 2 1 .
This recursive relationship can be shown inductively to have the general equations of:
x n = 8 n + 2 4 3 n + 6
y n = 4 n + 1 2 3
z n = 8 n + 2 4 5 n + 1 2
.
Inductive Proof:
The first case is true because x 0 = 8 ( 0 ) + 2 4 3 ( 0 ) + 6 = 4 1 , y 0 = 4 ( 0 ) + 1 2 3 = 4 1 , and z 0 = 8 ( 0 ) + 2 4 5 ( 0 ) + 1 2 = 2 1 . Assuming x n = 8 n + 2 4 3 n + 6 , y n = 4 n + 1 2 3 , and z n = 8 n + 2 4 5 n + 1 2 are true:
x n + 1 = 4 ( x n + y n ) 4 x n 2 + 4 x n y n + y n 2 = 4 ( 8 n + 2 4 3 n + 6 + 4 n + 1 2 3 ) 4 ( 8 n + 2 4 3 n + 6 ) 2 + 4 ( 8 n + 2 4 3 n + 6 ) ( 4 n + 1 2 3 ) + ( 4 n + 1 2 3 ) 2 = 8 ( n + 1 ) + 2 4 3 ( n + 1 ) + 6
y n + 1 = 2 ( x n + y n ) 2 x n y n + y n 2 = 2 ( 8 n + 2 4 3 n + 6 + 4 n + 1 2 3 ) 2 ( 8 n + 2 4 3 n + 6 ) ( 4 n + 1 2 3 ) + ( 4 n + 1 2 3 ) 2 = 4 ( n + 1 ) + 1 2 3
z n + 1 = 4 ( x n + y n ) y n 2 + z n = 4 ( 8 n + 2 4 3 n + 6 + 4 n + 1 2 3 ) ( 4 n + 1 2 3 ) 2 + 8 n + 2 4 5 n + 1 2 = 8 ( n + 1 ) + 2 4 5 ( n + 1 ) + 1 2
which completes the inductive proof.
As time goes on, the expected portion of blue butterflies will be:
n → ∞ lim z n
= n → ∞ lim 8 n + 2 4 5 n + 1 2
= n → ∞ lim 8 + n 2 4 5 + n 1 2
= 8 5
so a = 5 , b = 8 , and a + b = 1 3 .
Inductive proofs are not insightful at all! How did you get the closed form?
Log in to reply
I found the first few terms using a spreadsheet, and managed to find the pattern that way. I wish I had a better method for finding it, because it was pretty much trial and error and not very intuitive, but that's how I found it.
Try my solution for a method of deriving the formulae
It's interesting to notice that only Rb-Rb mating changes the the population proportions. This type of interaction increases the ratio of RR and bb population by equal amount.
Here's my challenge inspired by yours: Red Queen and her roses
Problem Loading...
Note Loading...
Set Loading...
Here's my simple solution: Think about the gametes produced.
During each generation, the amounts of each gametes, R and b, are conservated and their ratio is always the same .
When the red butterflies breed with each other, according to the Punnett square, the heterozygote (Rb) will gradually turn into RR, and bb, therefore the portion of the heterozygote will be approaching to 0 , only left with RR and bb.
Since the initial portion is 4 1 RR, 4 1 Rb, 2 1 bb, the portion of the gametes, R and b, is 8 3 and 8 5 .
And since the the amounts of each gametes are conservated , the final state is 8 3 RR and 8 5 bb,
Thus the portion of blue butterflies is 8 5 , a + b = 1 3 .